fix: regenerate aggregate report to resolve merge conflicts [ci skip]

AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md

@@ -1,22 +1,13 @@
 # UN Inception: Aggregated Performance Analysis
 
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-**Analysis Date:** 1769282055.7116168
-**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 4.2.14, 4.2.15, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20, 4.2.21, 4.2.22, 4.2.24, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9
-=======
-**Analysis Date:** 1769282070.5510108
+**Analysis Date:** 1769287519.037188
 **Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 4.2.14, 4.2.15, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20, 4.2.21, 4.2.22, 4.2.23, 4.2.24, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 
 ---
 
 ## Executive Summary
 
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-Analysis of 22 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
-=======
 Analysis of 23 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 
 1. **Orchestrator placement on CPU-bound pool** (not an SRE best practice)
 2. **Resource contention** between the orchestrator & test jobs
@@ -45,12 +36,8 @@ Analysis of 23 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution
 | 4.2.20 | 114s | java (272s) | crystal (49s) | -37s (-24.5%) |
 | 4.2.21 | 102s | nim (215s) | erlang (22s) | -12s (-10.5%) |
 | 4.2.22 | 300s | javascript (2173s) | clojure (14s) | +198s (+194.1%) |
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-| 4.2.24 | 129s | python (494s) | clojure (8s) | -171s (-57.0%) |
-=======
 | 4.2.23 | 373s | zig (1058s) | perl (8s) | +73s (+24.3%) |
 | 4.2.24 | 129s | python (494s) | clojure (8s) | -244s (-65.4%) |
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 | 4.2.3 | 63s | rust (142s) | v (40s) | -66s (-51.2%) |
 | 4.2.4 | 70s | python (110s) | c (23s) | +7s (+11.1%) |
 | 4.2.5 | 67s | v (114s) | erlang (44s) | -3s (-4.3%) |
@@ -88,10 +75,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.20: 87s
   - 4.2.21: 42s
   - 4.2.22: 2173s
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-=======
   - 4.2.23: 425s
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
   - 4.2.24: 242s
   - 4.2.3: 75s
   - 4.2.4: 109s
@@ -117,10 +101,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.20: 57s
   - 4.2.21: 24s
   - 4.2.22: 1834s
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-=======
   - 4.2.23: 9s
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
   - 4.2.24: 434s
   - 4.2.3: 64s
   - 4.2.4: 74s
@@ -146,10 +127,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.20: 103s
   - 4.2.21: 215s
   - 4.2.22: 1217s
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-=======
   - 4.2.23: 286s
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
   - 4.2.24: 8s
   - 4.2.3: 52s
   - 4.2.4: 76s
@@ -175,10 +153,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.20: 224s
   - 4.2.21: 192s
   - 4.2.22: 1014s
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-=======
   - 4.2.23: 1058s
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
   - 4.2.24: 8s
   - 4.2.3: 61s
   - 4.2.4: 60s
@@ -187,34 +162,6 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.7: 79s
   - 4.2.8: 187s
   - 4.2.9: 153s
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-  - **Range:** 8s → 1014s (12575.0% variance)
-
-**LUA:**
-  - 4.2.0: 32s
-  - 4.2.10: 51s
-  - 4.2.11: 56s
-  - 4.2.12: 53s
-  - 4.2.13: 203s
-  - 4.2.14: 127s
-  - 4.2.15: 166s
-  - 4.2.16: 242s
-  - 4.2.17: 40s
-  - 4.2.18: 73s
-  - 4.2.19: 472s
-  - 4.2.20: 133s
-  - 4.2.21: 183s
-  - 4.2.22: 975s
-  - 4.2.24: 9s
-  - 4.2.3: 63s
-  - 4.2.4: 71s
-  - 4.2.5: 52s
-  - 4.2.6: 36s
-  - 4.2.7: 152s
-  - 4.2.8: 84s
-  - 4.2.9: 56s
-  - **Range:** 9s → 975s (10733.3% variance)
-=======
   - **Range:** 8s → 1058s (13125.0% variance)
 
 **V:**
@@ -242,7 +189,6 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.8: 109s
   - 4.2.9: 42s
   - **Range:** 21s → 1040s (4852.4% variance)
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 
 
 ---
@@ -265,10 +211,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
 4.2.20: crystal, v, deno, r, csharp
 4.2.21: erlang, r, ruby, awk, typescript
 4.2.22: powershell, clojure, scheme, objc, v
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-=======
 4.2.23: perl, r, d, groovy, powershell
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 4.2.24: zig, nim, kotlin, fortran, forth
 4.2.3: v, d, kotlin, awk, raku
 4.2.4: c, d, cobol, raku, v
@@ -294,10 +237,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
 4.2.20: java, zig, cobol, perl, haskell
 4.2.21: nim, dart, java, cpp, rust
 4.2.22: javascript, r, nim, zig, lua
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-=======
 4.2.23: zig, v, commonlisp, deno, elixir
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 4.2.24: python, php, r, elixir, deno
 4.2.3: rust, c, python, typescript, javascript
 4.2.4: python, javascript, elixir, scheme, bash
@@ -393,35 +333,20 @@ R: 9s → 1834s (+20277.8%)
 
