3.6 KiB
Performance Report: 4.2.28
Generated: 2026-01-24T23:31:17Z Pipeline: #12507
Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Tests | 645 |
| Passed | 645 |
| Failed | 0 |
| Pass Rate | 100.0% |
| Languages | 43 |
| Avg Duration | 116s |
| Slowest | commonlisp (145s) |
| Fastest | awk (102s) |
Test Duration by Language
The primary performance metric - how long each language takes to run its full test suite (15 tests per language).
Key observations:
- COMMONLISP and PERL are outliers at 90+ seconds
- Most languages cluster between 20-40 seconds
- Compiled languages (red) tend to be faster than interpreted (blue)
- AWK is the fastest at 102 seconds
Compiled vs Interpreted
Comparing performance between compiled languages (C, Go, Rust, etc.) and interpreted languages (Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc.).
Findings:
- 20 compiled languages vs 22 interpreted
- Compiled languages have lower median execution time
- Interpreted languages show more variance (wider spread)
- The white diamond marks the mean for each category
Duration Distribution
Histogram showing how test durations are distributed across all 43 languages.
Distribution analysis:
- Most languages complete in 20-35 seconds (the peak)
- Mean (green dashed) and median (blue dotted) are close together
- Long tail on the right from slow outliers (commonlisp, perl)
Speed Leaders
Side-by-side comparison of the 10 slowest and 10 fastest languages.
Slowest (left): COMMONLISP, PERL, LUA, R, BASH Fastest (right): AWK, COBOL, D, FORTRAN, JAVA
Queue vs Execution Time
Scatter plot showing the relationship between CI queue wait time and actual test execution time.
Notes:
- Queue time is how long the job waited for a runner
- Most jobs had similar queue times (clustered vertically)
- Outliers labeled - commonlisp and perl took longest to execute regardless of queue time
Dashboard
Summary dashboard combining key metrics and visualizations.
Raw Data
Per-Language Performance
| Language | Status | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| commonlisp | Passed | 145s |
| perl | Passed | 143s |
| lua | Passed | 140s |
| r | Passed | 137s |
| bash | Passed | 137s |
| elixir | Passed | 131s |
| tcl | Passed | 130s |
| scheme | Passed | 129s |
| erlang | Passed | 129s |
| julia | Passed | 128s |
| raku | Passed | 127s |
| dart | Passed | 127s |
| c | Passed | 126s |
| haskell | Passed | 124s |
| fsharp | Passed | 124s |
| ocaml | Passed | 123s |
| cpp | Passed | 123s |
| groovy | Passed | 117s |
| python | Passed | 114s |
| javascript | Passed | 113s |
| go | Passed | 113s |
| typescript | Passed | 112s |
| ruby | Passed | 112s |
| crystal | Passed | 112s |
| clojure | Passed | 112s |
| deno | Passed | 111s |
| php | Passed | 110s |
| rust | Passed | 109s |
| csharp | Passed | 109s |
| prolog | Passed | 106s |
| dotnet | Passed | 106s |
| forth | Passed | 105s |
| v | Passed | 104s |
| kotlin | Passed | 104s |
| zig | Passed | 103s |
| powershell | Passed | 103s |
| objc | Passed | 103s |
| nim | Passed | 103s |
| java | Passed | 103s |
| fortran | Passed | 103s |
| d | Passed | 103s |
| cobol | Passed | 103s |
| awk | Passed | 102s |
Report generated by UN Inception CI pipeline