perf: Update aggregated performance analysis [ci skip]

This commit is contained in:
GitLab CI 2026-01-29 10:59:19 -05:00
parent 89219909c8
commit 9ec2f5a4e7

View file

@ -1,13 +1,22 @@
# UN Inception: Aggregated Performance Analysis
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
**Analysis Date:** 1769694997.882417
**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 4.2.14, 4.2.15, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20, 4.2.21, 4.2.22, 4.2.23, 4.2.24, 4.2.25, 4.2.26, 4.2.27, 4.2.28, 4.2.29, 4.2.3, 4.2.30, 4.2.31, 4.2.32, 4.2.36, 4.2.37, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9
=======
**Analysis Date:** 1769702356.2085507
**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 4.2.14, 4.2.15, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20, 4.2.21, 4.2.22, 4.2.23, 4.2.24, 4.2.25, 4.2.26, 4.2.27, 4.2.28, 4.2.29, 4.2.3, 4.2.30, 4.2.31, 4.2.32, 4.2.36, 4.2.37, 4.2.38, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
---
## Executive Summary
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
Analysis of 33 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
=======
Analysis of 34 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
1. **Orchestrator placement on CPU-bound pool** (not an SRE best practice)
2. **Resource contention** between the orchestrator & test jobs
@ -49,7 +58,12 @@ Analysis of 33 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution
| 4.2.32 | 99s | kotlin (159s) | cpp (32s) | +25s (+33.8%) |
| 4.2.36 | 1528s | scheme (1574s) | erlang (1236s) | +1429s (+1443.4%) |
| 4.2.37 | 267s | rust (721s) | powershell (41s) | -1261s (-82.5%) |
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
| 4.2.4 | 70s | python (110s) | c (23s) | -197s (-73.8%) |
=======
| 4.2.38 | 396s | php (1047s) | awk (25s) | +129s (+48.3%) |
| 4.2.4 | 70s | python (110s) | c (23s) | -326s (-82.3%) |
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
| 4.2.5 | 67s | v (114s) | erlang (44s) | -3s (-4.3%) |
| 4.2.6 | 54s | haskell (128s) | awk (23s) | -13s (-19.4%) |
| 4.2.7 | 117s | typescript (319s) | dotnet (5s) | +63s (+116.7%) |
@ -98,6 +112,10 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
- 4.2.32: 81s
- 4.2.36: 1536s
- 4.2.37: 504s
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
- 4.2.38: 675s
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
- 4.2.4: 109s
- 4.2.5: 60s
- 4.2.6: 50s
@ -134,6 +152,10 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
- 4.2.32: 82s
- 4.2.36: 1566s
- 4.2.37: 48s
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
- 4.2.38: 904s
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
- 4.2.4: 74s
- 4.2.5: 52s
- 4.2.6: 47s
@ -170,6 +192,10 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
- 4.2.32: 98s
- 4.2.36: 1574s
- 4.2.37: 50s
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
- 4.2.38: 581s
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
- 4.2.4: 100s
- 4.2.5: 102s
- 4.2.6: 42s
@ -206,6 +232,10 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
- 4.2.32: 55s
- 4.2.36: 1574s
- 4.2.37: 88s
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
- 4.2.38: 796s
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
- 4.2.4: 110s
- 4.2.5: 61s
- 4.2.6: 52s
@ -242,6 +272,10 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
- 4.2.32: 99s
- 4.2.36: 1572s
- 4.2.37: 689s
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
- 4.2.38: 396s
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
- 4.2.4: 96s
- 4.2.5: 51s
- 4.2.6: 42s
@ -284,6 +318,10 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
4.2.32: cpp, c, raku, go, python
4.2.36: erlang, awk, powershell, csharp, kotlin
4.2.37: powershell, erlang, cpp, r, scheme
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
4.2.38: awk, powershell, ruby, erlang, objc
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
4.2.4: c, d, cobol, raku, v
4.2.5: erlang, awk, bash, deno, tcl
4.2.6: awk, powershell, crystal, raku, erlang
@ -320,6 +358,10 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
