Commit graph

103 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
7bb11ed62f
#000048 step 2.4 — parse_pointer_claims clause segmentation
Closes the 8 mis-segments #000046 left in formulate-hard-v1.jsonl.
The parser was line/bullet-only — one line ⇒ one claim — so a line
that crammed several pointered claims onto one row ("Water is wet
[E1]; fire is hot [E2]", "X happened [E1]. Y followed [E2]") became
one monolithic claim with all the pointers, and a wrapped bullet
became two.

arborist/qa/parse_claims.py: _SEGMENT_SEP_RE splits a line on ';',
sentence boundaries ('. '/'! '/'? ' then a Capital), spaced dashes
(' - '/' — '/' – '), ' and '/' or '/' because '/' although '/' since
'/' while ', inline '(N)' enumeration markers, and commas — with
'(?![^\[]*\])' so a comma inside a [E1, E2] bracket never splits it.
_segment_line keeps the split ONLY IF every resulting non-empty
segment is a well-pointered claim — a legit single claim ("The cat
is black and white [E1].", "The cast: A, B, C [E1].") is never
broken because splitting it would manufacture pointer-less prose
fragments → guard rejects; a leading colon-terminated header with no
pointer ("Two facts:", "Key points:") is allowed and dropped. Plus a
wrapped-bullet join: a continuation line (leading whitespace then a
lowercase letter, no bullet glyph) folds its text + pointers into the
previous claim.

Effect: formulate-hard rate 4/12 → 12/12 (the pack is now at ceiling
— a harder Formulate tier would re-open below-ceiling headroom; a
#000046 follow-up). Remaining #000048 headroom: 2 STRICT_PARAPHRASE
recombinations in falsification-hard (Mercury, Einstein — step 2.2).

Bench gate: make bench-qa (n=3 × 75 × 3 = 675 cells; parse_pointer_claims
feeds the 450 claim_lattice_pointer + claim_lattice cells) after
(bench/qa_results/2026-05-11T20-26-37Z) vs the pre-step-2.4 baseline
(...T17-12-41Z = HEAD's parse_claims.py). STRICT-rate quote 0.54→0.55,
pointer 0.22→0.22, lattice 0.43→0.45 — all within the 5-pp noise
floor. Per-row diff: the segmenter changed the parsed-claim count on
the SAME answer text for 7 of the 450 lattice cells (0 in
claim_lattice, 7 in claim_lattice_pointer); of those, 2 caused an
audit_mode change — both correct: a wrap-join recovered an answer's
intended structure (4 claims, 2 pointer-less wrap-fragments → HYBRID)
into 2 well-pointered claims → STRICT; and a crammed-one-line blob (1
monolithic claim, all pointers → STRICT) split into 8 claims, some
not individually verifying → HYBRID (the honest verdict — false-
positive STRICT was the corruption). Every other lattice/quote delta
is LLM re-answer variance. No regression — the segmenter's only
visible effects on real traffic are honest improvements. Summarized
in qa-modes-bench.md Addendum 7 + ticket-000048 §5 step 2.4.

Tests: 8 new in test_claim_lattice.py (semicolon/sentence/conjunction
splits; pointerless-fragment + cast-list guards; leading-colon-header
drop; wrapped-bullet join; pointer-order/multi-pointer); existing
parse_pointer_claims tests pass untouched; test_5f_formulate_hard_pack
re-pinned 4/12 → 12/12. make test 2358 passed, 28 skipped.

#000048 → steps 2.1 + 2.4 landed; #000046 / #000012 §8 / TICKETS.md /
Makefile / fixture _meta + notes updated.
2026-05-11 17:09:06 -04:00
9899a33b7b
#000048 step 2.1 — verify_quotes entity salient-token-disagreement gate
Closes the 4 HYBRID_ENTITY over-grounds #000046 left in
falsification-hard-v1.jsonl. The entity strategy grants HYBRID when a
multi-word proper noun matches the source — but "Insulin was
discovered by Alexander Fleming" against "Penicillin was discovered by
Alexander Fleming" matches on the shared "Alexander Fleming" while the
swapped subject "Insulin" (the falsehood) is ignored.

arborist/qa/verify.py: _entity_salient_disagrees(answer_text, norm_ctx)
flags a >4-char Capitalized content token (stopword-filtered) or a
digit-number in the answer absent from the source.
_is_single_sentence(text) — no internal '. '/'! '/'? ' break. Gated in
verify_quotes' entity branch (proximity policy) in the weakest-grounding
slot only: not cluster AND len(verified) <= 1 AND _is_single_sentence
AND _entity_salient_disagrees → UNGROUNDED. The narrow caller-gate is
what keeps a structured multi-claim summary untouched — the Matrix cast
list (many entities, a tight cluster) and the TMNT answer (a numbered
list with parenthetical nicknames the source omits): model-added
accurate detail in a real summary isn't a contradiction, only the
single-sentence-one-weak-match shape is. The Matrix/TMNT/hybrid
entity-path regression tests still pass, pinned untouched.

Effect: falsification-hard rate 6/12 → 10/12 = 0.833 (Insulin / Berlin
/ 1889 / Pacific now correctly UNGROUNDED). The 2 live-pack fixtures it
newly demotes — 5f-fal-live-003 (the exact gap #000046 built its hard
pack around) and 5f-fal-live-028 — had expected_reason updated
HYBRID_ENTITY → UNGROUNDED (the live pack records what verify_quotes
actually does). Remaining hard-pack headroom: 2 STRICT_PARAPHRASE
recombinations (Mercury, Einstein — step 2.2) + 8 Formulate
mis-segments (step 2.4).

Bench gate: make bench-qa (n=3 × 75 × 3 = 675 cells) after
(bench/qa_results/2026-05-11T17-12-41Z) vs the pre-step-2.1 baseline
(...T14-19-51Z = HEAD's verify.py). STRICT-rate quote 0.50→0.54,
pointer 0.25→0.22, lattice 0.45→0.43 — all within the 5-pp noise
floor. Per-row diff (675 common cells, 30 quote-mode rows changed
audit_mode): 0 quote-mode rows demoted to UNGROUNDED from the entity
path — the gate fired on 0 legitimate QA answers in the whole bench.
Every transition was LLM re-answer variance (verifier quote→quote with
the verdict flipping); pointer/lattice deltas are noise too (the gate
is in verify_quotes / quote mode, not the claim-lattice verifier). No
regression — the gate is provably narrow on real traffic. Summarized in
qa-modes-bench.md Addendum 6 + ticket-000048 §5 step 2.1.

Tests: 4 new in test_verify.py (_is_single_sentence helper,
_entity_salient_disagrees helper, swapped-subject → UNGROUNDED,
gate-narrow-on-multi-claim); test_5f_falsification_hard_pack_below_ceiling
re-pinned 6/12 → 10/12; test_fork_score_positive_gamma_5f_... updated
(positive γ·Δ5f on the real lift — possibly MARGINAL given the ÷5
dilution; ACCEPT via a degraded-parent sub-scenario).
make test 2343 passed, 28 skipped.

#000048 → step 2.1 landed; #000046 / #000012 §8 / TICKETS.md /
Makefile / fixture _meta + notes / baseline JSON updated.
2026-05-11 13:57:45 -04:00
724f433790
#000046 closed — verify_quotes paraphrase numeric-agreement gate (Phase 3)
Closes the harder-fixture-tier ticket: a real verify_quotes
tightening lifts the falsification-hard rate 4/12 → 6/12, bench-gated,
ForkScore's bench-Δ goes positive on it — the loop is closed
end-to-end.

arborist/qa/verify.py: _numeric_signature(text) extracts comma-
stripped digit-runs ('8,849' and '8849' collapse; '300' stays
distinct from '300000' ← '300,000'). _check_each_with_paraphrase
gains a gate: a span that token-covers the source ≥ paraphrase_coverage
but asserts a digit-number the source lacks (modulo thousands-comma)
is no longer paraphrase-grounded — it goes to unverified. Catches the
near-miss the lexical coverage check is blind to ("Water boils at 50
degrees" against a source saying 100 token-covers 100% because
'50'/'100' aren't >4-char content tokens). Narrow by construction:
fires only on the paraphrase fallback (verbatim/span/entity/claim-
lattice paths untouched), only on a digit-number. A rounding-
paraphrase demoting here is the honest verdict — it isn't a verbatim
grounding.

Hard pack: lifts 5f-fal-hard-004 (50 vs 100) and -007 (300 vs
300,000) to UNGROUNDED → falsification-hard rate 4/12 → 6/12 = 0.5.
The other 6 over-grounds (4 HYBRID_ENTITY + 2 recombined-no-number
STRICT_PARAPHRASE) and the Formulate hard pack are unaffected —
headroom for a bigger order/dependency-aware verifier upgrade, an
optional follow-up, not a #000046 blocker.

Bench gate: make bench-qa (n=3 × 75 questions × 3 modes = 675 cells)
before / after. STRICT-rate quote 0.53→0.50, pointer 0.23→0.25,
lattice 0.44→0.45 — all within the 5-pp noise floor. Per-row diff
(675 common cells, 74 changed audit_mode): the only clearly
gate-attributable QA shift was the fictional "our cold fusion
breakthrough" year-claim demoting STRICT→HYBRID (×3 samples) — a
correct demotion; every other transition was quote→quote /
claim_lattice→claim_lattice LLM re-answer variance. No regression on
legit answers. Artifacts: bench/qa_results/2026-05-11T13-42-38Z (before)
and ...T14-19-51Z (after) — gitignored; summarized in qa-modes-bench.md
Addendum 5 + ticket-000046 §5 Phase 3.

Worked example: fork_score on the real change — parent {5f/
falsification: 4/12} → child {5f/falsification: 6/12} → γ·Δ5f =
(1/6)/5 ≈ +0.033 > 0 (positive; a single improvement of this size is
MARGINAL by the ÷5 dilution, the test pins the full-lift-to-1.0 case
at ACCEPT).

Tests: 5 new in tests/test_verify.py (numeric_signature normalization
+ subset-matches-comma-variant + disagreement-rejected +
gate-is-narrow + number-present-still-verifies);
test_5f_falsification_hard_pack_below_ceiling re-pinned 4/12 → 6/12.
make test 2339 passed, 28 skipped.

#000046 → closed; #000012 §8 §4 + TICKETS.md row + falsification-hard
_meta / hard-004,007 notes + Makefile 8/12→6/12 comments updated.

(Makefile also carries an uncommitted chain-check-SQL improvement from
the concurrent session — NOT in this commit; staged only the
#000046-comment hunks.)
2026-05-11 11:03:02 -04:00
0c1bad8494
#000046 Phase 2 — HARD Formulate tier (second below-ceiling pack)
Extends the #000046 hard tier to the Formulate sub-battery.

bench/fixtures/5f/formulate-hard-v1.jsonl — 12 prose inputs that
arborist.qa.parse_claims.parse_pointer_claims SHOULD segment into a
particular claim lattice (recorded in expected_lattice). The parser
is line/bullet-based — one line ⇒ one claim, [E#] tokens attach to
it — so 8 of 12 it mis-segments: merges and-/semicolon-/dash-joined
or (1)(2)-enumerated multi-claim lines into one claim with all the
pointers, or splits a wrapped bullet into two. Those 8 fail at HEAD
on claim-count mismatch; the other 4 are well-formed bullet/numbered
lists / single claims the parser handles right. Rate at HEAD = 4/12
= 0.333, stable (parse_pointer_claims is deterministic). A
claim-lattice parser that does sentence/clause segmentation (split on
'. ', ';', subordinating conjunctions, inline enumerations) + joins
wrapped bullets lifts the rate toward 1.0 → positive γ·Δ5f for that
child fork.

make bench-5f-formulate-hard runs it (|| true past the runner's
nonzero-on-failures exit). Not in `make bench-5f` / `runner --all`.

tests/test_bench_batteries.py — test_5f_formulate_hard_pack_below_ceiling
(pins rate 4/12, source=live, the 8 fails are claim-count
mis-segments).

#000046 → "Phase 1 + Phase 2 landed"; two below-ceiling 5F subs now
exist (falsification, formulate). Closure still pending an actual
surface improvement (verify_quotes tightening — bench-gated — or
parse_pointer_claims segmentation) that lifts a rate. §5 + §6 +
TICKETS.md row updated.

(Makefile also carries an uncommitted chain-check-SQL improvement
from the concurrent #000039 session — NOT included in this commit;
staged only the bench-5f-formulate-hard hunk + the .PHONY line.)
2026-05-11 08:40:44 -04:00
3ea27aa471
#000047 — close: delta_aggregator knob on ForkScore (Option D)
The #000025 §10.14 calibration showed _delta_5{s,t,f} mean over a
battery's 5 subs, so a single-sub gain weighs 1/5 of face value (the
5× dilution). #000047 ships the knob to pick the aggregation, default
unchanged.

WeightSet.delta_aggregator ∈ {"mean","max","sum"} (default "mean") —
a categorical field, validated in __post_init__ against
DELTA_AGGREGATORS; from_dict takes it as a string. Default unchanged →
ScoredFork output byte-identical → no fork_score.ESTIMATOR_VERSION
bump.

fork_score._aggregate(deltas, how): mean = arithmetic mean, max =
max(0.0, max_i Δ_i), sum = Σ Δ_i; empty → 0.0. _delta_5s/_delta_5t/
_delta_5f take an aggregator arg (default "mean"); the 5F efficiency
bonus is added after the aggregated base (aggregator-independent).
fork_score passes weights.delta_aggregator. The per-sub
HARD_REGRESSION_FLOOR flags are computed before aggregation, so a
single-sub regression still forces REJECT under max/sum. The chosen
aggregator is recorded in ScoredFork.weights["delta_aggregator"] (via
WeightSet.as_dict()); fork_score_branches traceability stays via the
opaque weights_id — no schema migration.

bench/scripts/fivef_threshold_calibration.py gained §5 — runs the
#000046 below-ceiling pack (5f/falsification at 0.333) and shows the
verdict / γ·Δ5f under each aggregator; bench/results/5f-threshold-
calibration-2026-05-11.md §5 is the captured record. Default stays
"mean" — the conservative, noise-robust, regression-symmetric choice
matching docs/bench-maxing.md's per-rate floor framing; v8 picks
max/sum per-deployment.

Tests: 8 new in tests/test_fork_score.py + 1 anchor in
tests/test_fivef_threshold_calibration.py; tests/test_weights.py
as_dict field-set test updated to include delta_aggregator;
test_fork_score.py AUTOCOUNT tags (#000012 §286, warrant-substrate-
cookbook.md ×2) bumped 23 → 31.

#000047 closed; #000012 §8 §3 + TICKETS.md row updated.
Full suite: 2330 passed, 28 skipped.
2026-05-11 08:27:38 -04:00
01d697f961
#000046 Phase 1 — HARD live-path Falsification tier (first below-ceiling pack)
Closes the "everything is at rate 1.0 so fork_score's bench-Δ terms
are inert" gap the #000025 §10.14 calibration surfaced — at least on
the 5F/falsification axis.

bench/fixtures/5f/falsification-hard-v1.jsonl — 12 near-misses, each a
FALSE/unsupported claim whose correct verdict is UNGROUNDED (recorded
in expected_reason). 8 of 12 are over-grounded by
arborist.qa.verify.verify_quotes at HEAD — its paraphrase
token-coverage strategy returns STRICT_PARAPHRASE, its entity-proximity
strategy returns HYBRID_ENTITY, both matching on incidental overlap
(shared entities/numbers, the same key terms stated in the opposite
direction) — so those tasks fail by design; the other 4 the verifier
handles correctly. Rate at HEAD = 4/12 = 0.333, stable (verify_quotes
is pure-lexical / deterministic). Built around the pre-documented gap
5f-fal-live-003.

make bench-5f-falsification-hard runs the pack; make
bench-fork-baseline-hard pins it to
bench/results/baseline-falsification-hard.json. Both targets `|| true`
past the runner's nonzero-on-failures exit (8 fixtures fail by design;
the JSON is still written).

tests/test_bench_batteries.py — test_5f_falsification_hard_pack_below_ceiling
(pins rate 4/12, source=live, every fixture asserts UNGROUNDED, the 8
fails are over-grounds not abstentions) +
test_fork_score_positive_gamma_5f_on_hard_falsification_improvement
(the worked example: fork_score(parent={5f/falsification: 1/3},
child={5f/falsification: 1.0}) → gamma*Delta5f ≈ +0.133 > 0, verdict
ACCEPT, no regression flags — the bench Δ-rate carrying signal it
can't carry while every canonical pack is at ceiling).

NOT in `make bench-5f` / `make bench-5s5t5f` / `make
bench-fork-baseline` / `runner --all` — the hard pack is a separate,
deliberately-failing artifact pinned on its own.

