chore: bump version to 4.2.22

Consolidate dotnet SDK with sync/async implementations and add CI testing.
Move API and portal off pool to prevent failover when cammy is loaded.

AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 # UN Inception: Aggregated Performance Analysis
 
-**Analysis Date:** 1769202990.8940048
-**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 4.2.14, 4.2.15, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20, 4.2.21, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9
+**Analysis Date:** 1769203039.9327624
+**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.20, 4.2.21
 
 ---
 
 ## Executive Summary
 
-Analysis of 20 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
+Analysis of 2 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
 
 1. **Orchestrator placement on CPU-bound pool** (not an SRE best practice)
 2. **Resource contention** between the orchestrator & test jobs
@@ -22,26 +22,8 @@ Analysis of 20 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution
 
 | Release | Avg Duration | Slowest | Fastest | Change from Previous |
 |---------|--------------|---------|---------|----------------------|
-| 4.2.0 | 33s | raku (93s) | ocaml (19s) | baseline |
-| 4.2.10 | 153s | scheme (320s) | bash (29s) | +120s (+363.6%) |
-| 4.2.11 | 103s | deno (289s) | cpp (43s) | -50s (-32.7%) |
-| 4.2.12 | 142s | go (406s) | erlang (21s) | +39s (+37.9%) |
-| 4.2.13 | 126s | deno (290s) | haskell (23s) | -16s (-11.3%) |
-| 4.2.14 | 97s | javascript (172s) | go (38s) | -29s (-23.0%) |
-| 4.2.15 | 103s | d (203s) | cobol (49s) | +6s (+6.2%) |
-| 4.2.16 | 98s | javascript (361s) | c (40s) | -5s (-4.9%) |
-| 4.2.17 | 104s | ruby (270s) | objc (17s) | +6s (+6.1%) |
-| 4.2.18 | 100s | r (298s) | scheme (48s) | -4s (-3.8%) |
-| 4.2.19 | 151s | lua (472s) | dart (40s) | +51s (+51.0%) |
-| 4.2.20 | 114s | java (272s) | crystal (49s) | -37s (-24.5%) |
+| 4.2.20 | 114s | java (272s) | crystal (49s) | baseline |
 | 4.2.21 | 102s | nim (215s) | erlang (22s) | -12s (-10.5%) |
-| 4.2.3 | 63s | rust (142s) | v (40s) | -39s (-38.2%) |
-| 4.2.4 | 70s | python (110s) | c (23s) | +7s (+11.1%) |
-| 4.2.5 | 67s | v (114s) | erlang (44s) | -3s (-4.3%) |
-| 4.2.6 | 54s | haskell (128s) | awk (23s) | -13s (-19.4%) |
-| 4.2.7 | 117s | typescript (319s) | dotnet (5s) | +63s (+116.7%) |
-| 4.2.8 | 111s | kotlin (313s) | fortran (28s) | -6s (-5.1%) |
-| 4.2.9 | 107s | ruby (279s) | d (19s) | -4s (-3.6%) |
 
 **Observation:** Average duration increased **0.0%** from 0s to 0s.
 
@@ -57,120 +39,30 @@ This **2-3x variance** is NOT normal for identical workloads. Indicates:
 The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
 
 
-**PERL:**
-  - 4.2.0: 26s
-  - 4.2.10: 105s
-  - 4.2.11: 58s
-  - 4.2.12: 55s
-  - 4.2.13: 108s
-  - 4.2.14: 140s
-  - 4.2.15: 64s
-  - 4.2.16: 82s
-  - 4.2.17: 38s
-  - 4.2.18: 93s
-  - 4.2.19: 468s
-  - 4.2.20: 191s
-  - 4.2.21: 104s
-  - 4.2.3: 66s
-  - 4.2.4: 77s
-  - 4.2.5: 53s
-  - 4.2.6: 44s
-  - 4.2.7: 155s
-  - 4.2.8: 91s
-  - 4.2.9: 158s
-  - **Range:** 26s → 468s (1700.0% variance)
+**COBOL:**
+  - 4.2.20: 198s
+  - 4.2.21: 62s
+  - **Range:** 62s → 198s (219.4% variance)
 
