java-topology/defects/camel/patch/CLEAN.md
russell@unturf.com 52a8d535a2 dubbo-0001 + cxf-0001: annotation diamond recursion O(2^D); WSDL import O(N²); count 621→623
dubbo-0001: AnnotationUtils.getAllMetaAnnotations recurses into meta-annotation graph
without a visited set — diamond shapes cause O(2^D) calls (UNDF-2026-000000238)

cxf-0001: SchemaUtil.parseImports + WSDLServiceBuilder.parseImports use ArrayList.contains
as visited guard on WSDL import graph — O(N²) membership checks (UNDF-2026-000000237)

Struts, RabbitMQ, Camel: CLEAN
2026-03-29 18:23:19 -04:00

32 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown

# Apache Camel — CWE-407 Scan Result: CLEAN (beyond camel-0001)
## Scan Date: 2026-03-29
## Scope
Searched for route dependency traversal, `@DependsOn`-style annotation handling, and
recursive route startup ordering without visited sets. The pre-existing `camel-0001` defect
(route startup `ArrayList` O(R²)) is already documented.
## Findings
### InternalRouteStartupManager
Route startup ordering uses `TreeMap` and `LinkedHashMap` for ordering — no recursive
traversal of a route dependency graph. Routes are sorted by `startupOrder` integer value
via `Comparator`, not by graph traversal.
### AbstractCamelContextFactoryBean.getDependsOn
`getDependsOn()` is an abstract method returning a `String` — just a label for Spring
`@DependsOn` ordering. No Camel-internal graph traversal is performed; Spring's own
dependency resolution handles this.
### Route dependency shutdown (DefaultShutdownStrategy)
Uses reverse `startupOrder` sorting — no recursive graph traversal.
### TypeUtils / annotation processors
Camel does not use annotation processors for meta-annotation hierarchies in the manner
Dubbo does. Camel's `@RoutingSlip`, `@RecipientList` etc. are resolved at runtime on
flat lists.
## Conclusion
CLEAN (beyond pre-existing camel-0001). No additional CWE-407 defects found in Apache Camel
route dependency or startup ordering code.