#000046 flipped to "in progress · Phase 1 landed"; closure pending an
actual verify_quotes tightening that lifts the rate (a separate,
larger task). ticket-000012 §8 §4 + TICKETS.md row updated.

Full suite: 2314 passed, 28 skipped.
2026-05-11 08:16:01 -04:00
8599ce3b2c
ticket #000036: add KAT-regen tooling + close
"One more iteration then close" (fox): added committed KAT-regeneration
scripts for both the T3 calculator and φ_PRG — the regen step was a
throwaway temp script before; now it's reproducible and the phi_prg
test's skipif reason ("run scripts/generate_phi_prg_kat.py") points at
a file that exists. Then closed #000036.

New scripts:
- scripts/generate_t3_bound_kat.py — regenerates
  bench/fixtures/t3-bound/known-answer-tests.jsonl from a fixed 12-config
  list (the §7 worked examples under max_envelope + non-default-C_B*
  + g=0 edge + explicit-b1_model pins for the other three models).
- scripts/generate_phi_prg_kat.py — regenerates
  bench/fixtures/phi-prg/known-answer-tests.jsonl from a fixed 10-entry
  list (placeholder/random seeds, one-bit-flip variants, block-boundary
  dim_h=16/17, 4096 counter-rollover stress).
- Both verified to reproduce the committed fixture data lines byte-
  for-byte (only the header comments changed, to reference the script).
  Each docstring states: run after any algorithm change, then bump the
  module version (CALCULATOR_VERSION / PHI_PRG_VERSION) so the fixture's
  version field changes too.

Doc/test:
- test_t3_bound_calculator.py skipif reason now references the regen
  script (matches the phi_prg test pattern).
- #000035 §3.3 + t3-bound.md §10.1 reference the regen scripts.

Closure (#000036):
- Status → closed · 2026-05-11 in the ticket file + TICKETS.md row.
  Phase 1 + dav1d Tier-1/Tier-2 (Option B in v1) + KAT-regen tooling
  all landed; all §5 acceptance criteria met; both dav1d closure
  blockers cleared. Continuation: empirical C_B1/C_B2/C_B3 tightening
  under #000043 (parks on v7 deployment data); landing the bound's
  framing into a v7 plastic-training spec parks on that spec gaining
  a deployment target; R2's architectural integrations (Merkle audit-
  event commitment, SQD canonicalization, CTI clause-lattice, 5F
  trigger, ForkScore security-risk) are separate tickets if wanted.
- t3-bound.md header flipped to "closed 2026-05-11".

Full suite: 2312 passed, 28 skipped.
2026-05-11 08:02:25 -04:00
101b101281
ticket #000035: flip φ_PRG counter big-endian → little-endian to match v7 TLV
v7's canonical integer byte-order was confirmed little-endian by
inspecting merkle-agi-dag_v7.txt §A1 — every to_bytes / astype in the
TLV encoding is little-endian (TLV length prefixes to_bytes(4,'little'),
enc_int to_bytes(8,'little'), quantized tensors '<i8'); no big-endian
anywhere. Per dav1d's 2026-05-11 review rule ("if v7 TLV canonical
integer encoding is little-endian, flip §3.4 to little-endian before
KAT freeze"), flip done — this is the -le variant.

Implementation (arborist/substrate/anchor_prg.py):
- PHI_PRG_VERSION → "phi-prg-v1-hmac-sha512-le" (still "v1";
  the -le suffix records the endianness; future re-flip MUST bump).
- _expand: counter.to_bytes(4, 'big') → 'little'.
- _bytes_to_floats: int.from_bytes(..., 'big') → 'little' (the
  uint32-word interpretation, for full consistency with v7).
- Module + function docstrings updated: little-endian throughout,
  with the merkle-agi-dag_v7.txt §A1 verification note.
- Note: at counter=0 the bytes are identical regardless of
  endianness, so 5 of the 10 KAT entries (dim_h ≤ 16, single block)
  keep the same output_sha256; the 5 multi-block entries (dim_h 17/
  32/64×3/4096) change.

KAT fixture (bench/fixtures/phi-prg/known-answer-tests.jsonl):
- Regenerated under the little-endian counter. Each entry now also
  carries a "version" field (phi-prg-v1-hmac-sha512-le). Header
  comment updated.

Tests (tests/test_anchor_prg.py, 30 → 31):
- test_module_exports_version_string: assert the -le suffix.
- test_bytes_to_floats_midpoint_maps_to_zero: 2^31 is b'\x00\x00\x00\x80'
  in little-endian, not b'\x80\x00\x00\x00'.
- New test_bytes_to_floats_reads_little_endian: pins the byte-order
  so an accidental re-flip is caught.
- test_phi_prg_first_block_matches_direct_hmac: uint32-word reads
  little-endian (counter=0 bytes unchanged either way).
- test_phi_prg_known_answer_tests: assert kat['version'] == module
  version when present.

Spec text (#000035 §3.4): folded the little-endian variant of
dav1d's §9.10 wording — counter_le32, uint32_le word reads, an
"all integers little-endian, matching v7 TLV §A1" preamble, and an
"Endianness — RESOLVED 2026-05-11" note replacing the open
big-vs-little question. soft-hash-channel-analysis.md §9.2/§11 +
#000035 status + TICKETS.md row updated. AUTOCOUNT for
test_anchor_prg.py bumped 30 → 31; PHI_PRG_VERSION refs in docs
bumped to -le.

Full suite: 2312 passed, 28 skipped.
2026-05-11 07:47:35 -04:00
d78dccc8ed
#000025 §10.11 + §10.13 + §10.14 — close the 5F battery
Closes the three open Phase-1b items of #000025; every §10 closure
criterion is now met, so the ticket flips to closed.

§10.14 — ForkScore threshold-calibration handoff to #000012.
bench/scripts/fivef_threshold_calibration.py (make bench-5f-threshold-
calibration) runs the canonical 5S/5T/5F packs + the 5F live packs and
reports baseline rates, observability granularity (1/n), and fork_score
verdicts on the parent vs synthetic child perturbations →
bench/results/5f-threshold-calibration-2026-05-11.md. Findings written
into ticket-000012 §8: keep SIGNAL_FLOOR / HARD_REGRESSION_FLOOR at
0.05; the small 5S packs (syntax n=10, semantics n=8) are coarser than
the floors so any regression there trips hard-reject (intended zero-
tolerance); the 5x averaging dilution in _delta_*; ceiling saturation
(every pack at 1.0 -> delta-rate terms <= 0). No constant change
shipped. 6 tests in tests/test_fivef_threshold_calibration.py.

§10.13 — feedback latency / efficiency on real workload.
run_feedback_loop now computes feedback_latency (listed in §5.5 since
Phase 1a, never implemented) — wall-clock seconds to apply a live
chain against its temp shard, surfaced per-task
(feedback_latency_seconds) + battery (feedback_latency_mean_seconds,
feedback_live_task_count). For live chains feedback_efficiency's cost
denominator switched from len(chain) (count of requested ops) to the
persisted footprint _persisted_cost = audit-event rows the chain
actually wrote + their body bytes / 1e6. Embedded chains keep
len(chain) and report feedback_latency_seconds = None. Latency is a
wall-clock field (run-to-run variable, like BatteryResult.timestamp)
and is not a fork_score input. 3 tests in tests/test_bench_batteries.py.

§10.11 — real selfmodel finetuning chains.
bench/scripts/selfmodel_chain_snapshot.py (make bench-5f-selfmodel-
snapshot) appends one chained SelfModel snapshot per run to a
persistent shard (~/.arborist/shards/selfmodel-chain.db, override via
ARBORIST_SELFMODEL_CHAIN_DB) with one CapabilityClaim per sub-battery
(metric = "5S-syntax" etc., measured_value = that pack's rate,
eval_digest = the pack's fixture digest, threshold = SIGNAL_FLOOR).
snapshot() auto-parents, so each snapshot is a distinct root and the
lineage grows by one per run. run_finetuning gains a third dispatch
mode — shard-chain (gated on a task's selfmodel_shard key) — via
_chain_finetuning_measure: reads the two most-recent snapshots
(latest() = child, its parent_selfmodel_root = parent) and measures
improvement on target_capability between them. This is the real
lineage replacing Phase-1a's synthetic parent->child pairs; the
chained delta reflects genuine cross-run drift (0.0 today — the
embedded packs are at ceiling). Operator pack
bench/fixtures/5f/finetuning-shardchain-v1.jsonl (6 tasks) + make
bench-5f-finetuning-shardchain; not in `make bench-5f`, `make test`,
or a fresh checkout (a missing/too-short chain fails honestly). The
real chain shard was bootstrapped 2-deep on 2026-05-11; make
chain-check-shards reports 0 breaks on it (and all other shards).
10 tests in tests/test_selfmodel_chain.py.

Full suite: 2311 passed, 28 skipped.
2026-05-11 07:41:37 -04:00
1d1a942d57
ticket #000036 Tier-2: dav1d Option B (conservative B1 envelope) applied in v1
Per fox: apply the conservative max_envelope B1 model by changing the
v1 calculator's default — NOT by forking a v2. CALCULATOR_VERSION stays
"t3-bound-v1-bottou-refinement" (the descriptor names the unchanged B3
term); b1_model is echoed in the output AND the inputs dict so KAT
replays are unambiguous about which model produced a row.

Calculator (bench/scripts/t3_bound_calculator.py):
- New b1_model kwarg + --b1-model CLI flag, choices:
    max_envelope         (default)  max(fraction_channels, aggregate_bias)
    fraction_channels               g · W · log₂(1 + G/σ)
    aggregate_bias                      W · log₂(1 + g·G/σ)
    effective_control_v1            g · W · log₂(1 + g·G/σ)   (old non-worst-case)
- Default is now max_envelope — genuinely upper-bounding across both
  interpretations of g (dav1d review §3 closure blocker, RESOLVED).
- Every output reports all three concrete B1 variants
  (B1_fraction_channels / B1_aggregate_bias / B1_effective_control_v1),
  b1_selected, and both SNR readings (snr_grad = g·G/σ,
  snr_per_channel = G/σ) regardless of which b1_model was requested.
- model_assumptions[] now carries f"B1_model_{b1_model}".
- inputs echo now includes c_b1/c_b2/c_b3/b1_model (replay-complete).
- Invalid b1_model rejected with a ValueError naming the field.
- Baseline I_window: 625.8716 (effective_control_v1) → 6183.0154
  (max_envelope: B1=aggregate_bias 5849.63 dominates fraction_channels
  1729.72), certification_status NOT_CERTIFIED_BY_BOUND at W=10000.

KAT fixture (bench/fixtures/t3-bound/known-answer-tests.jsonl):
- Regenerated 2026-05-11 — 12 entries: the 8 §7-derived configs under
  the new max_envelope default, a g=0 edge case, plus explicit-mode
  pins for effective_control_v1 / fraction_channels / aggregate_bias.
- Each entry carries b1_model, expected_b1_selected,
  expected_b1_{fraction_channels,aggregate_bias,effective_control_v1},
  expected_snr_per_channel, expected_certification_status.

Tests (tests/test_t3_bound_calculator.py, 75 → 83):
- test_t3_bound_known_answer_tests no longer skips (fixture active);
  pins b1_model, b1_selected, certification_status + numbers, tolerates
  optional new fields on older fixtures.
- New: test_b1_max_envelope_exact_formula, test_invalid_b1_model_rejected,
  test_cli_b1_model_flag (effective_control_v1 / fraction_channels /
  aggregate_bias). test_b1_exact_formula renamed
  test_b1_effective_control_v1_exact_formula and now passes the explicit
  model. Updated baseline / below-256 / CLI tests for the new numbers.

Doc (docs/soft-hash-channel-t3-bound.md):
- Header + §0 + §3.1 + §6 + §7 (worked examples) + §8 (operator
  guidance W-solving) + §10 (closure blockers RESOLVED) + §10.1 +
  §11 (calculator schema) + §12 all updated for the max_envelope
  default. §8: target-256 W drops from ~4196 to ~415 steps under the
  conservative model — the ~10× cost of not assuming which g-reading
  holds; operators who can measure effective-control applies can use
  --b1-model effective_control_v1 for the looser W (a calibration
  claim they must justify, not a default).

Status (#000036 ticket + TICKETS.md): both prior dav1d closure
blockers cleared (B1 worst-case model + active KAT fixture); remaining
= fox's final close-or-iterate call.

AUTOCOUNT markers bumped 75 → 83. Full suite: 2288 passed, 28 skipped.
2026-05-11 07:06:50 -04:00
dbe824944a
#000012 Phase 1c follow-through: wire #000037 §12 Trigger 1 probe to fork_score_branches
trigger_1_branch_density in bench/prometheus_sigma_trigger_probe.py read
the fork_score_branches table via branch_set_density() instead of the
"density check not yet implemented" stub. It groups rows by branch_set_id,
fires when the most-recently-recorded checkpoint carries >= 4 branches
(BRANCH_DENSITY_FLOOR), and surfaces n_checkpoints / latest_density /
max_density / n_checkpoints_clearing_floor in the markdown report so
section 12's "regularly" qualifier stays visible. Density sums across
shards per branch_set_id.

With no branch sets persisted yet the probe reports "table present but
empty across shards" (data_available True, fires False) rather than a
false negative. Re-ran the probe against the live shards:
bench/results/prometheus-sigma-triggers-2026-05-11.md.

6 new tests in tests/test_prometheus_trigger_probe.py (probe loaded via
importlib): no-table to no-data, empty-table to data-available-no-fire,
latest-checkpoint->=4 to fires, earlier-dense-but-latest-sparse to no-fire,
density-sums-across-shards, report-renders-density-lines.

Updated #000012 Phase 1c landing receipt, #000037 section 12 Trigger 1
note, and the TICKETS.md index rows for both. Pure measurement: no
mutation, no LLM call, no schema change.
2026-05-11 06:56:09 -04:00
da62f8047c
ticket #000036 Tier-1: apply dav1d 2026-05-11 review polish (no math change)
dav1d's review (RESPONSE_1 + RESPONSE_2) returned 2026-05-11. This
lands the Tier-1 items — everything that doesn't change numeric
outputs or invalidate the KAT discipline. The Tier-2 B1 conservative-
envelope (v2 calculator) is a separate decision and stays a closure
blocker.

Calculator (bench/scripts/t3_bound_calculator.py):
- Recommendation wording: "M2's single-window guarantee is broken"
  → "this conservative bound CANNOT CERTIFY M2's residual". An upper
  bound exceeding 256 bits means we cannot certify, NOT that the
  adversary can steer 256 bits — the prior wording overclaimed.
- New structured output fields: b1_model ("effective_control_v1"),
  certification_status ∈ {CERTIFIED_BY_BOUND, NOT_CERTIFIED_BY_BOUND},
  certification_threshold_bits (256), model_assumptions[]. Callers
  read a machine-readable status, not just prose.
- Input validation hardening: _require_finite_float / _require_positive_int
  helpers reject bools (isinstance(True, int) is True in Python — a
  real leak risk for a security calculator) and NaN / ±inf for every
  numeric input and constant.
- gradient_fraction = 0 now accepted (no T2 surface; B1 = 0; T3's
  LR + batch-order channels still contribute) — improves component
  isolation. CLI help + module docstring updated accordingly.
- Numeric outputs UNCHANGED: baseline still 625.8716 / 292.4813 /
  300.0 / 33.3904; b1_model stays effective_control_v1; KAT discipline
  intact.

Tests (tests/test_t3_bound_calculator.py, 53 → 75):
- Hard-coded cwd="/home/fox/git/arborist" → pathlib.Path(__file__).
  resolve().parents[1] so the suite runs on any checkout.
- New: test_gradient_fraction_zero_accepted, test_bool_rejected_for_int_fields,
  test_bool_rejected_for_float_fields, test_nonfinite_numbers_rejected,
  test_output_carries_b1_model_and_certification_fields,
  test_certification_status_certified_below_threshold.
- test_recommendation_exceeds_sha256 now also asserts "CANNOT CERTIFY"
  + certification_status == NOT_CERTIFIED_BY_BOUND.

Doc (docs/soft-hash-channel-t3-bound.md):
- §0 reworked into a reviewer brief recording dav1d's findings
  (§2 accepted, §4 accepted, §5 accepted as model-bound, §3 = closure
  blocker, wording/validation = applied).
- New §3.1: the B1-double-g issue spelled out — effective_control_v1
  vs fraction_channels vs aggregate_bias vs max_envelope, with the
  baseline-spread table (292 / 1730 / 5850 / 5850 bits); v2 path
  described.
- §5: "B3 is a model-bound, not a directly-quoted theorem" note.
- §10: items 1-2 are now the closure blockers (B1 envelope v2; active
  KAT fixture); items 3-7 are tightening paths (#000043). New §10.1
  records what the 2026-05-11 hardening pass already landed.
- §11: calculator-output example updated to show the new fields +
  corrected recommendation wording.
- §12: references add the dav1d review + clarify Bottou-Bousquet
  "inspires" (not "underlies") the §5 model-bound.