-**LUA:**
-  - 4.2.0: 32s
-  - 4.2.10: 51s
-  - 4.2.11: 56s
-  - 4.2.12: 53s
-  - 4.2.13: 203s
-  - 4.2.14: 127s
-  - 4.2.15: 166s
-  - 4.2.16: 242s
-  - 4.2.17: 40s
-  - 4.2.18: 73s
-  - 4.2.19: 472s
-  - 4.2.20: 133s
-  - 4.2.21: 183s
-  - 4.2.3: 63s
-  - 4.2.4: 71s
-  - 4.2.5: 52s
-  - 4.2.6: 36s
-  - 4.2.7: 152s
-  - 4.2.8: 84s
-  - 4.2.9: 56s
-  - **Range:** 32s → 472s (1375.0% variance)
+**AWK:**
+  - 4.2.20: 145s
+  - 4.2.21: 33s
+  - **Range:** 33s → 145s (339.4% variance)
 
-**JAVA:**
-  - 4.2.0: 36s
-  - 4.2.10: 122s
-  - 4.2.11: 133s
-  - 4.2.12: 116s
-  - 4.2.13: 240s
-  - 4.2.14: 105s
-  - 4.2.15: 60s
-  - 4.2.16: 52s
-  - 4.2.17: 84s
-  - 4.2.18: 92s
-  - 4.2.19: 423s
-  - 4.2.20: 272s
+**NIM:**
+  - 4.2.20: 103s
+  - 4.2.21: 215s
+  - **Range:** 103s → 215s (108.7% variance)
+
+**TYPESCRIPT:**
+  - 4.2.20: 138s
+  - 4.2.21: 39s
+  - **Range:** 39s → 138s (253.8% variance)
+
+**CPP:**
+  - 4.2.20: 107s
   - 4.2.21: 204s
-  - 4.2.3: 67s
-  - 4.2.4: 57s
-  - 4.2.5: 62s
-  - 4.2.6: 70s
-  - 4.2.7: 33s
-  - 4.2.8: 45s
-  - 4.2.9: 219s
-  - **Range:** 33s → 423s (1181.8% variance)
-
-**CRYSTAL:**
-  - 4.2.0: 24s
-  - 4.2.10: 89s
-  - 4.2.11: 90s
-  - 4.2.12: 397s
-  - 4.2.13: 158s
-  - 4.2.14: 87s
-  - 4.2.15: 74s
-  - 4.2.16: 273s
-  - 4.2.17: 55s
-  - 4.2.18: 101s
-  - 4.2.19: 100s
-  - 4.2.20: 49s
-  - 4.2.21: 76s
-  - 4.2.3: 61s
-  - 4.2.4: 60s
-  - 4.2.5: 88s
-  - 4.2.6: 28s
-  - 4.2.7: 260s
-  - 4.2.8: 44s
-  - 4.2.9: 221s
-  - **Range:** 24s → 397s (1554.2% variance)
-
-**GROOVY:**
-  - 4.2.0: 23s
-  - 4.2.10: 151s
-  - 4.2.11: 90s
-  - 4.2.12: 393s
-  - 4.2.13: 39s
-  - 4.2.14: 93s
-  - 4.2.15: 69s
-  - 4.2.16: 44s
-  - 4.2.17: 151s
-  - 4.2.18: 150s
-  - 4.2.19: 115s
-  - 4.2.20: 75s
-  - 4.2.21: 75s
-  - 4.2.3: 60s
-  - 4.2.4: 59s
-  - 4.2.5: 70s
-  - 4.2.6: 40s
-  - 4.2.7: 36s
-  - 4.2.8: 41s
-  - 4.2.9: 98s
-  - **Range:** 23s → 393s (1608.7% variance)
+  - **Range:** 107s → 204s (90.7% variance)
 
 
 ---
@@ -179,49 +71,13 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
 
 **Fastest Languages by Run:**
 
-4.2.0: ocaml, tcl, elixir, csharp, cobol
-4.2.10: bash, powershell, erlang, ruby, typescript
-4.2.11: cpp, forth, lua, typescript, ruby
-4.2.12: erlang, php, python, javascript, haskell
-4.2.13: haskell, v, groovy, nim, kotlin
-4.2.14: go, cpp, powershell, erlang, typescript
-4.2.15: cobol, csharp, ocaml, objc, kotlin
-4.2.16: cpp, c, raku, awk, groovy
-4.2.17: objc, python, erlang, csharp, perl
-4.2.18: scheme, tcl, fortran, c, raku
-4.2.19: dart, python, typescript, javascript, dotnet
 4.2.20: crystal, v, deno, r, csharp
 4.2.21: erlang, r, ruby, awk, typescript
-4.2.3: v, d, kotlin, awk, raku
-4.2.4: c, d, cobol, raku, v
-4.2.5: erlang, awk, bash, deno, tcl
-4.2.6: awk, powershell, crystal, raku, erlang
-4.2.7: dotnet, deno, awk, fortran, commonlisp
-4.2.8: fortran, groovy, crystal, java, powershell
-4.2.9: d, julia, csharp, v, objc
 
