From d17f326f346a869799ec45860c466d1aed5eab10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "russell@unturf.com" Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 05:51:41 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] fix: resolve merge conflict markers in aggregated performance report --- AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md | 71 --------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 71 deletions(-) diff --git a/AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md b/AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md index 727b5ba..a467ab4 100644 --- a/AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md +++ b/AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md @@ -1,22 +1,13 @@ # UN Inception: Aggregated Performance Analysis -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -**Analysis Date:** 1769162516.8008766 -**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8 -======= **Analysis Date:** 1769162752.9821825 **Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9 ->>>>>>> Stashed changes --- ## Executive Summary -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -Analysis of 7 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by: -======= Analysis of 8 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by: ->>>>>>> Stashed changes 1. **Orchestrator placement on CPU-bound pool** (not an SRE best practice) 2. **Resource contention** between the orchestrator & test jobs @@ -38,10 +29,7 @@ Analysis of 8 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution | 4.2.6 | 54s | haskell (128s) | awk (23s) | -13s (-19.4%) | | 4.2.7 | 117s | typescript (319s) | dotnet (5s) | +63s (+116.7%) | | 4.2.8 | 111s | kotlin (313s) | fortran (28s) | -6s (-5.1%) | -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= | 4.2.9 | 107s | ruby (279s) | d (19s) | -4s (-3.6%) | ->>>>>>> Stashed changes **Observation:** Average duration increased **0.0%** from 0s to 0s. @@ -65,10 +53,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs: - 4.2.6: 41s - 4.2.7: 313s - 4.2.8: 127s -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= - 4.2.9: 59s ->>>>>>> Stashed changes - **Range:** 20s → 313s (1465.0% variance) **TYPESCRIPT:** @@ -79,10 +64,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs: - 4.2.6: 53s - 4.2.7: 319s - 4.2.8: 94s -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= - 4.2.9: 118s ->>>>>>> Stashed changes - **Range:** 29s → 319s (1000.0% variance) **R:** @@ -93,10 +75,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs: - 4.2.6: 47s - 4.2.7: 313s - 4.2.8: 126s -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= - 4.2.9: 54s ->>>>>>> Stashed changes - **Range:** 25s → 313s (1152.0% variance) **KOTLIN:** @@ -107,10 +86,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs: - 4.2.6: 69s - 4.2.7: 49s - 4.2.8: 313s -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= - 4.2.9: 89s ->>>>>>> Stashed changes - **Range:** 27s → 313s (1059.3% variance) **RUBY:** @@ -121,10 +97,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs: - 4.2.6: 48s - 4.2.7: 318s - 4.2.8: 93s -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= - 4.2.9: 279s ->>>>>>> Stashed changes - **Range:** 35s → 318s (808.6% variance) @@ -141,10 +114,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs: 4.2.6: awk, powershell, crystal, raku, erlang 4.2.7: dotnet, deno, awk, fortran, commonlisp 4.2.8: fortran, groovy, crystal, java, powershell -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= 4.2.9: d, julia, csharp, v, objc ->>>>>>> Stashed changes **Slowest Languages by Run:** @@ -155,10 +125,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs: 4.2.6: haskell, go, cpp, rust, forth 4.2.7: typescript, ruby, r, elixir, crystal 4.2.8: kotlin, python, javascript, tcl, raku -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= 4.2.9: ruby, deno, rust, crystal, java ->>>>>>> Stashed changes **Conclusion:** No consistent "fast" or "slow" languages across runs. This proves: - Execution order is random or system-dependent @@ -252,22 +219,14 @@ RUBY: 35s → 318s (+808.6%) CRYSTAL: 24s → 260s (+983.3%) -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= DENO: 24s → 253s (+954.2%) ->>>>>>> Stashed changes TCL: 20s → 247s (+1135.0%) PYTHON: 40s → 253s (+532.5%) PHP: 23s → 235s (+921.7%) -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -RAKU: 33s → 240s (+627.3%) - -======= ->>>>>>> Stashed changes These languages are most affected by resource contention. Likely reasons: - **Dynamic languages** (Python, Ruby, JavaScript): Startup time varies with GC/JIT @@ -319,28 +278,6 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment. | Language | Min (s) | Max (s) | Avg (s) | Range (s) | Variance % | |----------|---------|---------|---------|-----------|------------| -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -| DOTNET | 5 | 102 | 53.5 | 97 | 1940.0% | -| ELIXIR | 20 | 313 | 104.3 | 293 | 1465.0% | -| R | 25 | 313 | 100.1 | 288 | 1152.0% | -| TCL | 20 | 247 | 95.0 | 227 | 1135.0% | -| KOTLIN | 27 | 313 | 88.3 | 286 | 1059.3% | -| TYPESCRIPT | 29 | 319 | 101.3 | 290 | 1000.0% | -| CRYSTAL | 24 | 260 | 80.7 | 236 | 983.3% | -| PHP | 23 | 235 | 85.1 | 212 | 921.7% | -| COBOL | 20 | 199 | 71.4 | 179 | 895.0% | -| RUBY | 35 | 318 | 101.0 | 283 | 808.6% | -| OCAML | 19 | 167 | 74.3 | 148 | 778.9% | -| HASKELL | 21 | 168 | 89.0 | 147 | 700.0% | -| OBJC | 29 | 223 | 86.3 | 194 | 669.0% | -| RAKU | 33 | 240 | 86.7 | 207 | 627.3% | -| JULIA | 32 | 226 | 87.7 | 194 | 606.2% | -| BASH | 35 | 233 | 96.1 | 198 | 565.7% | -| FSHARP | 26 | 165 | 71.4 | 139 | 534.6% | -| PYTHON | 40 | 253 | 93.1 | 213 | 532.5% | -| SCHEME | 24 | 146 | 76.3 | 122 | 508.3% | -| PERL | 26 | 155 | 73.1 | 129 | 496.2% | -======= | DOTNET | 5 | 102 | 59.3 | 97 | 1940.0% | | ELIXIR | 20 | 313 | 98.6 | 293 | 1465.0% | | R | 25 | 313 | 94.4 | 288 | 1152.0% | @@ -361,7 +298,6 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment. | JAVA | 33 | 219 | 73.6 | 186 | 563.6% | | SCHEME | 24 | 153 | 85.9 | 129 | 537.5% | | FSHARP | 26 | 165 | 71.6 | 139 | 534.6% | ->>>>>>> Stashed changes --- @@ -423,10 +359,7 @@ Individual Reports → Aggregation Script → Chart Generation (via UN) → Fina - `reports/4.2.6/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-19T20:22:16Z - `reports/4.2.7/perf.json` - 631 tests, generated 2026-01-23T09:36:18Z - `reports/4.2.8/perf.json` - 645 tests, generated 2026-01-23T10:01:33Z -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -======= - `reports/4.2.9/perf.json` - 645 tests, generated 2026-01-23T10:05:34Z ->>>>>>> Stashed changes Each `perf.json` contains: @@ -623,9 +556,5 @@ For questions about this methodology or to report issues: --- **Generated by UN Inception Performance Analysis Pipeline** -<<<<<<< Updated upstream -**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-23T05:01:56.883707 -======= **Analysis Date:** 2026-01-23T05:05:53.087501 ->>>>>>> Stashed changes **Report Version:** 1.0.0