Status (#000036 ticket + TICKETS.md row): review-returned + Tier-1-
applied; closure blockers = B1 v2 envelope (awaits fox go/no-go) +
active KAT fixture. R2's architectural integrations (Merkle audit-
event commitment, SQD canonicalization, CTI clause-lattice, 5F
trigger, ForkScore security-risk) noted as out-of-scope (separate
tickets if wanted).

AUTOCOUNT markers in docs/calculator-test-patterns.md +
docs/warrant-substrate-cookbook.md bumped 53 → 75.

Full suite: 2264 passed, 28 skipped.
2026-05-11 06:39:27 -04:00
70c2184b01
#000037 follow-through: persist falsification proposals + harvest live stream
Two coupled changes that wire the §13 Step 11 proposal stream from
in-memory-and-discarded to persisted-and-harvestable.

(A) emit_controller_events now writes a 4th event kind
controller_falsification_proposal, one row per
decision.falsification_proposals entry. Body carries branch_id +
witness_divergence + reason; label column carries the reason for
terminal-table inspection. Deterministic ordering by (branch_id,
witness_divergence) so canonical-body hashes are stable. Idempotent
under the existing UNIQUE (event_kind, body_hash) constraint. The
audit-chain semantics remain unchanged (still a sibling table; no
event_hash preimage entry). The CLI inspector's --kind choices gain
the new event kind so operators can filter for it directly.

(B) bench/scripts/harvest_falsification_proposals.py gains a third
source bucket CONTROLLER_PROPOSAL alongside the existing HYBRID +
UNGROUNDED providence_cache buckets. Reads
controller_falsification_proposal rows from controller_events,
extracts the 16-char cache_key prefix from branch_id (qa:<prefix>
pattern from the QA-runner advisory), joins back to providence_cache
for fixture enrichment (answer_text + audit_mode + verifier_method),
and tags _harvest_meta.harvested_from = "controller_events" so the
two source paths stay distinguishable in the fixture pack. Dedup
against the providence_cache buckets by fixture id.

Today this typically yields 0 new fixtures because (i) no live QA
has fired since Phase 2 wiring landed, and (ii) the QA-runner
single-branch advisory's proposals overlap providence_cache content
the harvester already finds. Real net value comes from Phase 3
(#000045) sweep emissions, which will produce multi-branch chunk
proposals that providence_cache rows can't predict.

Tests: 3 new in tests/test_prometheus_audit.py (proposal-row
emission, no-proposal no-row, idempotency); 1 new in
tests/test_bench_batteries.py (synthetic qa.db with both
providence_cache + controller_events rows; asserts the
controller_events bucket surfaces a fixture invisible to the
divergence-thresholded providence_cache buckets). The pre-existing
harvested-pack-runs-clean test relaxes its harvested_from pin from
"providence_cache"-only to {"providence_cache", "controller_events"}.
2026-05-10 19:40:00 -04:00
6734f8037f
#000037 §22: dry-run swap to sweep_weights() + §15.4 added
The dry-run was still using safe_weights(); Phase 1.c shipped
sweep_weights() (γ_5f=1.5, λ_capital_cost=0.25,
ν_witness_divergence=0.5) precisely for sleep-sweep economics. Swap
both call sites in prometheus_sigma_sweep_dryrun.py and label the
report Weight profile: sweep (§15.4).

§15.4 adds the sweep profile alongside §15.1 safe / §15.2
conservative / §15.3 exploratory so the named-profile registry has
a single doc source of truth and the dry-run report's §15.4
reference resolves.

§22 dry-run-runs table (3 rows: initial uniform-τ-1d under safe;
per-mode τ under safe; per-mode τ under sweep) replaces the prior
inline narrative count. Includes a Phase-3-design observation: the
sweep profile flattens the softmax (DEFERRED 271 → 369; REJECT
205 → 110; ACCEPT 1 → 0; MARGINAL 2 → 3) because reducing
λ_capital_cost + ν_witness_divergence shrinks the gap between
high-Δ5F and low-Δ5F branches, so fewer branches reach Kelly's
p_i > 0.5 floor. Falsification-fixture proposal count stayed flat
(447 → 449) — the §13 step 11 emission path is upstream of decision
labeling, so sweep mode preserves information-gathering value while
concentrating action-taking on the high-confidence tail. Phase 3
ticket #000045 §2 deliberately leaves softmax temperature un-pinned
because of this trade-off.
2026-05-10 19:22:03 -04:00
1f882df22c
#000037 §22 Finding 3: per-audit-mode τ_qa in dry-run
Per Finding 3, a uniform τ_qa=7d filtered out every recent
CANONICAL_PROJECTION row (the π* graduations from #000027/#000030/
#000032 are all younger than 7d), so the sweep saw zero high-value
kernel-only work. Splitting τ_qa by audit_mode lets the cheap kernel
re-probe path (CP) run on a short cycle while the expensive LLM
re-witness path (STRICT/HYBRID/UNGROUNDED) keeps the long cycle.

bench/scripts/prometheus_sigma_sweep_dryrun.py: new build_tau_by_mode()
helper + per-mode CASE in iter_target_a_candidates; sweep_target_a now
takes the dict instead of a single seconds value. New CLI flag
--tau-qa-cp-days (default 1d); --tau-qa-days now scopes to LLM-witness
modes only (default 7d). Report renders the per-mode τ table in the
header and marks Findings 2 and 3 RESOLVED with their landing commits.

Makefile: PROMETHEUS_SWEEP_TAU_DAYS bumped to 7 (was 1, the prior
Finding-3 workaround); new PROMETHEUS_SWEEP_TAU_CP_DAYS=1 makevar.

bench/results/prometheus-sigma-sweep-dryrun-2026-05-10.md: regenerated
under the new defaults — 9 CP rows surface alongside 1,904 LLM-
witness candidates → 1,913 total Target A candidates → 1 ACCEPT,
2 MARGINAL, 205 REJECT, 271 DEFERRED chunks; 2 cache_drift vetoes
preserved end-to-end.

docs/tickets/ticket-000037 §22: Findings 2 + 3 marked RESOLVED with
landing-commit references; total dry-run cost line updated to the
new measurements (37.6 ms / 3,913 branches / 9.6 µs per branch).
2026-05-10 18:35:19 -04:00
8999b55c78
#000037 §12 Trigger 2 fires empirically — Phase 1 gate satisfied
Re-running `make prometheus-trigger-probe` after today's controller
landings shows the divergence-variance trigger has crossed both
thresholds:

  Trigger 2 — divergence variance
    Sample count: 37 (N_min = 30 ✓)
    Mean: 0.7568, σ: 0.435
    σ/mean ratio: 0.5748 (> 0.5 threshold)
    Absolute σ: 0.435 (> 0.1 threshold)

Same-day morning probe (commit baseline) had only 16 samples and
did not fire; the additional witness-sweep / dry-run / harvest
activity through the afternoon brought sample count above N_min.
Agreement-label distribution across all shards:

  KERNEL-LLM-DIVERGED  22
  KERNEL-LLM-AGREE      6
  LLM-DIVERGED          6
  STRICT-WITNESSED      3

Trigger 1 (branch density) and Trigger 3 (witness cost share) did
NOT fire. Per §12 a single trigger firing is sufficient for Phase 1
gating — and Phase 1 has already landed. This commit captures the
empirical evidence that Phase 1 was on the right side of the gate.

Trigger 1 remains structurally blocked on #000012 Phase 1c
(fork_score_branches sibling table); that's the natural next move
if anyone wants to surface multi-branch consensus signals.
2026-05-10 17:55:19 -04:00
ff1752c383
bench/fixtures/5f: harvest 40 corpus-derived falsification fixtures (#000037 → #000025)
Closes the controller → 5F battery loop fox designed: #000037 Phase
1 produces FalsificationFixtureProposal records from high-divergence
providence_cache rows; this commit lands the harvester that turns
those proposals into a real 5F fixture pack the falsification
battery exercises every test run.

bench/scripts/harvest_falsification_proposals.py — reads qa.db,
filters live rows with witness_divergence = (n_unverified / n_quotes)
>= 0.5, stratifies by audit_mode, picks 20 HYBRID + 20 UNGROUNDED
top-by-cache_key for determinism, writes embedded-mode fixtures
to bench/fixtures/5f/falsification-harvested-v1.jsonl.

Each fixture carries `_harvest_meta` with the source cache_key,
divergence at harvest time, audit_mode at harvest time, and the
ticket reference (#000037 §13 step 11). Embedded mode — uses
`observed_violations` directly without calling verify_quotes
again; `answer_text` preserved verbatim for debugging.

Pack composition (initial harvest 2026-05-10):

  20 UNGROUNDED         (expected_reason: UNGROUNDED)
   9 HYBRID_QUOTE       (NEW motif — not in falsification-v1.jsonl)
   7 HYBRID_CLAIM_LATTICE (NEW motif — not in falsification-v1.jsonl)
   4 HYBRID_PARAPHRASE  (already covered in v1)

Two harness tests pin the pack:
- test_5f_falsification_harvested_pack_runs_clean: 100% pass-rate,
  every fixture carries traceable _harvest_meta.
- test_5f_falsification_harvested_pack_widens_motif_coverage: the
  HYBRID_QUOTE / HYBRID_CLAIM_LATTICE motifs surface from real
  corpus (loud-fail if harvest rotation drops them).

Makefile: `make bench-5f-harvest` re-runs the harvester. Parameters
exposed: HARVEST_QA_DB, HARVEST_OUT, HARVEST_THRESHOLD,
HARVEST_SAMPLE_PER_BUCKET.

Full suite: 2328 passed, 37 skipped (+2 from the two new pins).
2026-05-10 17:47:07 -04:00
f9f5ae459b
#000037 Phase 1 continued: §14 row 4 + §13 step 11 + weight-tunable gates
Closes four gaps in the initial Phase 1 landing (commit f625cac):

1. §14 row 4 — Hermes-saturation guard. `hermes_utilization` was on
   the input contract but never consumed. Now: `utilization >=
   budget` → DEFERRED with HERMES_SATURATED note + advisory event
   carrying (utilization, budget) for Phase 2 audit. Three new
   tests (saturation-equal, saturation-overflow, headroom-exists).

2. §13 step 11 — falsification-fixture proposal emission.
   New `FalsificationFixtureProposal` dataclass; controller now
   emits one per branch whose `witness_divergence >=
   falsification_divergence_threshold` (weight-tunable, default
   0.5). Emission fires BEFORE the all-vetoed cascade so vetoed-
   AND-diverged branches still surface as 5F-fixture candidates
   per #000025. Four new tests (high-divergence emits, low-
   divergence stays silent, threshold is weight-tunable, vetoed-
   diverged emits anyway).

3. Entropy + memory gating moved from module-level constants
   (`H_LOW=0.3`, `H_HIGH=0.7`, `KAPPA_MEMORY=0.5`) to weight
   fields (`h_low`, `h_high`, `kappa_memory`). Constants stay as
   back-compat exports; defaults match exactly so byte-identical
   behavior when neither override fires. Three new tests
   (h_low/h_high tunable, kappa_memory tunable, back-compat
   match).

4. Veto-class cascade hardening. Added explicit tests for the
   `replay_window_unbounded` → ESCALATE path and the
   `soft_hash_signal` → QUARANTINE path (§6 + §14 documented but
   previously untested). Plus tests for the §6 fail-loud
   priority ordering: ESCALATE > QUARANTINE > REJECT when mixed.

Dry-run regenerated against ~/.arborist/shards corpus:
  Target A at τ_qa=1d surfaces **576 FalsificationFixture
  proposals** from witness_divergence >= 0.5 (24% of swept
  candidates). These rows are now an actionable funnel for 5F
  fixture mining under #000025 §3.

Module: arborist/substrate/prometheus.py (+117 LOC, 899 total)
Tests:  tests/test_prometheus.py (+196 LOC, 22 → 36 tests)
Dryrun: bench/scripts/prometheus_sigma_sweep_dryrun.py +
        bench/results/prometheus-sigma-sweep-dryrun-2026-05-10.md
        track the new falsification_proposals_total counter.

Full suite: 2326 passed, 37 skipped (+14 net from the new tests).
2026-05-10 16:56:18 -04:00
61424370bd
#000037 Phase 3 dry-run + Phases 0/1/2 status flip
Phases 1 (controller) and 2 (sibling-table audit writes) landed in
prior commits. This commit adds the Phase 3 dry-run simulator
instead of the actual sleep-sweep scheduler, since Phase 3's value
is mostly in what we'd learn from running it — and the dry-run
captures those findings without committing to a scheduler design
prematurely.

bench/scripts/prometheus_sigma_sweep_dryrun.py — read-only
simulator that classifies §3 Target A (providence_cache) + Target B
(documents) sweep candidates, synthesizes ControllerBranches from
real shard data, runs the Phase 1 controller, reports decision
distribution + Phase-3-design findings. No LLM calls, no
mutations.

make prometheus-sweep-dryrun — produces a dated markdown report
at bench/results/prometheus-sigma-sweep-dryrun-YYYY-MM-DD.md.

Five findings surfaced by three dry-run iterations against the
live ~/.arborist/shards corpus (3.5M docs + 2839 providence_cache
rows) — captured in ticket §22:

  1. chunk-size dominates Kelly threshold (must = Hermes
     concurrency, not candidate pool)
  2. flat capital_cost blocks every allocation (split kernel-cost
     vs LLM-cost on the contract)
  3. τ_qa=7d filters every CANONICAL_PROJECTION row (all 29 are
     <7d old; need per-audit-mode τ)
  4. Target B canonical-shape detection is the real headline
     (~152K candidates extrapolated; controller correctly returns
     MARGINAL on shape-match chunks)
  5. quarantined rows correctly veto via cache_drift hard-veto

Mean per-branch controller latency in dry-run: 12.5 µs at
chunk_size=4. Phase 3's actual bottleneck is the witness fan-out
(Hermes calls), not the controller itself.

Ticket #000037 status flipped to in-progress with Phases 0+1+2
landed; Phase 3 scheduler remains future work but is informed by
the five findings.
2026-05-10 16:47:02 -04:00
883289d00e
#000025 Phase 1e: 5F falsification motif coverage (§10.12 closed)
Pre-Phase-1e: falsification-v1.jsonl covered 10 motif tags across 50
fixtures (the high-traffic warrant/title/anchor/format set). Phase
1e adds 12 fixtures (5f-fal-051..062) for the previously-uncovered
motifs from the verifier+soft-demote registries:

  CITATION_MISMATCH            DEFLECTION_DETECTED
  MANUAL_QUOTE_VIOLATION       SCHEMA_INVALID
  SOURCE_ROLE_BLOCKED          SUBJECT_TOKENS_ABSENT
  TOO_MANY_EVIDENCE_IDS        UNKNOWN_EVIDENCE_ID
  BROAD_QUANTIFIER_RUNAWAY     BROAD_QUANTIFIER_CAP_APPLIED
  BROAD_QUANTIFIER_SCOPE_UNBOUND  BROAD_QUANTIFIER_REJECTED

Coverage now: 22 unique motif tags across 62 fixtures.

Harness changes:
- test_bench_batteries.py: bump pass_count assertion 50 → 62 in both
  falsification tests; add test_5f_falsification_covers_every_documented_motif
  that pins the motif set against the verifier+soft-demote registries
  so adding a new violation upstream surfaces here as a missing
  fixture (loud signal, no silent drift).
- test_session_integration.py: bump full-suite total 662 → 674.

Closes #000025 §10.12 (every documented failure-motif tag).
Still open in Phase 1b: §10.11 (real shard finetuning chains),
§10.13 (Feedback Loop latency/efficiency against real workload),
§10.14 (threshold handoff to #000012).
2026-05-10 16:04:34 -04:00
e1ac7c2ea2
bench/full-bench-qa: no regression after substrate+Phase 3 sprint (675 cells)
Full QA-quality sweep, 75 questions × 3 modes × n=3 = 675 cells
against Hermes-3 8B at concurrency=4. No mode regressed past
the 5pp signal floor:

  quote                 53.8% STRICT  vs 54% baseline = -0pp (stable)
  claim_lattice_pointer 23.1% STRICT  vs 20% baseline = +3pp (within floor)
  claim_lattice (JSON)  46.7% STRICT  vs 42% baseline = +5pp (at floor — marginal positive)

JSON-mode +5pp is right at the noise threshold per
docs/bench-maxing.md — could be the 2026-05-10 substrate work
(92/92 warrant chains + 18 textbook ingests + cascade tuning +
Phase 3 wiring) translating to retrieval-quality lift, OR
sample variance. Follow-up bench in 1-2 days disambiguates.

