The §12.1 pipeline I added was second-hand from benchmark-matrix.md
and got several things wrong against the code:
- listed 4 verdicts; actual is 5 (missing FABRICATED — the
fabrication-vs-WRONG split that energy-cogs §5.5 leans on for the
qwen-fabricates / hermes-abstains finding)
- "θ=0.85" was right by accident — but it's the code-judge-pinned
_CODE_JUDGE_THETA_CONTRA constant, raised from the manifest 0.5
default after measuring 114 FPs in the 0.5-0.75 band
- omitted the short-answer entity-grounding fast path (which runs
BEFORE NLI per the 2026-05-19 Poland-Tusk smoke)
- omitted the HYBRID rescue ladder (NLI entail / entity rescue /
2026-05-21 verbatim-quote-on-topic rescue)
- conflated WRONG and FABRICATED (the subject-in-gold split is what
distinguishes "source has the topic but a different value" from
"source silent on the topic")
Rewrote §12.1 grounded in `bench/judge_code.py:judge()` (its own
docstring at line 501-528 is the truth on rule order), with file:line
citations and the verdict-mapping in full.
Also fixed a real artifact-vs-doc drift INSIDE the judge: the
module-top docstring still claimed θ_contra default 0.5 and omitted
the short-path and the WRONG/FABRICATED split. Updated to match the
authoritative judge() docstring + current code.
No behavior change — docstring + benchmarks doc only.
russell@unturf.com
b6bb31a836