3.6 KiB
Performance Report: 4.2.19
Generated: 2026-01-23T20:20:06Z Pipeline: #12233
Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Tests | 701 |
| Passed | 701 |
| Failed | 0 |
| Pass Rate | 100.0% |
| Languages | 43 |
| Avg Duration | 151s |
| Slowest | lua (472s) |
| Fastest | dart (40s) |
Test Duration by Language
The primary performance metric - how long each language takes to run its full test suite (15 tests per language).
Key observations:
- LUA and PERL are outliers at 90+ seconds
- Most languages cluster between 20-40 seconds
- Compiled languages (red) tend to be faster than interpreted (blue)
- DART is the fastest at 40 seconds
Compiled vs Interpreted
Comparing performance between compiled languages (C, Go, Rust, etc.) and interpreted languages (Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc.).
Findings:
- 20 compiled languages vs 22 interpreted
- Compiled languages have lower median execution time
- Interpreted languages show more variance (wider spread)
- The white diamond marks the mean for each category
Duration Distribution
Histogram showing how test durations are distributed across all 43 languages.
Distribution analysis:
- Most languages complete in 20-35 seconds (the peak)
- Mean (green dashed) and median (blue dotted) are close together
- Long tail on the right from slow outliers (lua, perl)
Speed Leaders
Side-by-side comparison of the 10 slowest and 10 fastest languages.
Slowest (left): LUA, PERL, JAVA, RUBY, POWERSHELL Fastest (right): DART, PYTHON, TYPESCRIPT, DOTNET, JAVASCRIPT
Queue vs Execution Time
Scatter plot showing the relationship between CI queue wait time and actual test execution time.
Notes:
- Queue time is how long the job waited for a runner
- Most jobs had similar queue times (clustered vertically)
- Outliers labeled - lua and perl took longest to execute regardless of queue time
Dashboard
Summary dashboard combining key metrics and visualizations.
Raw Data
Per-Language Performance
| Language | Status | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| lua | Passed | 472s |
| perl | Passed | 468s |
| java | Passed | 423s |
| ruby | Passed | 298s |
| powershell | Passed | 247s |
| awk | Passed | 241s |
| forth | Passed | 231s |
| csharp | Passed | 211s |
| ocaml | Passed | 210s |
| c | Passed | 179s |
| go | Passed | 169s |
| fortran | Passed | 161s |
| objc | Passed | 156s |
| cobol | Passed | 149s |
| julia | Passed | 147s |
| d | Passed | 141s |
| raku | Passed | 132s |
| rust | Passed | 130s |
| clojure | Passed | 125s |
| php | Passed | 123s |
| scheme | Passed | 122s |
| erlang | Passed | 122s |
| commonlisp | Passed | 121s |
| cpp | Passed | 120s |
| groovy | Passed | 115s |
| elixir | Passed | 111s |
| bash | Passed | 111s |
| r | Passed | 106s |
| haskell | Passed | 104s |
| nim | Passed | 102s |
| deno | Passed | 100s |
| crystal | Passed | 100s |
| fsharp | Passed | 96s |
| zig | Passed | 90s |
| v | Passed | 86s |
| tcl | Passed | 83s |
| kotlin | Passed | 71s |
| prolog | Passed | 69s |
| javascript | Passed | 68s |
| dotnet | Passed | 68s |
| typescript | Passed | 61s |
| python | Passed | 49s |
| dart | Passed | 40s |
Report generated by UN Inception CI pipeline