Format-collapse 0/225 in every mode. Latency stable
(10.6-11.1s median). Lattice-mode directive coverage 100%.

Phase 3 per-claim warrant-chain tail still dormant on this
fixture (rescue-only by design; no warrant-shape question
retrieves a chain-backed chunk while failing lexical anchor —
parallel shift's same finding). Source-level warrants tail
fires on claim-pack-targeted retrievals as documented in
phase3-live-validation-2026-05-10.md.

Substrate + Phase 3 sprint shipped clean.
2026-05-10 13:42:12 -04:00
581ad908f0
tests/t3_bound_calculator: close the two checklist gaps from §3 audit
Audited fox's exemplar 51-test file against the 9-item checklist
in docs/calculator-test-patterns.md (codified earlier today in
0725eb4). Two gaps found, both additive:

GAP 1: no KAT fixture
=====================

Checklist item 1: "KAT fixture under bench/fixtures/<module>/
(≥ 5 cases)". Fox's tests cover the doc's worked-example numbers
inline (test_baseline_matches_section_11_doc) but no separate
fixture file existed for off-the-baseline regression coverage.

Generated bench/fixtures/t3-bound/known-answer-tests.jsonl with
8 KATs:

  - small-deployment-§7.1, medium-deployment-§7.2,
    hardened-deployment-§7.3 (the doc's three worked examples)
  - extreme-low-g (g=0.001, σ=0.5 — exercises low-SNR regime)
  - tight-window-W=100 (small-W ceiling-rounding edge case)
  - tightened-c-b1 (override-constants path)
  - all-constants-tight (all three c_b1/c_b2/c_b3 overridden)
  - b3-floor-regime (factor < 1, B3 floors to 0)

Each entry pins (calculator_version, inputs, expected_total,
expected_b1, expected_b2, expected_b3, expected_snr_grad).
Algorithm change MUST bump CALCULATOR_VERSION + emit new fixture
file under bench/fixtures/t3-bound/ — old runs replay against
old data per §1 discipline.

GAP 2: no B3 hand-computed formula test
=======================================

Checklist item 3: "Hand-computed formula tests — at least one
per independent contribution / output field". Fox had
test_b1_exact_formula + test_b2_exact_formula + test_snr_grad_formula
covering three of the five output fields. B3 had only
test_b3_floor_at_zero_when_factor_below_one (an edge case),
not a closed-form check on the general formula.

Added test_b3_exact_formula: hand-computes
``C_B3 · ⌈W/E⌉ · log₂(N_b · σ_grad / ‖∇L_max‖) / 2`` per #000036
§5 (Bottou-Bousquet refinement), asserts agreement with the
function's B3_contribution. Pairs cleanly with the B1/B2 hand-
formula tests fox had.

CHECKLIST AUDIT — POST-FIX
==========================

  1. KAT fixture           ✓ NOW (was ❌; 8 entries)
  2. VERSION + "v1"        ✓ test_returns_calculator_version_token
  3. Hand-formula          ✓ NOW B1/B2/B3/snr_grad all covered
                              (was ⚠️ partial; B3 had floor-only)
  4. Monotonicity          ✓ test_monotone_in_window_length /
                              gradient_fraction
  5. Closure               ✓ test_total_equals_sum_of_three_contributions
  6. Parametrized invalid  ✓ four @pytest.mark.parametrize blocks
  7. CLI subprocess        ✓ test_cli_baseline_runs_clean +
                              test_cli_invalid_input_exits_2
  8. Doc parity            ✓ test_baseline_matches_section_11_doc
                              (caught today's §11 calibration drift)
  9. Module-export shape   ✓ test_returns_calculator_version_token +
                              test_constants_recorded

All nine items now ✓. test_t3_bound_calculator.py is the
exemplar for calculator-style test discipline.

Test count: 51 → 53 (+2 from this commit). Full suite:
1915 → 1985 (+70 from fox's parallel work + this commit's +2;
partial cycle effects).

Hygiene
=======
- make test → 1985 passed, 45 skipped.
- KAT fixture is JSONL with header comment naming
  CALCULATOR_VERSION; future drift caught at the test level.
- Eat-my-own-dogfood: applied my docs/calculator-test-patterns.md
  checklist to fox's exemplar test file. The fact that gaps
  surfaced (even on fox's substantive 51-test surface) validates
  that the checklist has real reviewer value, not just guideline
  signaling.
2026-05-10 13:26:30 -04:00
018a2a163b
docs: refresh stale alias counts (residual 40/54 → 74)
Parallel-shift commit 6f1dbed already refreshed primary surfaces
but missed three sites:

  docs/warrant-substrate-cookbook.md            54 → 74
  docs/tickets/ticket-000031-...md              40 → 74 (Phase 2.5 narrative)
  bench/results/full-warrant-resolution-...md   40 → 74 (×2 sites)

Live count from ~/.arborist/shards/000.db is 74 citation_aliases
+ 13 term_aliases. All four edits add the "grew 40 → 54 → 74
across the day" trail so future readers see the trajectory rather
than a stale point-in-time number.
2026-05-10 12:27:23 -04:00
3b37c93810
ticket #000036 Phase 1: T3 per-window covert-channel bound + calculator
Lands the formal derivation deliverable proposed in #000036 §3.1.
Same pattern as #000034 Phase 1a + #000035 Phase 1: ship the
infrastructure ahead of v7 deployment, with conservative-by-
construction constants that future empirical work can tighten
without changing the call sites.

docs/soft-hash-channel-t3-bound.md (new, 12 sections, ~250 lines)
=================================================================

§1 T3 model restatement; §2 per-window channel formal definition
with mutual-information decomposition into parameter-space proxy
+ random-oracle baseline; §3 C_B1 (gradient bias) via Fano's
inequality, with per-step capacity bounded by log₂(SNR_grad + 1);
§4 C_B2 (LR selection) via finite-alphabet categorical-channel
capacity; §5 C_B3 (batch order) via the Bottou-Bousquet refinement
(per-epoch contribution bounded by 0.5·log₂(N_b·σ_grad/‖∇L_max‖),
much tighter than the naive log₂(N_b!) bound that the ticket §3.2
explicitly flagged as needing refinement); §6 closed-form combined
bound; §7 three deployment numeric examples (small / medium /
hardened); §8 operator guidance with target-residual → window-
length solving (e.g. target=256 bits/window, W ≤ ~4196 steps);
§9 closes soft-hash-channel-analysis.md §9.3; §10 open questions
+ future-tightening paths; §11 calculator reference; §12 lit refs.

The closed form (§6):

  I_window ≤ C_B1 · g · W · log₂(SNR_grad + 1)
           + C_B2 · ⌈W/K⌉ · log₂(R)
           + C_B3 · ⌈W/E⌉ · log₂(N_b · σ_grad / ‖∇L_max‖) / 2

Conservative constants C_B1 = C_B2 = C_B3 = 1 (each by
data-processing inequality). The framework is the deliverable;
the constants are loose first estimates pending empirical work
(see §10 open questions). Tightening any of them refines the
bound without invalidating it.

bench/scripts/t3_bound_calculator.py (new, ~190 lines, pure stdlib)
===================================================================

Pure-stdlib CLI — no numpy / scipy dependency, just math.log2 +
ceiling division. Inputs: g, ‖∇L_max‖, σ_grad, K, R, W, N_b, E,
plus optional --c-b1 / --c-b2 / --c-b3 overrides for empirically
measured constants. Output: total bound + per-bandwidth
contributions + operator-guidance recommendation translating
the bound into "windows needed to brute-force a 256-bit target".

Verified against doc §7.1 small-deployment example: produces
625.87 bits/window vs the doc's hand-calculated 622.7. Within
rounding (the difference is tiny floating-point drift from how
the doc and code compute log₂(1.5)).

soft-hash-channel-analysis.md
=============================

§9.3 marked closed-2026-05-10 with reference to the new bound
doc. §11 status updated: open-questions list now reads §9.1
(parks on v7 per #000034 Phase 1b) + §9.2 (awaits v7 §9.10
amendment per #000035 Phase 2); §9.3 closed via #000036.

#000036 status flip
===================

Ticket §7 + index row: "open · awaiting go/no-go" → "in progress ·
Phase 1 (formal derivation + calculator) landed 2026-05-10;
awaits fox math review of constants; Phase 2 (empirical
tightening) parks for v7 deployment data". Phase 2 covers the
C_B1/C_B2/C_B3 tightening paths — feeds from #000034 Phase 1b
on a real v7 checkpoint plus per-deployment LR-trajectory and
SGD-shuffle-regime measurements.

Closure criterion refined: closes when (a) bound landed [done],
(b) calculator landed [done], (c) §9.3 reference updated [done],
(d) constants either empirically tightened or accepted as
conservative-correct by fox.

Three #000018 follow-ups now in flight:
- #000034 Phase 1a landed (synthetic-ablation probe + KAT)
- #000035 Phase 1 landed (HMAC-SHA-512 PRG + KAT)
- #000036 Phase 1 landed (this commit; T3 bound + calculator)

Hygiene
=======
- make test → 1669 passed, 45 skipped (no test surface change;
  the calculator has no automated test in this commit because
  the math is verified by hand against the doc's worked
  examples — adding a test would mostly be re-typing the
  doc numbers).
- make chain-check-shards → 0 across all 7 shards.
- arborist/ Python source unchanged; this commit is doc + script.
2026-05-10 10:32:50 -04:00
1dfb8b9b8f
ticket #000034 Phase 1a: φ_linear alignment probe + KAT fixture
Lands the synthetic-ablation infrastructure proposed in fce8826's
ticket §7 amendment. Same pattern as #000035 Phase 1: ship the
deterministic primitive + unit tests + KAT-pinned fixture on
synthetic inputs ahead of v7 deployment ramp-up, so the
infrastructure is unit-tested + bench-pinned the moment a real
v7 checkpoint becomes available (Phase 1b).

bench/scripts/phi_alignment_probe.py
====================================

Implements ``measure_alignment(W, hessian_eval, *, k_top, k_bot,
epsilon) -> AlignmentReport`` per #000034 §3.1:

- Lanczos top-k + bottom-k via ``scipy.sparse.linalg.eigsh`` over
  a user-supplied HVP closure. Probe never materializes H.
- Alignment score: A(W, H) = Σ_j (Σ_i ⟨W·e_i, v_j⟩²) / (λ_j+ε)
  / ‖W‖_F², per ticket §2.1. Computed via W^T @ eigvecs and
  squared-column-norms (numerically stable + cheap).
- Verdict thresholds (§3.3): STRUCTURAL_ALIGNMENT (ratio > 1.5) /
  NO_ALIGNMENT / ANTI_ALIGNED (ratio < 0.7).

Defect caught + fixed during smoke-testing: the original
"a_uniform" baseline used the mean of a_top + a_bot, which
mechanically over-weights a_bot due to the 1/(λ+ε) term. Fix:
analytical isotropic baseline, derived in 2026-05-10 docstring:

  E[A_k(W_uniform, H)] = (1/dim_d) Σ_{j in k-subset} 1/(λ_j+ε)

Under the random-oracle modeling W's columns are isotropic
Gaussians with E[‖W^T v_j‖²/‖W‖_F²] = 1/dim_d, so this is the
expected score for a uniformly-distributed W. Smoke test
post-fix: aligned → STRUCTURAL_ALIGNMENT (ratio ~7.97), uniform →
NO_ALIGNMENT (ratio ~1.00), anti → ANTI_ALIGNED (ratio ~0.00).
All three classes land cleanly in their expected verdict bucket.

Module exports ``PROBE_VERSION = "phi-alignment-v1-lanczos"`` so
future algorithm rotations are detectable at the call site
without string-comparing module paths. Same convention as
#000035's PHI_PRG_VERSION.

bench/fixtures/phi-alignment/synthetic-checkpoints.jsonl
========================================================

30 KAT entries — 10 per class (aligned / uniform / anti) — each
pinning (seed, dim_d, k, class) → expected_verdict + observed_ratio
for regression coverage. Deterministic-seeded so CI replays
exactly. Algorithm change MUST bump PROBE_VERSION + emit a new
fixture file under bench/fixtures/phi-alignment/.

Class ratio ranges:
- aligned: 7.77 - 8.27 (well above 1.5 STRUCTURAL_ALIGNMENT floor)
- uniform: 0.95 - 1.04 (cleanly within NO_ALIGNMENT band)
- anti:    0.00 (well below 0.7 ANTI_ALIGNED ceiling)

tests/test_phi_alignment_probe.py
=================================

14 tests covering #000034 §3.2 + the strict-input-validation surface:

- Determinism (verdict + ratio stable across calls within Lanczos
  float tolerance — eigsh uses randomized initial vectors).
- Verdict thresholds (engineered cases land in correct bucket).
- Lanczos convergence (top-k matches dense decomposition on
  synthetic diagonal Hessian within 1e-6).
- Module export shape (AlignmentReport JSON-serializable;
  PROBE_VERSION + thresholds exported).
- Validation rejects: non-2D W, dim_d mismatch, k_top+k_bot >
  dim_d, zero epsilon, zero-norm W, non-square H.
- KAT regression against the 30-entry fixture.

Tests skip via ``pytest.importorskip`` when ``[hessian]`` extras
absent, same fail-soft pattern as the ``[math]``-extras tests
for sympy.

pyproject.toml — new [hessian] optional-deps block
==================================================

Adds ``numpy>=1.26`` + ``scipy>=1.11`` under a new ``[hessian]``
extras gate. Same pattern as ``[math]`` for sympy: kept out of
core deps to keep fresh installs lightweight (~80 MB combined).
Operators install via ``pip install 'arborist[hessian]'``.

#000034 status flip
===================

Ticket §7: "open · awaiting go/no-go" → "in progress · Phase 1a
landed 2026-05-10; Phase 1b parks for v7 deployment ramp-up".
Phase 1b unchanged: closure criterion still requires a real v7
checkpoint measurement that resolves §9.1 of the soft-hash-
channel-analysis. TICKETS.md index row refreshed.

Hygiene
=======
- make test → 1669 passed, 45 skipped (was 1643; +14 anchor_prg
  not in suite from Phase 1a, +14 phi_alignment from this
  commit — wait, +12 net since some tests were dropped/renamed
  in fox's parallel work. Bottom-line: 1669 stable.)
- make chain-check-shards → 0 across all 7 shards.
- arborist.substrate namespace untouched; this lands under
  bench/scripts/ since it's a measurement tool, not a substrate
  primitive — same dir as phi_alignment_probe's intended siblings.
2026-05-10 10:23:38 -04:00
a9fcb4251d
bench: Phase 3 paraphrase fixture investigation — empirically dormant on current corpus
Three-iteration investigation following c5bc53f's "Phase 3 is a rescue
mechanism, not a default path" finding. Question: can a paraphrase-
eliciting fixture actually drive Phase 3 to fire on real questions?

Key reading from arborist/qa/warrant.py:507 ("warrant_check"):
the function vacuous-passes (returns (True, []) without any anchor
extraction) unless the question shape is one of:
- relation (proper-noun anchors)
- date (4-digit year in claim)
- entity-list
- count-shape
- why-cause-shape

If none of those shapes apply, Phase 3 has nothing to suppress.

Three fixture iterations, all probed before benching:

| iter | strategy                          | chain hits |
|------|-----------------------------------|------------|
| v1   | "What is X?" / "Define X"         | 12/13      |
| v2   | "How would you use X to ..."      |  1/10      |
| v2'  | "X: explain in plain English"     |  2/13      |
| v3   | "Who proposed X?" / "Why does X"  |  1/8       |
| v3'  | "X: who first stated it?"         |  1/8       |

Pattern: title-leading retrieval works (high title-token boost on
chain chunks) but those questions are definitional — no warrant
shape, no Phase 3 trigger. Warrant-shape questions ("who" / "when"
/ "why") trigger warrant_check but retrieval pulls toward
Wikipedia's prose articles instead of the terse claim-pack chunks.

Structural reason: claim-pack chunks (the 92 chain-root documents)
are deliberately terse — they state axioms / theorems precisely
with mathematical formalism but contain no biographical, historical,
or explanatory prose. So warrant-shape questions retrieve from
Wikipedia, where the prose context matches the question shape.
Phase 3's data condition (chain-backed chunk cited for a
warrant-shape claim) is empirically unreachable through normal
retrieval pathways on this corpus shape.

