perf: Update aggregated performance analysis [ci skip]
This commit is contained in:
GitLab CI
parent
eda673069f
commit
2316595f6f
1 changed files with 83 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# UN Inception: Aggregated Performance Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
**Analysis Date:** 1769632836.9671485
|
||||
|
|
@ -12,11 +13,16 @@
|
|||
**Analysis Date:** 1769638690.0262566
|
||||
**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 4.2.14, 4.2.15, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20, 4.2.21, 4.2.22, 4.2.23, 4.2.24, 4.2.25, 4.2.26, 4.2.27, 4.2.28, 4.2.29, 4.2.3, 4.2.30, 4.2.31, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
**Analysis Date:** 1769639071.8463922
|
||||
**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.10, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 4.2.14, 4.2.15, 4.2.16, 4.2.17, 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20, 4.2.21, 4.2.22, 4.2.23, 4.2.24, 4.2.25, 4.2.26, 4.2.27, 4.2.28, 4.2.29, 4.2.3, 4.2.30, 4.2.31, 4.2.32, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8, 4.2.9
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
Analysis of 28 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
|
||||
|
|
@ -26,6 +32,9 @@ Analysis of 29 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution
|
|||
=======
|
||||
Analysis of 30 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
Analysis of 31 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Orchestrator placement on CPU-bound pool** (not an SRE best practice)
|
||||
2. **Resource contention** between the orchestrator & test jobs
|
||||
|
|
@ -64,6 +73,7 @@ Analysis of 30 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution
|
|||
| 4.2.3 | 63s | rust (142s) | v (40s) | -18s (-22.2%) |
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
| 4.2.4 | 70s | python (110s) | c (23s) | +7s (+11.1%) |
|
||||
=======
|
||||
| 4.2.30 | 161s | julia (232s) | ocaml (40s) | +98s (+155.6%) |
|
||||
|
|
@ -74,6 +84,12 @@ Analysis of 30 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution
|
|||
| 4.2.31 | 74s | go (106s) | erlang (43s) | -87s (-54.0%) |
|
||||
| 4.2.4 | 70s | python (110s) | c (23s) | -4s (-5.4%) |
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
| 4.2.30 | 161s | julia (232s) | ocaml (40s) | +98s (+155.6%) |
|
||||
| 4.2.31 | 74s | go (106s) | erlang (43s) | -87s (-54.0%) |
|
||||
| 4.2.32 | 99s | kotlin (159s) | cpp (32s) | +25s (+33.8%) |
|
||||
| 4.2.4 | 70s | python (110s) | c (23s) | -29s (-29.3%) |
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
| 4.2.5 | 67s | v (114s) | erlang (44s) | -3s (-4.3%) |
|
||||
| 4.2.6 | 54s | haskell (128s) | awk (23s) | -13s (-19.4%) |
|
||||
| 4.2.7 | 117s | typescript (319s) | dotnet (5s) | +63s (+116.7%) |
|
||||
|
|
@ -119,8 +135,13 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
|
|||
- 4.2.3: 75s
|
||||
- 4.2.30: 130s
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 64s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 64s
|
||||
- 4.2.32: 81s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
- 4.2.4: 109s
|
||||
- 4.2.5: 60s
|
||||
|
|
@ -155,8 +176,13 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
|
|||
- 4.2.3: 64s
|
||||
- 4.2.30: 127s
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 61s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 61s
|
||||
- 4.2.32: 82s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
- 4.2.4: 74s
|
||||
- 4.2.5: 52s
|
||||
|
|
@ -191,8 +217,13 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
|
|||
- 4.2.3: 52s
|
||||
- 4.2.30: 181s
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 63s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 63s
|
||||
- 4.2.32: 151s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
- 4.2.4: 76s
|
||||
- 4.2.5: 58s
|
||||
|
|
@ -227,8 +258,13 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
|
|||
- 4.2.3: 61s
|
||||
- 4.2.30: 182s
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 89s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 89s
|
||||
- 4.2.32: 152s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
- 4.2.4: 60s
|
||||
- 4.2.5: 59s
|
||||
|
|
@ -263,8 +299,13 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
|
|||
- 4.2.3: 40s
|
||||
- 4.2.30: 188s
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 63s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- 4.2.31: 63s
|
||||
- 4.2.32: 147s
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
- 4.2.4: 49s
|
||||
- 4.2.5: 114s
|
||||
|
|
@ -305,9 +346,14 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
|
|||
4.2.3: v, d, kotlin, awk, raku
|
||||
4.2.30: ocaml, python, php, perl, lua
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
=======
|
||||
4.2.31: erlang, prolog, raku, dotnet, csharp
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
4.2.31: erlang, prolog, raku, dotnet, csharp
|
||||
4.2.32: cpp, c, raku, go, python
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
4.2.4: c, d, cobol, raku, v
|
||||
4.2.5: erlang, awk, bash, deno, tcl
|
||||
4.2.6: awk, powershell, crystal, raku, erlang
|
||||
|
|
@ -341,9 +387,14 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
|
|||
4.2.3: rust, c, python, typescript, javascript
|
||||
4.2.30: julia, haskell, fsharp, dart, tcl
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
=======
|
||||
4.2.31: go, rust, forth, scheme, groovy
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
4.2.31: go, rust, forth, scheme, groovy
|
||||
4.2.32: kotlin, cobol, fortran, d, zig
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
4.2.4: python, javascript, elixir, scheme, bash
|
||||
4.2.5: v, haskell, scheme, ocaml, powershell
|
||||
4.2.6: haskell, go, cpp, rust, forth
|
||||
|
|
@ -504,6 +555,7 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment.