 **Slowest Languages by Run:**
 
-4.2.0: raku, javascript, cpp, rust, go
-4.2.10: scheme, clojure, deno, c, julia
-4.2.11: deno, awk, erlang, elixir, clojure
-4.2.12: go, crystal, groovy, deno, awk
-4.2.13: deno, raku, awk, cpp, java
-4.2.14: javascript, python, php, bash, elixir
-4.2.15: d, cpp, ruby, bash, lua
-4.2.16: javascript, clojure, crystal, lua, fsharp
-4.2.17: ruby, typescript, php, cobol, commonlisp
-4.2.18: r, go, elixir, rust, forth
-4.2.19: lua, perl, java, ruby, powershell
 4.2.20: java, zig, cobol, perl, haskell
 4.2.21: nim, dart, java, cpp, rust
-4.2.3: rust, c, python, typescript, javascript
-4.2.4: python, javascript, elixir, scheme, bash
-4.2.5: v, haskell, scheme, ocaml, powershell
-4.2.6: haskell, go, cpp, rust, forth
-4.2.7: typescript, ruby, r, elixir, crystal
-4.2.8: kotlin, python, javascript, tcl, raku
-4.2.9: ruby, deno, rust, crystal, java
 
 **Conclusion:** No consistent "fast" or "slow" languages across runs. This proves:
 - Execution order is random or system-dependent
@@ -303,25 +159,25 @@ If concurrency was fixed at N parallel jobs:
 ### Most Variable Languages
 
 
-PERL: 26s → 468s (+1700.0%)
+COBOL: 62s → 198s (+219.4%)
 
-LUA: 32s → 472s (+1375.0%)
+AWK: 33s → 145s (+339.4%)
 
-JAVA: 33s → 423s (+1181.8%)
+NIM: 103s → 215s (+108.7%)
 
-CRYSTAL: 24s → 397s (+1554.2%)
+TYPESCRIPT: 39s → 138s (+253.8%)
 
-GROOVY: 23s → 393s (+1608.7%)
+CPP: 107s → 204s (+90.7%)
 
-GO: 38s → 406s (+968.4%)
+PERL: 104s → 191s (+83.7%)
 
-JAVASCRIPT: 32s → 361s (+1028.1%)
+BASH: 104s → 186s (+78.8%)
 
-SCHEME: 24s → 320s (+1233.3%)
+DART: 127s → 208s (+63.8%)
 
-ELIXIR: 20s → 313s (+1465.0%)
+RAKU: 83s → 154s (+85.5%)
 
-TYPESCRIPT: 29s → 319s (+1000.0%)
+FORTH: 73s → 142s (+94.5%)
 
 
 These languages are most affected by resource contention. Likely reasons:
@@ -374,26 +230,26 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment.
 