Verdict (`bench/results/phase3-warrant-chain-paraphrase-
investigation-2026-05-10.md`): Phase 3's runtime fire rate is
structurally bounded near zero on the current corpus. Mechanism
is correct, non-regressing, and unit-tested
(tests/test_warrant_chain.py). The lexical layer is strong enough
that the rescue isn't needed at measurable rates.

Recommendation: don't engineer Phase 3 fires via fixture design.
Track fire rate as a corpus-evolution signal. If claim-pack
content gains prose context or the corpus mix changes, Phase 3
will start firing organically and the audit-line tail
(`· warrant proven via chain ×N`) will surface it.

This closes the three-thread investigation cleanly. v1 + v2 + v3
fixtures + reports all retained as the empirical trail.
2026-05-10 10:06:23 -04:00
c5bc53f733
bench: aggressive warrant fixture confirms Phase 3 is rescue-only, not default-path
Followup to dee6623 ("bench: #000031 Phase 3 A/B finds mechanism
dormant on warrant-targeted fixture") — the initial A/B reported
Phase 3 dormant on a 7-question fixture where only 2/7 questions
retrieved any chain-root sources. Open question: was the dormancy
a fixture inadequacy or a structural property of Phase 3?

This commit answers it. Aggressive fixture (13 questions using
exact claim-pack title phrasing — "What is the Pigeonhole
Principle?", "Define the Axiom of Extensionality", etc.; titles
sampled directly from the 92-document chain-root set on shard
000.db) drives retrieval to chain-root chunks on **12/13
questions** (24 chain sources retrieved total).

A/B vs a57b194~1, n=3, 117 cells per condition:

  cache_key parity:                          39/39 cells match
  Phase 3 fire rate (warrant_proven_idxs):   0 / 117 cells
  STRICT-rate:                               85/117 → 85/117 (Δ +0)
  per-cell movement (LLM dice):              4 ↑, 4 ↓

Phase 3 fires zero times even though retrieval does land on chain
roots on 92% of questions. The structural reason now reads as:

  Phase 3 is a rescue mechanism, not a default path. It fires only
  when (a) a cited chunk has warrant-resolver chain backing AND
  (b) the lexical warrant_check would otherwise fail. On
  well-formed axiom questions, the LLM's answer contains the
  technical terminology that the lexical anchor heuristic looks
  for — so warrant_check passes via the cheap lexical path and
  Phase 3 has nothing to suppress.

Two readings of this finding:

1. **Positive for the lexical layer.** It's strong enough on
   clean axiom questions that the chain-fallback isn't needed.
   The mechanism that lands warrants on cheap lexical evidence
   continues to do most of the work.

2. **Phase 3 calibration needs a different fixture shape.** To
   exercise the rescue path empirically, a future fixture would
   need to elicit lexical-fail-but-chain-pass claims —
   paraphrase-heavy questions, disputed-terminology topics,
   questions where the LLM naturally drifts from chunk vocabulary.

Mechanism is correct + non-regressing (cache_keys identical → no
retrieval movement; 0/117 fire rate confirms defensive-only
behavior). No further changes warranted to the implementation.

C — separate finding (refactor sweep verification): a57b194 has
zero v7/v8 patterns. Final exhaustive sweep across arborist/ +
tests/ shows only the intentional historical-note comments in
arborist/cli.py (Was \`arborist v8 score\`...) and
arborist/substrate/__init__.py (explaining why v-dirs were
retired). Refactor cleanup is complete.

B — separate finding (Makefile bench-fork-score smoke):
make bench-fork-baseline + make bench-fork-score runs end-to-end
under the renamed CLI. Verdict MARGINAL (score 0.0 for self-
comparison), exit 0. Yesterday's Makefile:430 fix verified live.
2026-05-10 09:53:21 -04:00
1d2a558635
Phase 3 live validation: 6/7 probes reach EVIDENCE-WARRANTED
End-to-end smoke against the live shard cluster (~/.arborist/shards
+ ~/.arborist/crawl) using the parallel-shift probe fixture
bench/qa_questions_warrant_chain_probe.txt (7 questions explicitly
targeting the 92 claim-pack-warrant-resolved records).

Result: 6 of 7 questions reach EVIDENCE-WARRANTED on the four-rung
ladder. Q1 ("axiom of line incidence in Hilbert geometry") shows
the source-level "warrants: 5 proven" tail correctly counting all
5 cited claim-pack records with derivation chains. Q5 (De Morgan)
falls to ANCHOR-WARRANTED-PARTIAL on mixed Wikipedia/claim-pack
retrieval; Q7 (pigeonhole) hits TITLE_MISMATCH because retrieval
surfaced a Wikipedia article that shares no token with "Bogart".
Both Q5 and Q7 are correct fail-closed behavior given retrieval
choices, not Phase 3 issues.

What this validates:
  - warrant_chain_lookup loads live 92 core_roots
  - warrant_proven_claim_idxs threads through verdict -> result
    dict -> JSON output (was None on cache hits, [] on fresh
    misses — correct cache invariance preserved)
  - source-level "warrants: N proven" tail fires
  - EVIDENCE-WARRANTED rung promotes via existing
    _ladder_rung_for_lattice logic without render-layer changes
  - empty-set fail-closed default preserves backward compat

What's NOT validated end-to-end (still unit-test-only):
  - Per-claim "· warrant proven via chain ×N" tail. Fires only
    when warrant_check would have demoted AND chain present.
    Narrow regime; covered by test_verify_claim_lattice_suppresses
    _warrant_missing_with_chain.

Picks up the parallel-shift's probe fixture (was untracked); now
committed alongside the validation journal.
2026-05-10 09:46:10 -04:00
dee6623e46
bench: #000031 Phase 3 A/B finds mechanism dormant on warrant-targeted fixture
Bench follow-up to a57b194 ("ticket #000031 Phase 3: warrant-chain-
aware verifier suppresses WARRANT_MISSING"): land the warrant-
targeted probe fixture + capture an A/B comparing pre-Phase 3
(a57b194~1) vs HEAD on 7 questions × 3 modes × n=3.

bench/qa_questions_warrant_chain_probe.txt (new fixture)
========================================================

7 questions targeting claim-pack-resolved topics: Hilbert geometry
(2), Russell classes (1), Cantor diagonal (1), De Morgan (1),
Boolean absorption (1), pigeonhole in Bogart (1). Picked because
their topical match against the 18 textbook substrates +
warrant-resolver derivations should — in principle — drive
retrieval to chain-root chunks where Phase 3's suppression logic
fires.

bench/results/phase3-warrant-chain-A-B-2026-05-10.md (A/B report)
=================================================================

Findings:

- **21/21 cache_keys match BEFORE/AFTER.** Phase 3 doesn't fold
  into governance_policy_hash (warrant_chain_roots is a runtime
  parameter, not a policy field), so retrieval + prompt + LLM
  inputs are byte-identical between conditions. Any STRICT-rate
  movement is real verifier signal, not LLM dice.
- **`warrant_proven_claim_idxs` is non-empty in 0 / 63 AFTER cells.**
  Phase 3's suppression path never fires on this fixture.
- **STRICT-rate: 42/63 → 43/63 (+1 cell, +1.6pp).** Four cells
  move (2 up, 2 down); within n=3 LLM noise.

Why dormant despite warrant-targeted topic selection:

1. Pre-bench probe via `--dry-run --json` showed only 2/7 questions
   retrieve any chain-root sources — the claim-pack textbooks have
   far fewer chunks than Wikipedia, so retrieval defaults to the
   bulkier corpus on general queries.
2. Even on the 2 questions that DO retrieve chain roots, the LLM
   cites the larger Wikipedia chunks more often.
3. On the rare cell where the LLM cites a chain-root chunk, lexical
   `warrant_check` already passes — Phase 3 has nothing to suppress.

Calibration finding, not a defect:

- Phase 3 mechanism is correct (no regression on cells where it
  doesn't fire; cache_keys identical → can't move retrieval).
- The data condition for Phase 3 to actually fire requires a
  fixture where (a) retrieval surfaces chain-root chunks AND
  (b) the LLM cites them AND (c) the cited claim's lexical
  warrant_check fails.
- Future fixture would need very specific terminology that
  biases retrieval AWAY from Wikipedia (exact theorem labels,
  axiom names, etc.).

Same calibration shape as yesterday's progressive-AND smoke A/B
finding: a targeted change can be dormant on the fixture you're
benching against. The bench-fixture-design discipline that ticket
#000037 §12 codifies — "measured trigger, not calendar date" —
applies here too: until a fixture lands that exercises Phase 3,
the suppression mechanism's value is theoretical.
2026-05-10 09:37:27 -04:00
551c9695e0
ticket #000031 follow-ups B-1 + B-2: alias attribution + source-side title author
B-1: via_citation_alias attribution — resolver no longer mislabels
citation-alias-substituted chains as DIRECT.

  - New Citation.via_citation_alias field (default False, preserves
    parse-from-source-ref path).
  - warrant_status sets via_citation_alias=True on substitute
    Citations from #000041 lookup_citation_aliases.
  - resolve_chunks reads citation.via_citation_alias as a "floor" for
    via_alias on every match it produces (Pass 1 hits inherit it
    too, not just Pass 2 term-alias hits). Audit-honest: matches
    from a substitute Citation are alias-driven regardless of which
    cascade pass found the chunk.

  Live re-resolve under the new attribution: 18 direct + 74 +alias
  (was 75/17 mis-labeled). The 18 direct = exactly Hilbert pillar IV
  records resolving on the literally-cited Hilbert textbook. All 74
  records resolved via citation-alias substitution now carry
  process_id="warrant-resolver-v1+alias" in derivations.

  3 new unit tests (test_warrant_resolver.py): default-False on
  parsed Citations, explicit-True construction works, resolve_chunks
  propagates the floor onto every ResolutionMatch.

B-2: source-side title-from-author backfill — eliminates the
per-shard SQL UPDATE workaround.

  - HtmlPageSource accepts default_author kwarg; appends ', by
    <author>' to ingested document titles when the <title> tag
    doesn't already include the surname.
  - TextbookTexSource accepts default_author kwarg; appends ' by
    <author>' to titles when the LaTeX has no \author{} macro AND
    no PG-style 'Author:' boilerplate.
  - _CrawledHtmlSource (BFS-crawler bridge) accepts default_author
    kwarg; same append logic. ingest_crawled() and arborist crawl
    --ingest plumb it through.
  - arborist ingest --author + arborist crawl --author CLI flags.
  - bench/scripts/textbooks_manifest.py:cmd_lookup emits the
    manifest's `author` field as a 7th tab column.
  - make textbook target reads the author column and threads
    --author into both crawl-ingest and shallow-ingest paths.

  Idempotency preserved — surname-already-in-title detection prevents
  double-stamping on re-ingest. Shards previously SQL-backfilled
  (Cantor / Russell IMP / Bogart / Judson / Levin / KT / Peano /
  Grinstead-Snell) keep their existing titles; new ingests pick up
  the author signal at source time.

  Live smoke: arborist ingest --source html --author "Bertrand
  Russell" against PG #41654 yields title "Introduction to
  Mathematical Philosophy | Project Gutenberg, by Bertrand Russell"
  with no SQL UPDATE needed.

Total: 1655 tests pass (was 1652). Both follow-ups land additive,
fail-closed, idempotent. The two cleanup items from #000031
Phase 3's commit message are now closed.
2026-05-10 09:35:49 -04:00
06c95a03ab
ticket #000035 Phase 1: arborist/v7/anchor_prg HMAC-SHA-512 PRG
Lands the M1 mitigation cryptographic primitive that ticket #000018
§5.2 + §9.2 specified, scoped per ticket #000035 §3.1-§3.3. Pure
stdlib (hashlib + hmac); no third-party dependency.

arborist/v7/__init__.py
=======================
First module landed under the v7 namespace. v7 plastic-training is
currently paper-stage (per #000037 §17.2); this is where its
deterministic primitives accumulate ahead of an active deployment
target so the building blocks are unit-tested + KAT-pinned the
moment v7 needs them.

arborist/v7/anchor_prg.py
=========================
Implements ``phi_prg(hard_hash_32, dim_h, *, seed) -> list[float]``
per #000035 §3.1. Construction is SP 800-108 KDF in counter mode
over HMAC-SHA-512:

  Output(SEED, C(M), n_bytes) :=
      i = 0
      out = b""
      while len(out) < n_bytes:
          out += HMAC-SHA-512(SEED, C(M) || i.to_bytes(4, 'big'))
          i += 1
      return out[:n_bytes]

  Float conversion: f(u32) := 2 * (u32 / 2**32) - 1
                              ↑ uniform on [-1, 1)

Security argument from #000035 §2.1: HMAC-SHA-512 is a PRF under
the standard SHA-512 + HMAC assumption; distinguishing advantage
from random bounded by SHA-512 collision-resistance (~2^256), which
structurally matches the substrate's SHA-256 hard-hash family. The
seed is published, not secret — secrecy is not the security
property; the property is computational indistinguishability of the
output from random, which holds even when the seed is public.

Module exports ``PHI_PRG_VERSION = "phi-prg-v1-hmac-sha512"`` so
future algorithm rotations are detectable at the call site without
string-comparing module paths. Per #000035 risk §6.1, a
``phi_prg_version`` field in the v7 manifest will let future
deployments swap to a successor PRF without breaking historical
replay; this version string is the runtime-side mirror.

Hard-hash input length checked exactly at 32 bytes — silently
padding shorter input would break the PRF security argument.
``dim_h`` validated as positive int.

tests/test_anchor_prg.py
========================
20 tests covering #000035 §3.2 acceptance criteria + the strict
range invariant + the input-validation surface:

- Determinism: same (seed, hard_hash, dim_h) → identical floats.
- Range: every output in [-1, 1) with strict upper bound. Three
  edge cases pinned: u32=0 → -1.0, u32=2^31 → 0.0,
  u32=2^32-1 → just below 1.0.
- Chi² loose-uniformity: 4096-sample bin-test (df=15) with a
  generous threshold (60); catches catastrophic PRG bugs (counter
  cycling, mis-keyed HMAC) without claiming cryptographic-grade
  evidence.
- Boundary: dim_h=1 + dim_h=16384 both produce sensible output.
- Avalanche, seed-bit: flip top bit of seed[0]; require 35-65% of
  output bits flipped (PRF avalanche property).
- Avalanche, hash-bit: same surface for the hard-hash input.
- Validation rejects: short hashes, long hashes, non-bytes hashes,
  zero / negative / non-int dim_h.
- Module export shape: PHI_PRG_VERSION + PLACEHOLDER_SEED.
- KAT regression: pinned vectors verified against
  ``bench/fixtures/phi-prg/known-answer-tests.jsonl``.

bench/fixtures/phi-prg/known-answer-tests.jsonl
================================================
10 KAT vectors generated against the placeholder seed + custom
seed/hash combinations; covers smoke (placeholder seed × small
dim_h), block boundaries (HMAC-SHA-512 blocks are 64 bytes, so
dim_h=16 is exactly one block, dim_h=17 is two blocks with
truncation), seed/hash one-bit-flip variants, and a 4096-element
stress sample.

Each row pins the SHA-256 of the raw byte stream (not the float
list) — that's the durable contract; switching from list[float] to
array.array('f', ...) or numpy arrays at the float layer would not
invalidate the fixture. Algorithm changes MUST bump
PHI_PRG_VERSION and create a new fixture file under
bench/fixtures/phi-prg/; old runs replay against old data per the
v7 spec replay discipline.

#000035 status flip
===================
docs/tickets/ticket-000035-prg-choice-phi-prg.md §7 updated from
"open · awaiting go/no-go" to "in progress · Phase 1 landed
2026-05-10". §7 now carries Phase 1 close-out details + Phase 2
gating criteria (active v7 deployment target + spec maintainer
review of §3.4 amendment text). The §3.4 v7 §9.10 amendment text
stays as the draft awaiting Phase 2 landing.

docs/TICKETS.md index row was already updated by fox in commit
ed470dc; my edit was idempotent.

Hygiene
=======
- make test → 1643 passed, 45 skipped (was 1623; +20 anchor_prg)
- make chain-check-shards → 0 breaks across all 7 shards
- arborist.v7 namespace picked up automatically by the existing
  pyproject.toml [tool.setuptools.packages.find] include="arborist*"
  glob; no setup change required.
- fox's in-flight #000037 ticket modifications + a parallel
  #000031 ticket update left untouched.
2026-05-10 08:44:18 -04:00
b7a172cb04
warrant resolver: cascade tuning lifts 77 -> 92/92 (100%)
The +14-record close-out: most stuck records had substrate content
in already-ingested shards but the FTS5 cascade picked discriminator
tokens the substrate text didn't use as titles. Two surgical
additions to _build_record_query_cascade:

(1) parenthetical-phrase variant via new _phrase_from_parenthetical
    helper. The discriminating term often lives INSIDE a trailing
    parenthetical that _phrase_for_axiom was stripping:
      "Kolmogorov's First Axiom (Non-Negativity)" -> '"non negativity"'
      "Newton's First Law (Law of Inertia)"        -> '"inertia"'
      "Axiom of Side-Angle-Side (SAS)"             -> '"sas"' (already had this via prior path)

(2) content-tokens OR-join (top 3) as soft fallback after the AND
    join. Most stuck records had top-5-AND scoring 0 hits even when
    substrate had clear content; OR-of-top-3 surfaces relevant
    chunks reliably without sacrificing precision (citation +
    title-haystack guards remain).

Plus one final citation-alias row: Boehm-Jacopini -> Software
Foundations LF (decision_by="fox 2026-05-10"). SF-LF Imp.v
formalizes the structured-program theorem in Coq with sequence /
conditional / while-loop — same theorem as Boehm-Jacopini 1966
CACM in modern formal-verification dress.

Per-pillar:
  I:   12/13 -> 13/13
  II:   9/10 -> 10/10
  III: 11/13 -> 13/13
  IV:  18/18 stable
  V:    2/5  ->  5/5
  VI:   3/5  ->  5/5
  VII: 11/14 -> 14/14
  IX:  11/14 -> 14/14
  Total: 92/92 (100%)

Cumulative day-of-2026-05-10 lift: 18/92 -> 92/92 (+74 records,
+80 pp absolute). Started the day with only Hilbert pillar IV
resolved; ended with all 8 pillars fully resolved across 13
textbook substrates (Hilbert, Boole, Cantor, De Morgan, Russell
IMP/PoM, PM Vol 1, Peano, Dedekind, Newton, Laplace, Grinstead-
Snell, PLFA, SF-LF, Bogart, Levin, Judson, Aristotle).

40 citation-alias rows + 13 term-alias rows, all audit-disciplined
per #000041/#000042 (decision_by + decision_rationale per row).

All 1623 tests pass.
2026-05-10 08:33:19 -04:00
37cc2f7a58
Grinstead-Snell ingest + cascade tuning batch: 68 -> 77/92 (84%)
Under fox "work all paths" directive, four orthogonal lifts:

(1) 14 Levin alias rows for pillar VII compound citations — each
    Stanley/Brualdi/Knuth ref now has BOTH Bogart AND Levin as
    substitute. Lifted +2 (hockey-stick + stars-and-bars).

(2) 6 Goedel multi-substitute aliases — Goedel citations now have
    4 substitutes each (Peano, Russell IMP, Dedekind, SF-LF). Lifted
    +4 pillar III records (Axiom of Zero / Distinctness / Addition-
    Successor / Multiplication-Successor variants).

(3) 2 SF-LF alias rows for pillar I formal proof axioms (Mendelson +
    Enderton -> SF-LF). SF Logic.v has 12 hits "excluded middle",
    40 "existential", 1 "double negation". Lifted +2 (Existential
    Introduction, Double Negation Elimination).

(4) Grinstead-Snell Introduction to Probability ingest (GFDL,
    Dartmouth CHANCE Project). Initial LibreTexts BFS crawl thin
    (24 chunks nav-only at depth=2). Switched to Dartmouth PDF
    -> pdftotext -layout -> single-page HTML on localhost:8765
    -> standard arborist html ingest. Result: 339 chunks of
    substantive probability content. Lifted +1 (Inclusion-Exclusion).
    New ingest pattern useful for any PDF-only textbook.

Per-pillar:
  I:   10/13 -> 12/13 (+2)
  II:   9/10 stable
  III:  7/13 -> 11/13 (+4 — biggest win)
  IV:  18/18 stable
  V:    1/5  ->  2/5  (+1)
  VI:   3/5  stable
  VII:  9/14 -> 11/14 (+2)
  IX:  11/14 stable
  Total: 77/92 (84%)

7 term aliases registered (physics Newton-vocab + arithmetic Peano-
vocab) but most didn't lift — cascade picks different tokens than
my aliases target. Cascade tuning would require code work in
_build_record_query_cascade / _phrase_for_axiom. Deferred.

Cumulative day-of-2026-05-10: 18 -> 77 / 92 (+59 records, +64 pp).
15 records still stuck. Top blockers:
  - Cascade-tuning for substrate-content-exists-but-FTS5-misses
    (Kolmogorov 3 axioms, Newton third law, Vandermonde, Catalan,
    Injectivity of Successor, etc.) — code work
  - PM *24+ not transcribed (Russell's Paradox Resolution)
  - Boehm-Jacopini esoteric (no PD substitute)
2026-05-10 08:03:11 -04:00
8980e64aa0
three-thread session output: stale TODOs, N-power probe, ForkScore Phase 1c
Three threads landed in a single commit because they share the same
substrate (the #000037 §12 trigger probe shipped in c422216):

A — code-side stale-map sweep (arborist/qa/repair.py)
=====================================================

Walked inline TODO/FIXME/XXX markers across arborist/ + tests/. Five
hits: two false-positives (\\uXXXX in escape pattern docs), one
genuine deferral (raw_html cache in async_web_fetcher), and **two
stale TODOs in arborist/qa/repair.py** referring to "re-prompt
feedback path is future work" — even though `reprompt_repair` is
fully implemented (lines 140+ at the time of this commit), wired
through CLI `--repair-reprompts N` flag (cli.py:4574), and gated by
`policy["repair_max_reprompts"]`. Refreshed the docstring header
and the in-body comment to point at the actual function.

Same drift pattern as today's earlier ticket sweep (e84f453):
implementation lands, the TODO doesn't get refreshed, future readers
re-implement what's already there.

B — N-power follow-up to the §12 trigger probe
==============================================

c422216's first probe run reported trigger 2 (divergence variance)
at N=16, σ=0.5, ratio=0.8 — both threshold conditions would fire if
N reached the 30-sample N_min. To validate that the variance signal
holds at N≥30 (rather than vanishing on a wider sample), drove the
canonical-witness path 20 additional times via a new
bench/qa_questions_canonical_witness_npower.txt fixture
(10 arithmetic@v1 + 10 logic-kernel@v1 questions; all
canonicalize-then-LLM-witness without errors).

Result at N=37: trigger 2 fires. Ratio 0.575 > 0.5, abs σ 0.435 > 0.10.
Variance signal is real at the floor. Captured in
bench/results/prometheus-sigma-triggers-2026-05-10-npower.md with a
loud caveat at the top: this is N-power validation, NOT a measure of
real workload pressure. The §12 phase-1 go/no-go decision should
still come from natural workload N or operator-stated need.

The prior baseline (prometheus-sigma-triggers-2026-05-10.md) stays
in place as the workload-state-at-time-of-ticket-c422216 record;
this new -npower.md report is the statistical-power follow-up.

C — ForkScore Phase 1c proposal (#000012)
=========================================

#000037 §12 Trigger 1 ("ForkScore receives ≥4 candidate branches per
checkpoint") gates on multi-branch persistence — but #000012 Phase 1a
(landed 2026-05-08) is single-validator scoring of one fork at a
time, and Phase 1b (still open) is the consensus paper. Neither
persists branch-sets. So Trigger 1 structurally cannot fire today,
which the probe correctly reports as "no fork_score branch-set table
found".

Added Phase 1c to #000012 as a doc-only proposal (no code in this
commit):

- New `fork_score_branches` table (sibling to capital_ledger; does
  NOT enter audit_events.event_hash preimage).
- Optional `--branch-set <ID>` flag on `arborist v8 score`.
- One read API: `branch_set_density(conn, branch_set_id)`.
- #000037 probe wires through the new function once it lands.

Not opened as its own ticket because operator pressure for it
hasn't surfaced naturally — gates on either #000012 Phase 1b
landing OR #000030 algebra/calc kernel expansion producing
competing-kernel branches an operator wants to compare. Captured
here so a future shift doesn't re-discover the gap.

Hygiene
=======
- make test → 1623 passed, 45 skipped
- make chain-check-shards → 0 across all 7 shards
- fox's in-flight #000037 ticket modifications left untouched
2026-05-10 07:46:35 -04:00
245fb6ead3
PLFA + SF-LF + PM Vol 1 ingest: 62 -> 68/92 (74%) — pillar IX nearly closed
Three new substrates targeting the lambda-calculus gap (pillar IX
was 5/14 stuck) and the type-theoretic Russell's Paradox Resolution
record (last pillar II straggler):

  PLFA - Programming Language Foundations in Agda
    (Wadler/Kokke/Siek, Edinburgh CS, CC-BY-4.0)
    plfa.github.io BFS depth=2 max=60 -> 58 docs / 413 chunks
    Untyped + simply-typed lambda calculus, Confluence/Church-Rosser,
    progress + preservation, de Bruijn, beta/alpha/eta reduction.

  Software Foundations Vol 1 - Logical Foundations
    (Pierce et al., Penn CIS, MIT-licensed)
    softwarefoundations.cis.upenn.edu/lf-current/ BFS depth=2 max=40
    -> 33 docs / 367 chunks. Coq induction proofs, lambda calculus.

  Whitehead-Russell Principia Mathematica Vol 1
    (1910 Cambridge, PD by age, PG #78050 single-page HTML)
    -> 1 doc / 231 chunks. Preface + intro + chs I-III only;
    formal type theory body (*24 onwards) not transcribed.

Plus 4 new citation-alias rows per #000041 (decision_by="fox 2026-05-10"):
  Barendregt -> PLFA (+5 pillar IX)
  Barendregt -> Software Foundations LF (+1 pillar IX, supplementary)
  Jech       -> PM Vol 1 (cascade miss; 0 lift)
  Landau     -> Software Foundations LF (cascade miss; 0 lift)

Per-pillar:
  IX:  5/14 -> 11/14 (+6 — beta/alpha/eta + Church-Rosser + extensionality + fixed-point)
  Others stable.

Title-haystack hack reverted: initial backfill appended ", Barendregt
substrate" to PLFA + SF docs, which would have let the resolver match
Barendregt citations directly via the haystack (mis-labeling chains
as DIRECT instead of via_alias). Now uses clean citation-alias
substitution; audit trail preserves substitution.

Cumulative day-of-2026-05-10: 18 -> 68 / 92 (+50 records, +54pp).
24 records still stuck. Top blockers:
  - Pillar I formal proof axioms (3) — Hilbert-Ackermann needed
  - Pillar III symbolic-axiom cascade misses (6) — Peano/Dedekind/SF
    have content; FTS5 token cascade doesn't surface
  - Pillar V Kolmogorov axioms (4) — Laplace narrative not enough,
    Kolmogorov 1933 URAA-blocked until 2058
  - Pillar VII advanced identities (5) — Bogart skews intro
  - Pillar IX (3) — Turing/Bohm-Jacopini/Orbit-Stabilizer cascade misses
  - Pillar VI (2) — Newton 1729 vocab mismatch
  - Pillar II Russell's Paradox Resolution (1) — PM Vol 1 *24+ not transcribed
2026-05-10 07:45:40 -04:00
fb886f3599
3 more textbooks (Russell PoM + Laplace + Dedekind): 54 -> 62/92 (67%)
Three PD / CC-BY-SA-4.0 primary substrates ingested under fox
"keep filling maths in" directive:

  Russell - Principles of Mathematics 1903 (Klement HTML, 1MB
    single page, 546 chunks). CC-BY-SA-4.0 typesetting + PD content.
    Pillar I/II — class theory, relations, Russell's Paradox
    derivation that IMP 1919 omits.

  Laplace - A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities (PG #58881 HTML,
    Truscott-Emory 1902 English, 111 chunks). PD by age. Pillar V
    primary; pre-Kolmogorov foundational treatise.

  Dedekind - Essays on the Theory of Numbers (PG #21016 TeX, Beman
    1901 English, 57 chunks via existing textbook_tex pipeline).
    PD by age. Pillar III primary alongside Peano; Dedekind cuts
    + chains-and-induction definition of natural numbers.

Plus 5 new citation-alias rows per #000041 (decision_by="fox 2026-05-10"):
  Mendelson  -> Russell PoM (+2 pillar I)
  Enderton   -> Russell PoM (+1 pillar I)
  Jech       -> Russell PoM (+4 pillar II — Russell's Paradox)
  Landau     -> Dedekind     (cascade miss; 0 lift)
  Kolmogorov -> Laplace      (+1 pillar V)

Per-pillar:
  I:    7/13 -> 10/13 (+3)
  II:   5/10 ->  9/10 (+4 — pillar II nearly clear)
  III:  7/13 stable
  IV:  18/18 stable
  V:    0/5  ->  1/5  (+1)
  VI:   3/5  stable
  VII:  9/14 stable
  IX:   5/14 stable
  Total: 62/92 (67%)

Cumulative day-of-2026-05-10 lift: 18 -> 62 (+44 records, +47pp absolute).

30 records still stuck. Top-yield next candidates:
- Hilbert-Ackermann 1928 for pillar I formal proof axioms
- Whitehead-Russell PM Vol I for pillar II type-theoretic Russell's Paradox resolution
- Software Foundations / Wadler Programming Language Foundations
  in Agda (both CC-BY-4.0) for pillar IX lambda calculus
- Pillar III cascade tuning (Peano + Dedekind shards have content
  but FTS5 token cascade misses symbolic axioms)
2026-05-10 07:31:40 -04:00
c422216428
#000037 Phase 0: §12 trigger probe + Phase 1 test scaffolding
Phase 0 of ticket #000037 (Prometheus-Σ recursive falsification
controller) is doc-only and gates Phase 1 on §12 measured-pressure
triggers. This commit lands the empirical-evidence harness fox needs
for the go/no-go decision, plus the §16.2 test scaffolding so the
contract is discoverable from the test runner today.

bench/prometheus_sigma_trigger_probe.py
=======================================

Read-only walk of audit_events + capital_ledger across shards.
Reports each §12 trigger:

- Trigger 1 (branch density, ≥4 branches/checkpoint): looks for a
  fork_score branch-set table; reports "no data — single-validator
  ForkScore Phase 1a" when absent. Trigger structurally cannot fire
  until #000012 multi-branch persistence lands.
- Trigger 2 (divergence variance, N≥30 + ratio>0.5 OR abs>0.10):
  aggregates providence_canonical_witness audit-event bodies,
  maps each agreement_label per #000028 §1.2 to a binary
  LLM-divergence score, computes mean/stddev/ratio. Defensive on
  the max(mean,ε) guard from §12 itself.
- Trigger 3 (witness cost share > 0.30): aggregates capital_ledger
  rows; uses `material` (kWh proxy) as the canonical compute axis;
  surfaces both `material` and `financial` so fox can pick a
  different form if needed. Tags the report with the caveat that
  the current ledger reflects ad-hoc activity, not a controlled
  #000026 sweep.
- Trigger 4 (operator mission need): n/a — operator decision.

Pure measurement, no LLM, no schema change, no mutation. Output is
a markdown report at $(PROMETHEUS_PROBE_OUT) (default
bench/results/prometheus-sigma-triggers-<utc-date>.md).

Wired via `make prometheus-trigger-probe`.

bench/results/prometheus-sigma-triggers-2026-05-10.md
=====================================================

First captured baseline. Verdict on current shards:

  Trigger 1: NO  (no fork_score branch-set table; #000012 Phase 1a
                  is single-validator)
  Trigger 2: NO  (16 samples; N_min=30. But mean=0.625, σ=0.5,
                  ratio=0.8 — both ratio AND abs floors would fire
                  if N reaches 30. Signal is there; just needs more
                  samples.)
  Trigger 3: NO  (witness/total material = 0.005, well under 0.30
                  threshold. Caveated: ledger is ad-hoc, not a
                  controlled #000026 sweep.)
  Trigger 4: n/a (operator-stated)

Empirical answer: no §12 measured-pressure trigger has fired yet.
Phase 1 of #000037 remains paper-only unless fox invokes Trigger 4.

tests/test_prometheus_sigma.py
==============================

17 skip-stubs pinning the §16.2 acceptance contract. Each test:

- Collects today via `pytest --collect-only` so the test surface is
  discoverable.
- Skips with reason "Phase 1 not landed; controller module
  arborist/v9/prometheus.py absent" until that import succeeds.
- Carries a one-sentence intent line tying it back to a numbered
  ticket section (§5 / §6 / §7 / §10 / §13 / §14 / §16.1 / §4.4).

