fox 2026-05-12: the attribution-aware path (#000048's deferred §2.3 —
closing the 2 recombination over-grounds in falsification-hard) is its
own ticket, not a #000048 phase. So:
#000048 → closed (at 2.1 + 2.4). Steps 2.1 + 2.4 landed 2026-05-11
(12 of 16 residual items: 4 HYBRID_ENTITY over-grounds + 8 Formulate
mis-segments → formulate-hard 12/12, falsification-hard 10/12; each
bench-gated, no STRICT-rate regression). Step 2.2 (single-clause-
containment paraphrase check) attempted + reverted — recombination-
vs-summary isn't lexical (§5 "What we learned"). The 2 residual
falsification-hard fixtures (hard-003 Mercury, hard-005 Einstein)
stand as a documented marker of where the lexical verifier stops.
Header + §5 Closure + §2.3 updated; cross-refs in #000046 / #000012
§8 / TICKETS.md repointed from "#000048 §2.3" to "#000049".
#000049 opened (doc-only, awaiting go/no-go) — "Attribution-aware
grounding check (the recombination boundary)". The recombination
class needs an attribution / dependency-parse or mini-NLI check
(distinguishing "Mercury is the largest" against "Jupiter is the
largest; Mercury is the smallest" from a legit cross-sentence
summary). Options: 2.1 hand-rolled dependency-attribution heuristic
(no model, brittle — same threshold-can't-separate problem one rung
up); 2.2 small purpose-built NLI model ([nli] extra, policy-gated,
off-by-default, bench-gated — the right capability, but forces the
"is a fixed NLI model an LLM-judge?" discipline call + a model
dependency + a non-determinism surface to pin); 2.3 do nothing (the
2 fixtures are a boundary marker, no observed real-traffic harm).
Recommends 2.3 until real-traffic recombination over-grounds show up,
then 2.2 *if* fox rules a fixed NLI model is acceptable in the
proof-adjacent path; the first decision the ticket needs is that
discipline question. Next ID 000049 → 000050. #000048 follow-up.
Doc-only — no code change.
russell@unturf.com
20f6061f83