 NIM: 8s → 1217s (+15112.5%)
 
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-ZIG: 8s → 1014s (+12575.0%)
-
-LUA: 9s → 975s (+10733.3%)
-=======
 ZIG: 8s → 1058s (+13125.0%)
 
 V: 21s → 1040s (+4852.4%)
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 
 LUA: 9s → 975s (+10733.3%)
 
 COMMONLISP: 27s → 956s (+3440.7%)
 
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-PYTHON: 19s → 494s (+2500.0%)
-
-PHP: 23s → 471s (+1947.8%)
-
-PERL: 26s → 468s (+1700.0%)
-
-=======
 DENO: 24s → 926s (+3758.3%)
 
 ELIXIR: 20s → 917s (+4485.0%)
 
 PHP: 23s → 824s (+3482.6%)
 
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 
 These languages are most affected by resource contention. Likely reasons:
 - **Dynamic languages** (Python, Ruby, JavaScript): Startup time varies with GC/JIT
@@ -473,28 +398,6 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment.
 
 | Language | Min (s) | Max (s) | Avg (s) | Range (s) | Variance % |
 |----------|---------|---------|---------|-----------|------------|
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-| NIM | 8 | 1217 | 127.3 | 1209 | 15112.5% |
-| ZIG | 8 | 1014 | 154.8 | 1006 | 12575.0% |
-| LUA | 9 | 975 | 151.3 | 966 | 10733.3% |
-| R | 24 | 1834 | 205.7 | 1810 | 7541.7% |
-| JAVASCRIPT | 32 | 2173 | 218.7 | 2141 | 6690.6% |
-| KOTLIN | 8 | 313 | 93.7 | 305 | 3812.5% |
-| CLOJURE | 8 | 310 | 101.0 | 302 | 3775.0% |
-| HASKELL | 21 | 754 | 123.0 | 733 | 3490.5% |
-| DOTNET | 5 | 176 | 81.1 | 171 | 3420.0% |
-| CSHARP | 8 | 266 | 89.0 | 258 | 3225.0% |
-| PROLOG | 9 | 262 | 76.7 | 253 | 2811.1% |
-| FORTH | 8 | 231 | 94.0 | 223 | 2787.5% |
-| RUBY | 30 | 825 | 160.4 | 795 | 2650.0% |
-| PYTHON | 19 | 494 | 108.1 | 475 | 2500.0% |
-| RUST | 9 | 234 | 116.9 | 225 | 2500.0% |
-| D | 8 | 203 | 82.8 | 195 | 2437.5% |
-| SCHEME | 15 | 320 | 98.9 | 305 | 2033.3% |
-| PHP | 23 | 471 | 123.0 | 448 | 1947.8% |
-| ELIXIR | 20 | 404 | 129.9 | 384 | 1920.0% |
-| FORTRAN | 8 | 161 | 71.9 | 153 | 1912.5% |
-=======
 | R | 9 | 1834 | 197.2 | 1825 | 20277.8% |
 | NIM | 8 | 1217 | 134.2 | 1209 | 15112.5% |
 | ZIG | 8 | 1058 | 194.0 | 1050 | 13125.0% |
@@ -515,7 +418,6 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment.
 | PHP | 23 | 824 | 153.5 | 801 | 3482.6% |
 | TCL | 20 | 712 | 117.4 | 692 | 3460.0% |
 | COMMONLISP | 27 | 956 | 124.0 | 929 | 3440.7% |
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 
 
 ---
@@ -584,10 +486,7 @@ Individual Reports → Aggregation Script → Chart Generation (via UN) → Fina
 - `reports/4.2.20/perf.json` - 685 tests, generated 2026-01-23T20:41:23Z
 - `reports/4.2.21/perf.json` - 661 tests, generated 2026-01-23T21:16:07Z
 - `reports/4.2.22/perf.json` - 697 tests, generated 2026-01-24T17:57:56Z
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-=======
 - `reports/4.2.23/perf.json` - 713 tests, generated 2026-01-24T19:14:09Z
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
 - `reports/4.2.24/perf.json` - 665 tests, generated 2026-01-24T19:13:51Z
 - `reports/4.2.3/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-19T11:58:45Z
 - `reports/4.2.4/perf.json` - 682 tests, generated 2026-01-19T12:02:14Z
@@ -792,9 +691,5 @@ For questions about this methodology or to report issues:
 ---
 
 **Generated by UN Inception Performance Analysis Pipeline**
-<<<<<<< Updated upstream
-**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-24T14:14:15.842875
-=======
-**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-24T14:14:30.672853
->>>>>>> Stashed changes
+**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-24T15:45:42.561682
 **Report Version:** 1.0.0