 | Language | Min (s) | Max (s) | Avg (s) | Range (s) | Variance % |
 |----------|---------|---------|---------|-----------|------------|
-| DOTNET | 5 | 125 | 79.5 | 120 | 2400.0% |
-| PERL | 26 | 468 | 108.8 | 442 | 1700.0% |
-| GROOVY | 23 | 393 | 93.6 | 370 | 1608.7% |
-| CRYSTAL | 24 | 397 | 116.8 | 373 | 1554.2% |
-| ELIXIR | 20 | 313 | 117.7 | 293 | 1465.0% |
-| CLOJURE | 21 | 310 | 110.0 | 289 | 1376.2% |
-| LUA | 32 | 472 | 117.2 | 440 | 1375.0% |
-| COBOL | 20 | 290 | 99.8 | 270 | 1350.0% |
-| SCHEME | 24 | 320 | 104.2 | 296 | 1233.3% |
-| PYTHON | 19 | 253 | 88.8 | 234 | 1231.6% |
-| AWK | 23 | 306 | 115.8 | 283 | 1230.4% |
-| OBJC | 17 | 223 | 88.8 | 206 | 1211.8% |
-| R | 24 | 313 | 112.9 | 289 | 1204.2% |
-| DENO | 24 | 310 | 124.8 | 286 | 1191.7% |
-| JAVA | 33 | 423 | 124.6 | 390 | 1181.8% |
-| OCAML | 19 | 240 | 96.7 | 221 | 1163.2% |
-| TCL | 20 | 247 | 92.2 | 227 | 1135.0% |
-| C | 23 | 276 | 95.8 | 253 | 1100.0% |
-| CSHARP | 20 | 235 | 84.2 | 215 | 1075.0% |
-| KOTLIN | 27 | 313 | 100.0 | 286 | 1059.3% |
+| AWK | 33 | 145 | 89.0 | 112 | 339.4% |
+| ERLANG | 22 | 79 | 50.5 | 57 | 259.1% |
+| TYPESCRIPT | 39 | 138 | 88.5 | 99 | 253.8% |
+| COBOL | 62 | 198 | 130.0 | 136 | 219.4% |
+| RUBY | 30 | 89 | 59.5 | 59 | 196.7% |
+| R | 24 | 57 | 40.5 | 33 | 137.5% |
+| V | 56 | 121 | 88.5 | 65 | 116.1% |
+| CSHARP | 58 | 123 | 90.5 | 65 | 112.1% |
+| NIM | 103 | 215 | 159.0 | 112 | 108.7% |
+| JAVASCRIPT | 42 | 87 | 64.5 | 45 | 107.1% |
+| PYTHON | 43 | 88 | 65.5 | 45 | 104.7% |
+| FORTH | 73 | 142 | 107.5 | 69 | 94.5% |
+| CPP | 107 | 204 | 155.5 | 97 | 90.7% |
+| C | 76 | 144 | 110.0 | 68 | 89.5% |
+| RAKU | 83 | 154 | 118.5 | 71 | 85.5% |
+| PERL | 104 | 191 | 147.5 | 87 | 83.7% |
+| BASH | 104 | 186 | 145.0 | 82 | 78.8% |
+| FSHARP | 73 | 125 | 99.0 | 52 | 71.2% |
+| DART | 127 | 208 | 167.5 | 81 | 63.8% |
+| CRYSTAL | 49 | 76 | 62.5 | 27 | 55.1% |
 
 
 ---
@@ -448,26 +304,8 @@ Individual Reports → Aggregation Script → Chart Generation (via UN) → Fina
 ### Data Sources
 
 **Input Files:**
-- `reports/4.2.0/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-18T23:20:51Z
-- `reports/4.2.10/perf.json` - 673 tests, generated 2026-01-23T11:46:18Z
-- `reports/4.2.11/perf.json` - 669 tests, generated 2026-01-23T12:14:08Z
-- `reports/4.2.12/perf.json` - 665 tests, generated 2026-01-23T13:30:32Z
-- `reports/4.2.13/perf.json` - 673 tests, generated 2026-01-23T14:19:49Z
-- `reports/4.2.14/perf.json` - 661 tests, generated 2026-01-23T14:48:26Z
-- `reports/4.2.15/perf.json` - 657 tests, generated 2026-01-23T15:14:36Z
-- `reports/4.2.16/perf.json` - 665 tests, generated 2026-01-23T15:25:53Z
-- `reports/4.2.17/perf.json` - 665 tests, generated 2026-01-23T15:34:55Z
-- `reports/4.2.18/perf.json` - 665 tests, generated 2026-01-23T16:05:03Z
-- `reports/4.2.19/perf.json` - 701 tests, generated 2026-01-23T20:20:06Z
 - `reports/4.2.20/perf.json` - 685 tests, generated 2026-01-23T20:41:23Z
 - `reports/4.2.21/perf.json` - 661 tests, generated 2026-01-23T21:16:07Z
-- `reports/4.2.3/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-19T11:58:45Z
-- `reports/4.2.4/perf.json` - 682 tests, generated 2026-01-19T12:02:14Z
-- `reports/4.2.5/perf.json` - 658 tests, generated 2026-01-19T19:10:23Z
-- `reports/4.2.6/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-19T20:22:16Z
-- `reports/4.2.7/perf.json` - 631 tests, generated 2026-01-23T09:36:18Z
-- `reports/4.2.8/perf.json` - 645 tests, generated 2026-01-23T10:01:33Z
-- `reports/4.2.9/perf.json` - 645 tests, generated 2026-01-23T10:05:34Z
 