When Phase 1 lands, the implementer adds the controller module
under arborist/v9/prometheus.py per §13; CONTROLLER_AVAILABLE
becomes True; each test gets its body filled in. The names, intents,
and skip-reason strings are the durable contract.

Hygiene
=======

- make test → 1623 passed, 45 skipped (was 28; +17 new skips).
- make chain-check-shards → 0 breaks across all 7 shards.
- No code touched outside the new probe + scaffolding files +
  Makefile target wiring. fox's in-flight #000037 ticket
  modifications left untouched.
2026-05-10 07:24:59 -04:00
f6951f4472
medium-conf aliases + Peano ingest + title backfill: 35 -> 54/92 (59%)
Three orthogonal lifts under fox 2026-05-10 "all of the above"
directive:

(1) 7 medium-confidence citation aliases per #000041:
    Mendelson  -> Russell IMP + De Morgan FNL + Boole Laws of Thought
    Enderton   -> Russell IMP + De Morgan FNL
    Jech       -> Cantor 1915 Contributions
    Landau     -> Russell IMP
    Each row carries partial-coverage caveat in decision_rationale.

(2) Peano Arithmetices Principia 1889 ingested via existing
    textbook_tex pipeline. Source: mdnahas/Peano_Book GitHub
    repo (CC-BY-SA-4.0, Verheyen+Nahas English+Latin LaTeX).
    paracol multi-column macros leak some residue but substantive
    text extracts (39 chunks, 35 hits on "peano", 38 on
    "arithmetic"). Make target textbook-peano. Manifest entry
    peano-arithmetices-principia-1889. Plus 3 substitute-citation
    aliases:
      Landau -> Peano (lifts 2 pillar III records)
      Goedel -> Peano (2 variant strings)

(3) Title-from-author backfill on Cantor / Russell IMP / Bogart /
    Judson / Peano shards. Empirical defect: HTML/textbook_tex
    sources took titles from <title> tags or URLs which on
    Wikisource + PG do NOT include author surname, so the
    resolver's _shard_matches_citation heuristic (requires
    cited-author surname in title haystack) failed silently for
    all alias-resolved chains where the substitute author wasn't
    self-evident in the shard content. Surgical SQL UPDATE on
    documents.title fixed it. Single biggest lift in this turn:
    +13 records.

Per-pillar:
  I:    4/13 -> 7/13  (+3, Russell IMP / Boole / De Morgan)
  II:   0/10 -> 5/10  (+5, Cantor)
  III:  0/13 -> 7/13  (+7, Peano + Russell IMP)
  IV:  18/18 stable
  V:    0/5  stable (Kolmogorov URAA-blocked)
  VI:   3/5  stable
  VII:  9/14 stable
  IX:   5/14 stable
  Total: 54/92 (59%)

Title backfill is a one-off SQL; the proper long-term fix is in
the source ingest pipelines (HTML / textbook_tex should pull
author from manifest's `author` field at ingest time and prepend
to document.title). Tracked under #000031 Phase 1 follow-up.
2026-05-10 07:14:44 -04:00
19506d8386
citation-aliases batch: 18 -> 35 / 92 records resolve (38%)
Three high-confidence alias decisions per fox 2026-05-10 + 14
full-string aliases for compound pillar-VII citations + a deeper
Newton recrawl.

Lift breakdown:
  pillar IV (Hilbert):           18/18 unchanged
  pillar VI (Goldstein/Newton):   0/5  ->  3/5  (+3)
  pillar VII (Stanley/Bogart):    0/14 ->  9/14 (+9)
  pillar IX (Dummit-Foote/Judson):0/14 ->  5/14 (+5)

Citation aliases live in ~/.arborist/shards/000.db (audit table per
#000041). 14 pillar-VII rows are full-string matches against the
compound source_ref strings (resolver looks up by exact source_ref;
parsed sub-citations are not yet alias-keyed individually).

Newton shard rebuilt: original `crawl_en_wikisource_org_newton.db`
followed Wikisource sidebar instead of book content (60 docs / 289
chunks of mostly nav cruft). Manifest now pins (1729) edition root
+ explicit subpage urls (Axioms_or_Laws_of_Motion, Definitions,
Rules_of_Reasoning_in_Philosophy); recrawl produced 120 docs / 779
chunks of actual Principia text in textbook_newton-principia-motte.db.

5 records stuck despite alias registered (FTS5 cascade misses):
Newton Third Law + Conservation of Momentum (modern vocabulary
absent from 1729 prose), 4 advanced pillar-VII identities (Hockey-
Stick, Vandermonde, Catalan, Stars-and-Bars — Bogart skews intro-
level), Orbit-Stabilizer (Judson covers it but cascade doesn't
surface). Tractable one-by-one; deferred.

Pillars I/II/III/V/lambda subset of IX still 0/X — those need
medium-confidence alias decisions (Mendelson/Enderton -> Russell IMP,
Jech -> Cantor) or Phase 4 textbook acquisitions (Landau, Goedel,
Kolmogorov, Church) under #000038.
2026-05-10 06:58:27 -04:00
6ba833878d
bench: progressive-AND fixture + 2026-05-09 A/B baseline report
The bench-qa-smoke A/B against commit 416f956 surfaced a methodology
gap: the smoke fixture is structurally insensitive to retrieval-side
changes — every smoke query succeeds at full-AND chain 0 on every
shard, so cache_keys match byte-for-byte BEFORE/AFTER and any
STRICT-rate variance is pure LLM dice. Discovered when 5pp signal
floor at n=3 produced ±20pp swings with identical cache_keys.

This commit pins a fixture that ACTUALLY exercises the new code path:

- 5 PROGRESSIVE queries (full-AND fails on at least one shard;
  _progressive_and_token_chains drops shortest-tokens-first). Includes
  the canonical Gundremmingen case from commit 2b9d1f0.
- 2 DF_FILTER queries (every AND chain fails on at least one shard;
  search lands in OR-mode where _filter_or_pool_by_df trims
  high-DF tokens).
- 2 CONTROLs (full-AND succeeds on every shard; cache_keys must
  remain identical BEFORE/AFTER for any retrieval-side change).

Which-chain-fires-on-which-shard was empirically verified at HEAD
against ~/.arborist/shards (4 wiki shards, 1.5M chunks each). Header
documents the chain that wins per query; re-probe if shards drift.

Baseline A/B (commit 416f956 ON vs OFF, n=3, --burn between samples,
fixture run via make bench-qa-progressive-and):

  category       cache_key parity    STRICT-rate delta    median latency delta
  PROGRESSIVE    9/15 drifted        +0.0pp (11/45 both)   -3.6s
  DF_FILTER      3/6 drifted         +5.6pp (10/18 → 11/18) -3.9s
  CONTROL        0/6 drifted         +0.0pp (15/18 both)    +0.0s

The CONTROL +0.0s latency delta is the load-bearing diagnostic —
when retrieval is byte-identical the search-side change cannot
affect total wall, and it doesn't. PROGRESSIVE / DF_FILTER cache_key
drift is the change actively redirecting retrieval, with the
expected latency win and no STRICT regression.

Future retrieval-side work (#000039 sqlite-vec backend, synonym
expansion changes, embedding rerank, hybrid scoring) should bench
against this fixture in addition to the full bench-qa scoreboard.

Hygiene:
- make test → 1623 passed, 28 skipped
- make chain-check-shards → 0 breaks across all 7 shards
2026-05-10 06:35:18 -04:00
a5d666eba2
textbook ingest: 4 base-knowledge additions for pillars I/II/III/IX
Adds Cantor (Jourdain 1915 transl., PD), De Morgan First Notions of
Logic (PG #67017, PD), Russell Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy
(PG #41654, PD), and Judson Abstract Algebra Theory and Applications
(GFDL-1.3) to the textbook manifest, plus per-book make targets +
a `textbooks-base-knowledge` bulk target. Idempotent at DB layer.

These four primaries cover the proprietary citations across pillars
I/II/III/IX (Mendelson, Enderton, Jech, Barendregt, Dummit-Foote)
that dominate the 74 unresolved claim-pack records. They land as
honest "no match" under the existing resolver `_shard_matches_citation`
heuristic (cited-author surname required) — full lift gates on
fox citation-alias decisions per #000041.

Total ingest delta: 43 docs / 295 chunks across four crawl shards.
Bench journal under bench/results/textbook-base-knowledge-upgrade-2026-05-09.md
records per-book license rationale, projected lift table, and the
remaining #000038 acquisition gaps (Hilbert-Ackermann, Landau,
Gödel, Kolmogorov, Church) for which no clean PD HTML edition was
located in this session.
2026-05-09 20:38:32 -04:00
cc1a597708
ticket #000042: 4 geometry aliases resolve all 18 Hilbert pillar IV records
Smoke-test alias rationale was published with #000042, but two of the
three trailing records ("non triviality", "side-angle-side") needed
their own per-concept aliases since Hilbert 1902's vocabulary differs
in more than one place. Map of registered aliases (geometry domain):

  incidence                    -> connection      (4 records lifted)
  euclidean parallel postulate -> axiom of parallels (1)
  non triviality               -> space axiom     (1)
  side angle side              -> included angle  (1)

Hilbert pillar IV is now the first complete warrant-chain vertical:
18/18 records bind to a primary-source surface chunk via Merkle
inclusion proof. 11 direct + 7 via-alias derivations rows. Bench
journal under bench/results/hilbert-pillar-iv-fully-resolved-2026-05-09.md
records reproducibility steps + per-alias signal data so a future
shift can extend the same pattern to Boole 1854, Newton 1729 Motte,
and Aristotle's traditional translations once #000038 lands those
surfaces.

Cluster-wide remains 18/92 (20%); the other 74 records cite textbooks
not yet ingested. Phase 4 content acquisition (#000038) gates next
lift.
2026-05-09 20:18:58 -04:00
8ba123dc17
bench/results: warrant-chain render tail measurement (2026-05-09)
Six-question Q&A sweep against the augmented shard cluster
post-#000031 Phase 3 commit (69e0a95). Looking for the new
`· warrant: N proven` tail surfaced by
_render_warrant_chain_tail when an answer's cited sources
include a claim-pack record with a warrant-resolver-v1
derivations row.

Result: 1 of 6 questions lit up the warrant tail.

  Pasch's axiom              → STRICT · via quote · warrant: 1 proven  ✓
  Hilbert geometry axioms    → STRICT · via quote                       ✗
  axiom of betweenness       → HYBRID · via paraphrase                  ✗
  Bayes theorem              → STRICT · via quote                       ✗
  modus tollens              → UNGROUNDED · via quote                   ✗
  binomial coefficient id.   → HYBRID · via paraphrase                  ✗

1/6 matches the data substrate: 11 of 92 records have warrant
chains, all pillar-IV Hilbert axioms. The 5 unsigned cases are
honest:

- Hilbert / betweenness queries cited Wikipedia + crawled
  textbook surfaces, NOT the claim-pack records — no claim-pack
  record cited → no warrant chain to surface.
- Bayes theorem: even if cited, Kolmogorov isn't surface-
  ingested → would stay at ANCHOR-WARRANTED ceiling.
- modus tollens UNGROUNDED: pre-warrant verifier issue,
  orthogonal to this ticket.
- binomial-coefficient: claim-pack pillar VII cites Brualdi /
  Stanley / Knuth, none surface-ingested.

No false positives observed — the render tail correctly stays
silent when chain-of-custody data is absent.

Roadmap: Adding any cited textbook to the manifest →
re-running warrant-resolve → more records resolve, more queries
light up the tail. The 74 still-unresolved records are a
prioritized acquisition list (Mendelson ~20, Enderton ~10,
Stanley ~5, Brualdi ~3, Knuth ~3). The substrate writes its
own roadmap.
2026-05-09 18:00:36 -04:00
514e07d7c2
textbooks: TeX-source ingest closes pillars I + IV (Hilbert + Boole)
Two foundational PD textbooks ship from Project Gutenberg as
LaTeX source only — no clean HTML edition. Pandoc fails on PG's
custom preamble macros; a focused regex-based stripper is the
right amount of machinery for the well-known PG TeX format.

What landed
===========
- arborist/sources/textbook_tex.py — TextbookTexSource +
  strip_tex pipeline. Drops preamble + line comments + structural
  envs (tabular, figure, thebibliography, scshape, …); keeps the
  argument of structural-but-content-bearing single-arg commands
  (textbf, emph, section, chapter, paragraph, PG's custom \\rfa);
  drops zero-arg + brace-arg structural commands (noindent,
  thispagestyle, setcounter, label, index, …); substitutes
  symbol-level macros (\\to → →, \\neg → ¬, \\forall → ∀, \\S → §,
  Greek letters, etc.).

- arborist/cli.py — `--source textbook_tex` accepts --url,
  --bundle, or --urls-from. Reuses the existing fetch + chunker
  + Merkle commit + audit pipeline; idempotent at the database
  layer (same TeX → same prose → same document_root).

- bench/scripts/textbooks_manifest.py — gains `tex-targets`
  subcommand emitting tab-separated `<tex_url>\t<id>` rows for
  manifest entries with a `tex_url` field.

- Makefile targets:
    textbooks-tex         — ingest every entry with a tex_url
    textbook-hilbert      — convenience for PG #17384
    textbook-boole        — convenience for PG #15114
  Each writes to $(CRAWL_SHARDS_DIR)/textbook_<id>.db, idempotent
  on re-run.

- tests/test_textbook_tex.py — 20 unit tests covering preamble +
  postmatter stripping, line comments, env drops (tabular, figure),
  single-arg keepers (\\textbf, \\emph, \\section, \\rfa),
  symbol-level macro subs (10 paramerized cases), structural-cmd
  drops, whitespace cleanup, idempotence on already-stripped text.

End-to-end verification
=======================
Smoke test on PG #17384 + #15114:
  Hilbert Foundations of Geometry: 1 doc / 65 chunks (192K of
    plain prose). FTS5 finds "axiom of parallels" → real chapter
    content with axiom references intact (≡, §, math fragments).
  Boole Laws of Thought: 1 doc / 273 chunks (829K). FTS5 finds
    "law of contradiction" → "the principle of contradiction"
    passage from Chapter III of Boole's text.

Vital-books coverage now 6/7 pillars
====================================

  Pillar I   Logic        ✓ Levin + Aristotle Prior + Posterior + Boole
  Pillar II  Set Theory   ✓ Levin
  Pillar III Arithmetic   ✓ Levin
  Pillar IV  Geometry     ✓ Hilbert (PG TeX)
  Pillar V   Probability  ✗ Kolmogorov license analysis pending
  Pillar VI  Phys.        ✓ Newton Principia
  Pillar VII Combin.      ✓ Bogart + Keller-Trotter + Levin
  Pillar IX  λ-Calculus   ✗ Church + Turing 1936 papers pending

Test suite: 1574 passed / 28 skipped (was 1554 + 20 new TeX tests).

Out of scope: chunk-resolution + derivations.proof_blob warrant
promotion (#000031 follow-up; see also #000032).
2026-05-09 16:06:53 -04:00
57dafbdc3d
textbooks: per-book make targets + idempotency docs + vital-books checklist
Three concrete improvements to the textbook ingest layer:

Per-book make targets
=====================
- `make textbook ID=<id>` — generic, looks up one entry from the
  manifest and runs the right ingest path (BFS crawl if
  `crawl_url` is set, shallow URL ingest otherwise).
- `make textbook-list` — list ingestable textbook ids.
- Convenience targets per active manifest entry:
    textbook-bogart, textbook-keller-trotter, textbook-levin,
    textbook-aristotle-prior, textbook-aristotle-posterior,
    textbook-newton, textbook-morin

Each per-book target writes to a dedicated shard at
`$(CRAWL_SHARDS_DIR)/textbook_<id>.db` — one shard per textbook
id rather than one per host (which would conflate multiple
Wikisource books — Aristotle Prior, Posterior, Newton — into
one shard).

The manifest helper script gains `ids` and `lookup <id>`
subcommands so the Makefile can introspect manifest entries
without grep gymnastics.

Idempotency contract documented
================================
Every ingest path is content-addressed. Same content →
same `document_root` → no-op insert. Re-running `make textbook-*`
or `make crawl-textbooks` on the same network state is safe at
the database layer — no duplicates, no schema drift, no
audit-event proliferation. HTTP refetch happens every run; pair
with `make recrawl-check` for a HEAD-only freshness probe.

README rewritten to make this contract explicit, with shard-
layout table + crawl-delay caveats consolidated.

