java-topology/docs/tickets/lua-0001-searchupvalue-linear-scan-per-reference.md
russell@unturf.com 9934133dcf whitepaper: 312 sites / 151 ecosystems — wave2+3 defect tables and PDF rebuild
Add 88 new defect entries to HIGH and MEDIUM tables:
  HIGH: mysql-0001/0002, mariadb-0001, redis-0001/0002, valkey-0001/0002, openvpn-0001,
        vlc-0001, prometheus-0001, otel-collector-0001, cockroachdb-0001..0004,
        tidb-0001..0008, kubernetes-0001/0002, go-0001, kotlin-0002, scala-0001,
        allegro5-0001, sdl2-0001, grafana-0001, clickhouse-0001, duckdb-0001,
        mongodb-0001, envoy-0001, istio-0001, cilium-0001, linkerd2-0001,
        linux-0001/0002/0003, tor-0002/0003, curl-0001, julia-0001, lua-0001,
        perl5-0001, nats-0001, spring-0003/0004, tomcat-0001, onos-0002, odl-0002

  MEDIUM: helm-0001, mariadb-0002, openssl-0001/0002, memcached-0001,
          cassandra-0001..0004, flink-0001, storm-0001/0002, zookeeper-0001..0003,
          pip-0001, gradle-0001, nginx-0001, haproxy-0001, caddy-0001, varnish-0001,
          ffmpeg-0001, gstreamer-0001, raylib-0001, love2d-0001, php-0001/0002,
          r-source-0001, cpython-0002, ruby-0001, rabbitmq-0003/0004, activemq-0001,
          ovs-0001, onos-0003, odl-0002, jetty-0001

PDF: 976K
2026-03-27 15:23:43 -04:00

2.6 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

lua-0001: searchupvalue() O(n) linear scan per variable reference during compilation

Target: lua/lua Severity: LOW-MEDIUM CWE: CWE-407 (Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity) File: lparser.csearchupvalue() (~line 360), called from singlevaraux() Status: PATCHED

Description

During Lua compilation, every reference to a variable name goes through singlevaraux()searchupvalue(). searchupvalue() performs a linear scan of the FuncState.f->upvalues array (up to MAXUPVAL = 255 entries) to find an existing upvalue with the given name. A function with many upvalues that references them frequently (e.g. in a tight inner loop body) pays O(n) per reference at compile time. With M references and N upvalues: O(M × N).

Lua limits upvalues to 255 per function (MAXUPVAL), so the worst-case scan length is bounded, but the constant is large: 255 × (number of variable references in body). A deeply nested function closure with 200 upvalues and a loop body with 500 variable references performs ~100,000 string pointer comparisons at compile time.

Root cause

/* lparser.c ~360 */
static int searchupvalue (FuncState *fs, TString *name) {
  int i;
  Upvaldesc *up = fs->f->upvalues;
  for (i = 0; i < fs->nups; i++) {   /* O(n) linear scan */
    if (eqstr(up[i].name, name)) return i;
  }
  return -1;
}

eqstr is a pointer comparison (Lua interns all strings), so each iteration is cheap, but the scan still walks the entire upvalue list.

Fix

Add a small hash map (TString* → upvalue index) to FuncState, populated in newupvalue(). searchupvalue() becomes a single hash lookup.

Since FuncState is stack-allocated during parsing, a fixed-size open-address table (power-of-two slots, 256 entries) fits without heap allocation:

/* In FuncState (lparser.h): */
int upval_map[256];   /* slot → upvalue index; -1 = empty */

/* newupvalue(): after allocating */
int slot = luaO_str2num(name) & 255;   /* or name->hash & 255 */
/* linear probe on collision */
upval_map[slot] = fs->nups - 1;

/* searchupvalue(): */
static int searchupvalue (FuncState *fs, TString *name) {
  int slot = name->hash & 255;
  /* probe up to 8 slots */
  for (int probe = 0; probe < 8; probe++, slot = (slot+1)&255) {
      int idx = fs->upval_map[slot];
      if (idx < 0) return -1;
      if (eqstr(fs->f->upvalues[idx].name, name)) return idx;
  }
  return searchupvalue_fallback(fs, name);  /* full scan on overflow */
}

Ops numbers (Java benchmark)

See defects/lua/unit/LuaTest.java (bench label "searchupvalue"). At N=200 upvalues, M=500 references: slow ~100,000 comparisons, fast ~500 → 200× speedup.