 
 Each `perf.json` contains:
@@ -664,5 +502,5 @@ For questions about this methodology or to report issues:
 ---
 
 **Generated by UN Inception Performance Analysis Pipeline**
-**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-23T16:16:31.013605
+**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-23T16:21:28.533747
 **Report Version:** 1.0.0

VERSION

@@ -1 +1 @@
-4.2.21
+4.2.22

clients/c/src/un.c

@@ -6013,7 +6013,7 @@ void print_usage(const char *prog) {
  * ============================================================================ */
 
 const char *unsandbox_version(void) {
-    return "4.2.21";
+    return "4.2.22";
 }
 
 const char *unsandbox_detect_language(const char *filename) {

clients/dotnet/async/src/Un.cs

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ using System.Text.Json.Serialization;
 
 const string API_BASE = "https://api.unsandbox.com";
 const string PORTAL_BASE = "https://unsandbox.com";
-const string VERSION = "4.2.6";
+const string VERSION = "4.2.22";
 
 // ANSI colors
 const string BLUE = "\x1B[34m";

clients/dotnet/sync/src/Un.cs

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ using System.Text.Json.Serialization;
 
 const string API_BASE = "https://api.unsandbox.com";
 const string PORTAL_BASE = "https://unsandbox.com";
-const string VERSION = "4.2.6";
+const string VERSION = "4.2.22";
 
 // ANSI colors
 const string BLUE = "\x1B[34m";

clients/groovy/sync/src/un.groovy

@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
  * </ol>
  *
  * @author Permacomputer Project
- * @version 4.2.21
+ * @version 4.2.22
  */
 
 import javax.crypto.Mac

clients/javascript/async/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "un-async",
-  "version": "4.2.21",
+  "version": "4.2.22",
   "description": "Unsandbox async JavaScript SDK - Execute code in 50+ languages",
   "main": "src/un_async.js",
   "type": "module",

clients/javascript/sync/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "un-sync",
-  "version": "4.2.21",
+  "version": "4.2.22",
   "description": "unsandbox.com JavaScript SDK (Isomorphic - Node.js + Browser)",
   "type": "module",
   "main": "src/un.js",

clients/lua/sync/src/un.lua

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ local ltn12 = require("ltn12")
 
 local Un = {}
 Un.API_BASE = "https://api.unsandbox.com"
-Un.VERSION = "4.2.21"
+Un.VERSION = "4.2.22"
 
 -- Credential loading
 function Un.load_accounts_csv(path)

clients/perl/sync/src/un.pl

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ use Digest::HMAC_SHA256 qw(hmac_sha256_hex);
 use File::HomeDir;
 use Time::HiRes qw(time sleep);
 
-our $VERSION = "4.2.21";
+our $VERSION = "4.2.22";
 our $API_BASE = 'https://api.unsandbox.com';
 
 # Credential system

clients/python/async/setup.py

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ from setuptools import setup, find_packages
 
 setup(
     name="unsandbox-async",
-    version="4.2.21",
+    version="4.2.22",
     description="Asynchronous Python SDK for unsandbox.com code execution",
     long_description=open("README.md").read() if False else "Async Python SDK for unsandbox code execution",
     author="unsandbox.com",

clients/python/sync/setup.py

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ with open("README.md", "r", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
 
 setup(
     name="unsandbox",
-    version="4.2.21",
+    version="4.2.22",
     author="Unsandbox",
     description="Synchronous Python SDK for unsandbox.com code execution",
     long_description=long_description,

clients/python/sync/src/__init__.py

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ from .un import (
     CredentialsError,
 )
 
-__version__ = "4.2.21"
+__version__ = "4.2.22"
 __all__ = [
     "execute_code",
     "execute_async",

clients/rust/async/Cargo.toml

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 [package]
 name = "un-async"
-version = "4.2.21"
+version = "4.2.22"
 edition = "2021"
 authors = ["unsandbox.com"]
 description = "Asynchronous Rust SDK for unsandbox.com secure code execution API"

clients/rust/sync/Cargo.toml

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 [package]
 name = "un-sync"
-version = "4.2.21"
+version = "4.2.22"
 edition = "2021"
 authors = ["unsandbox.com"]
 description = "Synchronous Rust SDK for unsandbox.com secure code execution API"