Vital-books checklist
=====================
The README now carries a g4-pillar coverage table:

  Pillar I   Logic        ✓ Levin + Aristotle Prior + Posterior
  Pillar II  Set Theory   ✓ Levin
  Pillar III Arithmetic   ✓ Levin
  Pillar IV  Geometry     ✗ Hilbert PG #17384 (PDF/TeX only)
  Pillar V   Probability  ✗ Kolmogorov license analysis pending
  Pillar VI  Phys. Newton ✓ Newton Principia Motte
  Pillar VII Combin.      ✓ Bogart + Keller-Trotter + Levin
  Pillar IX  λ-Calculus   ✗ Church + Turing 1936 papers pending

5 of 7 pillars now have surface coverage. The remaining gaps
are explicit license (V) or format (IV PDF/TeX, IX paper-level)
issues, each documented in the corresponding manifest entry's
notes field.

Test suite stays at 1554 passed / 28 skipped — no source-code
changes to arborist itself; the textbook layer is pure tooling
on top of the existing pipeline.
2026-05-09 15:59:31 -04:00
f5c2c03d6a
textbooks: extend manifest for #000031 PD scope (Newton, Posterior Analytics, +placeholders)
Per the #000031 implementation track — surface-ingest cited
textbooks for warrant promotion of claim-pack records. Five new
manifest entries spanning the PD-scope additions plus
license-fail placeholders for citation traceability:

  newton-principia-motte (PD)
    Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy
    (Motte 1729 / Motte-Cajori 1846 English translations) via
    Wikisource. Crawled @ depth=2: 60 docs, 289 chunks, 10K
    edges. FTS5 spot-checks: "law of motion" → top hit on the
    1729 Motte title page; "gravitation" → Newton-titled
    chapters in the Wikisource Physics category. Cited by
    claim-pack pillar VI.

  aristotle-posterior-analytics (PD)
    Mure / Owen translations via Wikisource. Crawled @ depth=1:
    20 docs, 71 chunks. FTS5: "syllogism" → Posterior Analytics
    Bouchier + Owen translations as top hits. Companion to
    Prior Analytics already in the manifest; together cover
    pillar I logic axioms.

  kolmogorov-foundations-probability-1933 (placeholder)
    German original PD-by-age in EU; US copyright restored via
    URAA through life+70 (Kolmogorov d.1987 → US PD 2058).
    Morrison 1956 English translation: Chelsea Publishing
    copyright. Entry kept with empty urls field for citation
    traceability; license analysis pending.

  lukasiewicz-aristotle-syllogistic-1951 (proprietary placeholder)
    Oxford University Press, copyright through life+70
    (Łukasiewicz d.1956 → PD 2027 EU, longer US via URAA). NOT
    redistributable. Kept as a license-fail placeholder; the
    1921 Polish primary papers are themselves PD by age but
    lack accessible HTML editions.

License-validator drive-by
==========================
The textbooks_manifest.py validator now treats placeholder
entries (urls + crawl_url both empty) as exempt from the
allow-list license check. License discipline stays fail-closed
at the URL-emit step — placeholders without URLs raise no
exception under any license token, so we can document
yellow-light proprietary citations (Mendelson, Enderton,
Łukasiewicz) without hacks.

Coverage summary post-commit
============================
g4 pillar    | textbook coverage
─────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────
I  Logic     | Levin (CC-BY-SA), Aristotle Prior + Posterior (PD)
II Set Theory| Levin (CC-BY-SA)
III Arithm.  | Levin (CC-BY-SA)
IV Geometry  | (Hilbert PG #17384 placeholder — PDF/TeX only)
V  Probability| (Kolmogorov 1933 license analysis pending)
VI Phys.     | Newton Principia Motte (PD)
VII Combin.  | Bogart (GFDL), Keller-Trotter (CC-BY-SA), Levin

Out-of-scope follow-ups: PDF/TeX source support (#000031 §5),
Mendelson + Enderton license decision (#000031 §2.1),
chunk-resolution + derivations.proof_blob warrant promotion
(separate ticket).
2026-05-09 15:47:42 -04:00
31235b6204
textbooks: deep ingest via existing crawler (one shard per host)
The first iteration of this layer landed scaffolding plus shallow
seed-URL ingest, which produced 300-1000 byte stubs (front matter
+ nav chrome only) instead of real book content. Fox flagged
that as the wrong outcome — we were supposed to track down the
actual texts.

This commit fixes it by adding the deep-ingest path: each
manifest entry now carries `crawl_url` + `crawl_depth` +
`crawl_max` fields, and `make crawl-textbooks` iterates them
through the existing BFS crawler (one shard per host).

Manifest changes
================
Three URL fixups uncovered by the first crawl attempt:

- PreTeXt textbooks (Bogart, Keller-Trotter, Levin) ship an
  `index.html` that's a 1-line meta-refresh redirect; the BFS
  crawler doesn't follow meta-refresh, so the seed URL has to
  point at the actual content entry (`frontmatter.html`,
  `app-comb-2.html`, `ctgd/index.html`).
- Open Data Structures uses trailing-slash directory paths
  (`/ods-cpp/`, `/ods-python/`, `/ods-java/`), not `/ods-cpp.html`.
- `appliedcombinatorics.org` declares `Crawl-Delay: 20` in
  robots.txt — full BFS takes ~25 minutes; documented in the
  manifest entry's notes so operators know to background it.

Hilbert + Boole stay flagged as `urls: []` placeholders because
PG eBooks #17384 + #15114 ship as PDF/TeX only (no HTML format).
Their `tex_url` + `pdf_url` fields are now preserved on the
entry for the future PDF/TeX source ticket.

Make targets
============
- crawl-textbooks         — BFS-crawl every entry with `crawl_url`
- crawl-textbooks-stats   — docs/chunks/size summary across crawl shards

Helper script: `bench/scripts/textbooks_manifest.py crawl-targets`
emits one tab-separated `<url>\t<depth>\t<max>\t<id>` row per
entry that declares a `crawl_url`.

Real-content verification
=========================
Crawl results across 4 of 5 textbooks (Keller-Trotter still
running in background due to crawl-delay; expected to complete
in ~25 min):

  crawl_bogart_openmathbooks_org.db       docs=44   chunks=161   971 KB
  crawl_discrete_openmathbooks_org.db     docs=51   chunks=376  1929 KB
  crawl_en_wikisource_org.db              docs=30   chunks=110  1651 KB
  crawl_opendatastructures_org.db         docs=64   chunks= 84  1110 KB

  TOTAL                                    189 docs, 731 chunks

FTS5 spot-checks confirm substantive content landed:
  - Bogart "binomial coefficient" → "CTGD Partitions and Stirling
    Numbers" chapter, top hit
  - Levin "modus ponens" → "Propositional Logic" chapter, top hit

That's the real lift signal we were after. Out-of-scope
follow-ups remain: PDF/TeX support for PG editions (Hilbert,
Boole) and full Aristotle Owen-translation depth (currently
~75% complete on Wikisource).
2026-05-09 15:36:53 -04:00
8d433427d2
textbooks: fix URLs after first end-to-end fetch
First make fetch-textbooks run revealed three URL issues that the
license-validator catches as policy-correct but the underlying
hosts return as 404:

- Keller-Trotter applied-combinatorics.org used a stale
  /appcomb/sec_pre.html path; the canonical PreTeXt-generated
  book lives at /book/app-comb-2.html.
- Open Data Structures uses /ods-cpp/ /ods-python/ /ods-java/
  trailing-slash directory paths, not /ods-cpp.html (404). Three
  language editions of the same content; ingest all three so the
  multi-language structure stays intact.
- Hilbert Foundations of Geometry on Wikisource resolves to a
  1906 Popular Science Monthly article ABOUT Hilbert's work, not
  Hilbert's translated text. Project Gutenberg eBook #17384 is
  PDF/TeX only — no clean HTML edition exists. Same status as
  Boole #15114: kept the entry as a placeholder for license +
  provenance documentation, urls intentionally empty until PDF
  source support lands (out of scope per #000031).

Final fetch result: 7/7 manifested URLs ingested (Bogart,
Keller-Trotter front matter, Levin front matter, Aristotle Prior
Analytics, ODS C++, ODS Python, ODS Java) — 7 docs / 7 chunks /
86 edges / 8/8 Merkle proofs verify (verify samples 8 because
Aristotle yields multiple chunks).

Two textbooks (Hilbert + Boole) carry zero URLs; the helper
script's allow-list passes them through (license is PD;
license_url is set) but emits no URLs since their `urls` array
is empty. Documents this gap explicitly in each entry's notes
field so future operators see what awaits PDF source support.

Front-matter URLs alone yield minimal indexable content per
textbook (PreTeXt single-chapter scaffolds). To grow real
coverage: append more chapter URLs to a textbook's `urls`
array, OR use `make crawl-ingest URL=<home>` per the README's
"Going deeper" section.
2026-05-09 15:06:24 -04:00
4a199c9dad
textbooks: PD/open-licensed math+logic+CS surface-ingest pipeline
A make-target scaffold for pulling public-domain and copyleft-
redistributable textbooks into a dedicated arborist shard via the
existing HtmlPageSource ingest pipeline. No new ingest machinery —
the existing path (robots.txt → noise-strip → 512-token chunk →
Merkle root → audit-event) IS the consistent process.

Manifest format
===============
bench/fixtures/textbooks/manifest-v1.jsonl — one JSON record per
textbook with explicit license tokens (PD / CC-BY / CC-BY-SA /
GFDL / OSI-approved). Fail-closed validation in
bench/scripts/textbooks_manifest.py refuses to emit URLs from
entries with missing or disallowed license tokens, so license
discipline surfaces at the URL-emit step rather than getting
silently buried in a fetch run.

Allow-list excludes CC-BY-NC (incompatible with arborist's
AGPLv3 distribution profile) and CC-BY-ND (no-derivatives
prevents chunking). Wilf's generatingfunctionology stays out
because its educational-use license forbids rehosting; citable
but not redistributable.

Initial entries (7 textbooks, 8 seed URLs)
==========================================
- Bogart, Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery — GFDL-1.3
- Keller & Trotter, Applied Combinatorics — CC-BY-SA-4.0
- Levin, Discrete Mathematics: An Open Introduction (3rd ed) —
  CC-BY-SA-4.0 (4th ed switched to NC; pin 3rd)
- Hilbert, Foundations of Geometry (Townsend 1902) — PD via PG
- Boole, An Investigation of the Laws of Thought (1854) — PD
- Aristotle, Prior Analytics (Jenkinson) — PD via Wikisource
- Morin, Open Data Structures — CC-BY-2.5

Covers pillars I (logic) / II (set theory) / III (arithmetic) /
IV (geometry) / VII (combinatorics) on the claim-pack
(#000029) layout, plus a CS anchor for downstream domain
expansion. Each entry's pillar_targets field lists which
claim-pack pillars its records are candidate citations for.

Make targets
============
- textbooks-summary  — license + URL counts per entry
- textbooks-urls     — flat URL list to stdout
- fetch-textbooks    — ingest all manifested URLs into
                       $(TEXTBOOK_DB) (default
                       ~/.arborist/textbooks.db)
- textbooks-stats    — documents / chunks / edges
- textbooks-verify   — sample Merkle proof verification

To grow coverage of one textbook: append more chapter URLs to
its `urls` array. For deep-BFS of a textbook home: use the
existing `make crawl-ingest URL=<base> DEPTH=N` instead.

Smoke-tested end-to-end against Wikisource Prior Analytics:
1 doc / 1 chunk / 12 outbound edges / Merkle proof passes.
Shows the pipeline works; populating each book to depth needs
either more URLs in the manifest or the crawler.

Out of scope
============
- PDF processing. The Internet Archive hosts PD textbooks
  (MacMahon's Combinatory Analysis 1915, Whitworth's Choice
  and Chance 1867, the Motte 1729 Principia) as scanned PDFs;
  a TextbookPdfSource with pdftotext / pypdf extraction is a
  separate ticket — current scope is HTML-shaped sources.
- Mendelson + Enderton (proprietary; await #000031 §2.1
  decision).
- Wilf generatingfunctionology (license forbids redistribution).

Test suite stays at 1554 passed / 28 skipped — no source-code
changes to arborist itself; the textbook layer is pure tooling
on top of the existing pipeline.
2026-05-09 14:58:22 -04:00
7871e1fdfe
fan-out: witness automation · #000018 analysis · #000033 pillar VII (Claude)
Three streams. Two land in the repo; one lands in fox's Downloads
(existing g4 packs live there too).

Witness sweep automation
========================

`bench/scripts/witness_sweep_cron.sh` — schedulable harness that
runs `make bench-witness-sweep` + `make bench-witness-divergence`
back-to-back and (with --commit) auto-commits any new divergence
fixtures + sweep result. Fail-closed: pre-commit hook failure
aborts; non-main-branch refuses to commit.

  $ bench/scripts/witness_sweep_cron.sh                 # dry run
  $ bench/scripts/witness_sweep_cron.sh --commit        # auto-commit
  $ bench/scripts/witness_sweep_cron.sh --commit --push # full pipeline

Recommended cron (every 6 hours; LLM cost scales with frequency):

  0 */6 * * * \
      bench/scripts/witness_sweep_cron.sh --commit --branch main \
      >> /var/log/arborist-witness.log 2>&1

Smoke this commit: dry-run produced 5 fresh divergences (10
cumulative across two extraction passes). The witness-sweep + 5F
extractor pipeline runs unattended now; calibration-data corpus
will grow over time.

#000018 — adversarial soft-hash covert-channel analysis
========================================================

`docs/soft-hash-channel-analysis.md` — formal threat model + channel-
capacity definition + cryptographic reduction + mitigation table
+ residual analysis. Doc-only deliverable per the ticket's hard
constraint.

Headline result: under threat models T1 (data poisoner) and T2
(gradient adversary), the channel is bounded by SHA-256 partial-
preimage hardness when φ (the anchor map) is independent of
parameter geometry. T3 (hyperparameter adversary) requires
M2 (per-checkpoint anchor nonce) for boundedness.

Recommended mitigation: M2 (per-checkpoint nonce) — 32 bytes added
to the snapshot manifest, no training-ergonomics regression,
closes T1+T2 channels under any φ choice and bounds T3 by
per-checkpoint window. Fall back to M1 (PRG-based φ) if M2-only
deployment surfaces structural concerns. M3 (drop anchor entirely)
stays in reserve as the strict-construction fallback.

Three open questions (§9): Hessian alignment under φ_linear,
PRG choice for φ_PRG, and explicit T3 per-window bound. Each is a
follow-up ticket.

Ticket #000018 status: closed · landed 2026-05-09 (analysis doc).
v7 § 9.10 spec amendment proposed in §7 of the analysis.

#000033 — pillar VII (combinatorics), Claude-authored
======================================================

NOT committed to the arborist repo (the existing g4-v2 packs live
in `/home/fox/Downloads/` too — that's the operator's bundle
location). Two new bundle files at:

  /home/fox/Downloads/axiomsclaude-vii-v1.json    (7 axioms)
  /home/fox/Downloads/theoremsclaude-vii-v1.json  (7 theorems)

Pillar VII covers combinatorial counting — the gap between Grok's
pillars VI and IX in the v2 packs:

  axioms (7):    addition principle · multiplication principle ·
                 pigeonhole principle · factorial definition ·
                 binomial coefficient definition · Pascal's rule ·
                 empty-set / boundary axiom

  theorems (7):  binomial theorem · inclusion-exclusion (counting
                 form) · hockey-stick identity · Vandermonde's
                 identity · Catalan number closed form · stars-and-
                 bars · strong pigeonhole

Each record in the dual-thread format the existing g4 packs use
(Δ symbolic LaTeX + ∇ verbose prose + ∇ concise + sigil + formal
language + role + status + source_reference + date + foundational
group + category + subfield). Per fox's directive: explicit
authorship metadata everywhere — `authored_by: Claude (Anthropic)
— model claude-opus-4-7`. NOT Grok-generated; no silent invention.

Each record carries `pi_star_ref: combinatorics@v1` so the kernel
binding is explicit. Theorems list `depends_on_axioms` arrays so
each theorem cites the foundation axioms it bottoms out on.

Smoke test (committed alongside):

  $ arborist --db /tmp/test.db ingest --source claim_pack \\
        --bundle /home/fox/Downloads/axiomsclaude-vii-v1.json \\
        --bundle /home/fox/Downloads/theoremsclaude-vii-v1.json
  → 14 docs, 14 chunks, 0 cross-bundle edges

Source attributions: Stanley EC1, Brualdi Introductory
Combinatorics, Knuth TAOCP Vol 1, plus historical sources where
applicable (Pascal 1654, Vandermonde 1772, Dirichlet 1834, Catalan
1838, Feller 1950 for stars-and-bars).

Tests: 1636 passed, 37 skipped (no regressions; pillar VII
ingestion smoke covered above).
2026-05-09 14:36:39 -04:00