4.2.32: kotlin, cobol, fortran, d, zig
4.2.36: scheme, python, tcl, elixir, r
4.2.37: rust, ruby, php, dotnet, tcl
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
4.2.38: php, raku, r, bash, clojure
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
4.2.4: python, javascript, elixir, scheme, bash
4.2.5: v, haskell, scheme, ocaml, powershell
4.2.6: haskell, go, cpp, rust, forth
@ -336,14 +378,24 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
### 4. API Health Trends
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
**Overall API Health:** 0.0/100 (avg across 2 releases)
**Trend:** STABLE
**Total Retries (all releases):** 2273
=======
**Overall API Health:** 0.0/100 (avg across 3 releases)
**Trend:** STABLE
**Total Retries (all releases):** 2495
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
| Release | Health Score | Total Retries | 429 (Rate Limit) | 5xx (Server) | Timeout | Connection |
|---------|--------------|---------------|------------------|--------------|---------|------------|
| 4.2.36 | 0/100 | 2122 | 0 | 2122 | 0 | 0 |
| 4.2.37 | 0/100 | 151 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
| 4.2.38 | 0/100 | 222 | 0 | 125 | 0 | 0 |
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
**Interpretation:**
- **Score 95-100:** API healthy, tests pass on first attempt
@ -499,6 +551,7 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment.
| Language | Min (s) | Max (s) | Avg (s) | Range (s) | Variance % |
|----------|---------|---------|---------|-----------|------------|
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
| DOTNET | 5 | 1539 | 167.1 | 1534 | 30680.0% |
| R | 9 | 1834 | 206.1 | 1825 | 20277.8% |
| NIM | 8 | 1557 | 172.1 | 1549 | 19362.5% |
@ -519,6 +572,28 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment.
| PYTHON | 19 | 1574 | 144.5 | 1555 | 8184.2% |
| OCAML | 19 | 1537 | 163.5 | 1518 | 7989.5% |
| TCL | 20 | 1572 | 179.1 | 1552 | 7760.0% |
=======
| DOTNET | 5 | 1539 | 167.9 | 1534 | 30680.0% |
| R | 9 | 1834 | 226.6 | 1825 | 20277.8% |
| NIM | 8 | 1557 | 170.4 | 1549 | 19362.5% |
| CLOJURE | 8 | 1549 | 173.9 | 1541 | 19262.5% |
| FORTRAN | 8 | 1547 | 135.9 | 1539 | 19237.5% |
| PERL | 8 | 1546 | 169.0 | 1538 | 19225.0% |
| D | 8 | 1545 | 135.4 | 1537 | 19212.5% |
| ZIG | 8 | 1542 | 216.6 | 1534 | 19175.0% |
| FORTH | 8 | 1540 | 173.3 | 1532 | 19150.0% |
| KOTLIN | 8 | 1536 | 147.2 | 1528 | 19100.0% |
| CSHARP | 8 | 1534 | 159.8 | 1526 | 19075.0% |
| LUA | 9 | 1548 | 193.5 | 1539 | 17100.0% |
| PROLOG | 9 | 1540 | 127.5 | 1531 | 17011.1% |
| RUST | 9 | 1537 | 177.8 | 1528 | 16977.8% |
| SCHEME | 15 | 1574 | 164.1 | 1559 | 10393.3% |
| OBJC | 17 | 1559 | 152.9 | 1542 | 9070.6% |
| POWERSHELL | 14 | 1269 | 118.7 | 1255 | 8964.3% |
| PYTHON | 19 | 1574 | 163.7 | 1555 | 8184.2% |
| OCAML | 19 | 1537 | 167.5 | 1518 | 7989.5% |
| TCL | 20 | 1572 | 185.5 | 1552 | 7760.0% |
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
---
@ -600,6 +675,10 @@ Individual Reports → Aggregation Script → Chart Generation (via UN) → Fina
- `reports/4.2.32/perf.json` - 776 tests, generated 2026-01-28T22:23:28Z
- `reports/4.2.36/perf.json` - 860 tests, generated 2026-01-29T02:03:51Z
- `reports/4.2.37/perf.json` - 812 tests, generated 2026-01-29T13:55:52Z
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
=======
- `reports/4.2.38/perf.json` - 832 tests, generated 2026-01-29T15:57:07Z
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
- `reports/4.2.4/perf.json` - 682 tests, generated 2026-01-19T12:02:14Z
- `reports/4.2.5/perf.json` - 658 tests, generated 2026-01-19T19:10:23Z
- `reports/4.2.6/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-19T20:22:16Z
@ -802,5 +881,9 @@ For questions about this methodology or to report issues:
---
**Generated by UN Inception Performance Analysis Pipeline**
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-29T08:56:38.007482
=======
**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-29T10:59:16.340449
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
**Report Version:** 1.0.0