|
|||
|----------|---------|---------|---------|-----------|------------|
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
| R | 9 | 1834 | 175.6 | 1825 | 20277.8% |
|
||||
| NIM | 8 | 1217 | 128.2 | 1209 | 15112.5% |
|
||||
| ZIG | 8 | 1058 | 179.2 | 1050 | 13125.0% |
|
||||
|
|
@ -568,6 +620,28 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment.
|
|||
| TCL | 20 | 712 | 118.4 | 692 | 3460.0% |
|
||||
| COMMONLISP | 27 | 956 | 123.7 | 929 | 3440.7% |
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
| R | 9 | 1834 | 167.3 | 1825 | 20277.8% |
|
||||
| NIM | 8 | 1217 | 128.6 | 1209 | 15112.5% |
|
||||
| ZIG | 8 | 1058 | 175.5 | 1050 | 13125.0% |
|
||||
| LUA | 9 | 975 | 139.6 | 966 | 10733.3% |
|
||||
| FORTH | 8 | 628 | 112.1 | 620 | 7750.0% |
|
||||
| DOTNET | 5 | 360 | 94.2 | 355 | 7100.0% |
|
||||
| JAVASCRIPT | 32 | 2173 | 191.4 | 2141 | 6690.6% |
|
||||
| PERL | 8 | 468 | 104.6 | 460 | 5750.0% |
|
||||
| V | 21 | 1040 | 116.9 | 1019 | 4852.4% |
|
||||
| CSHARP | 8 | 385 | 101.6 | 377 | 4712.5% |
|
||||
| ELIXIR | 20 | 917 | 145.6 | 897 | 4485.0% |
|
||||
| OBJC | 17 | 693 | 111.0 | 676 | 3976.5% |
|
||||
| KOTLIN | 8 | 313 | 101.5 | 305 | 3812.5% |
|
||||
| CLOJURE | 8 | 310 | 109.2 | 302 | 3775.0% |
|
||||
| DENO | 24 | 926 | 151.2 | 902 | 3758.3% |
|
||||
| COBOL | 20 | 759 | 137.5 | 739 | 3695.0% |
|
||||
| HASKELL | 21 | 754 | 126.6 | 733 | 3490.5% |
|
||||
| PHP | 23 | 824 | 134.1 | 801 | 3482.6% |
|
||||
| TCL | 20 | 712 | 117.7 | 692 | 3460.0% |
|
||||
| COMMONLISP | 27 | 956 | 121.8 | 929 | 3440.7% |
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -646,9 +720,14 @@ Individual Reports → Aggregation Script → Chart Generation (via UN) → Fina
|
|||
- `reports/4.2.3/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-19T11:58:45Z
|
||||
- `reports/4.2.30/perf.json` - 840 tests, generated 2026-01-28T22:16:15Z
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- `reports/4.2.31/perf.json` - 704 tests, generated 2026-01-28T22:17:41Z
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
- `reports/4.2.31/perf.json` - 704 tests, generated 2026-01-28T22:17:41Z
|
||||
- `reports/4.2.32/perf.json` - 776 tests, generated 2026-01-28T22:23:28Z
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
- `reports/4.2.4/perf.json` - 682 tests, generated 2026-01-19T12:02:14Z
|
||||
- `reports/4.2.5/perf.json` - 658 tests, generated 2026-01-19T19:10:23Z
|
||||
- `reports/4.2.6/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-19T20:22:16Z
|
||||
|
|
@ -853,6 +932,7 @@ For questions about this methodology or to report issues:
|
|||
**Generated by UN Inception Performance Analysis Pipeline**
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
|
||||
**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-28T15:40:37.091730
|
||||
=======
|
||||
**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-28T17:16:56.482158
|
||||
|
|
@ -860,4 +940,7 @@ For questions about this methodology or to report issues:
|
|||
=======
|
||||
**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-28T17:18:10.143038
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
=======
|
||||
**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-28T17:24:31.968520
|
||||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes
|
||||
**Report Version:** 1.0.0
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue