diff --git a/AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md b/AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md
index f73e0ac..0f1cca7 100644
--- a/AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md
+++ b/AGGREGATED-PERFORMANCE.md
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 # UN Inception: Aggregated Performance Analysis
 
-**Analysis Date:** 1769160997.9100175
-**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7
+**Analysis Date:** 1769162516.8008766
+**Reports Analyzed:** 4.2.0, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.8
 
 ---
 
 ## Executive Summary
 
-Analysis of 6 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
+Analysis of 7 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution metrics across releases. Different languages rank as slowest/fastest in different runs, indicating **non-deterministic execution patterns** likely caused by:
 
 1. **Orchestrator placement on CPU-bound pool** (not an SRE best practice)
 2. **Resource contention** between the orchestrator & test jobs
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ Analysis of 6 performance reports reveals **significant variance** in execution
 | 4.2.5 | 67s | v (114s) | erlang (44s) | -3s (-4.3%) |
 | 4.2.6 | 54s | haskell (128s) | awk (23s) | -13s (-19.4%) |
 | 4.2.7 | 117s | typescript (319s) | dotnet (5s) | +63s (+116.7%) |
+| 4.2.8 | 111s | kotlin (313s) | fortran (28s) | -6s (-5.1%) |
 
 **Observation:** Average duration increased **0.0%** from 0s to 0s.
 
@@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.5: 55s
   - 4.2.6: 41s
   - 4.2.7: 313s
+  - 4.2.8: 127s
   - **Range:** 20s → 313s (1465.0% variance)
 
 **TYPESCRIPT:**
@@ -59,6 +61,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.5: 59s
   - 4.2.6: 53s
   - 4.2.7: 319s
+  - 4.2.8: 94s
   - **Range:** 29s → 319s (1000.0% variance)
 
 **R:**
@@ -68,8 +71,19 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.5: 52s
   - 4.2.6: 47s
   - 4.2.7: 313s
+  - 4.2.8: 126s
   - **Range:** 25s → 313s (1152.0% variance)
 
+**KOTLIN:**
+  - 4.2.0: 27s
+  - 4.2.3: 45s
+  - 4.2.4: 54s
+  - 4.2.5: 61s
+  - 4.2.6: 69s
+  - 4.2.7: 49s
+  - 4.2.8: 313s
+  - **Range:** 27s → 313s (1059.3% variance)
+
 **RUBY:**
   - 4.2.0: 35s
   - 4.2.3: 74s
@@ -77,17 +91,9 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
   - 4.2.5: 60s
   - 4.2.6: 48s
   - 4.2.7: 318s
+  - 4.2.8: 93s
   - **Range:** 35s → 318s (808.6% variance)
 
-**CRYSTAL:**
-  - 4.2.0: 24s
-  - 4.2.3: 61s
-  - 4.2.4: 60s
-  - 4.2.5: 88s
-  - 4.2.6: 28s
-  - 4.2.7: 260s
-  - **Range:** 24s → 260s (983.3% variance)
-
 
 ---
 
@@ -101,6 +107,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
 4.2.5: erlang, awk, bash, deno, tcl
 4.2.6: awk, powershell, crystal, raku, erlang
 4.2.7: dotnet, deno, awk, fortran, commonlisp
+4.2.8: fortran, groovy, crystal, java, powershell
 
 **Slowest Languages by Run:**
 
@@ -110,6 +117,7 @@ The same language changes dramatically in rank between runs:
 4.2.5: v, haskell, scheme, ocaml, powershell
 4.2.6: haskell, go, cpp, rust, forth
 4.2.7: typescript, ruby, r, elixir, crystal
+4.2.8: kotlin, python, javascript, tcl, raku
 
 **Conclusion:** No consistent "fast" or "slow" languages across runs. This proves:
 - Execution order is random or system-dependent
@@ -197,19 +205,19 @@ TYPESCRIPT: 29s → 319s (+1000.0%)
 
 R: 25s → 313s (+1152.0%)
 
+KOTLIN: 27s → 313s (+1059.3%)
+
 RUBY: 35s → 318s (+808.6%)
 
 CRYSTAL: 24s → 260s (+983.3%)
 
+TCL: 20s → 247s (+1135.0%)
+
+PYTHON: 40s → 253s (+532.5%)
+
 PHP: 23s → 235s (+921.7%)
 
-BASH: 35s → 233s (+565.7%)
-
-JULIA: 32s → 226s (+606.2%)
-
-OBJC: 29s → 223s (+669.0%)
-
-PERL: 26s → 155s (+496.2%)
+RAKU: 33s → 240s (+627.3%)
 
 
 These languages are most affected by resource contention. Likely reasons:
@@ -262,26 +270,26 @@ Keep it as-is for stress testing, but in separate test environment.
 
 | Language | Min (s) | Max (s) | Avg (s) | Range (s) | Variance % |
 |----------|---------|---------|---------|-----------|------------|
-| ELIXIR | 20 | 313 | 100.5 | 293 | 1465.0% |
-| R | 25 | 313 | 95.8 | 288 | 1152.0% |
-| TYPESCRIPT | 29 | 319 | 102.5 | 290 | 1000.0% |
-| CRYSTAL | 24 | 260 | 86.8 | 236 | 983.3% |
-| PHP | 23 | 235 | 84.2 | 212 | 921.7% |
-| RUBY | 35 | 318 | 102.3 | 283 | 808.6% |
-| OBJC | 29 | 223 | 85.8 | 194 | 669.0% |
-| TCL | 20 | 148 | 69.7 | 128 | 640.0% |
+| DOTNET | 5 | 102 | 53.5 | 97 | 1940.0% |
+| ELIXIR | 20 | 313 | 104.3 | 293 | 1465.0% |
+| R | 25 | 313 | 100.1 | 288 | 1152.0% |
+| TCL | 20 | 247 | 95.0 | 227 | 1135.0% |
+| KOTLIN | 27 | 313 | 88.3 | 286 | 1059.3% |
+| TYPESCRIPT | 29 | 319 | 101.3 | 290 | 1000.0% |
+| CRYSTAL | 24 | 260 | 80.7 | 236 | 983.3% |
+| PHP | 23 | 235 | 85.1 | 212 | 921.7% |
+| COBOL | 20 | 199 | 71.4 | 179 | 895.0% |
+| RUBY | 35 | 318 | 101.0 | 283 | 808.6% |
+| OCAML | 19 | 167 | 74.3 | 148 | 778.9% |
+| HASKELL | 21 | 168 | 89.0 | 147 | 700.0% |
+| OBJC | 29 | 223 | 86.3 | 194 | 669.0% |
+| RAKU | 33 | 240 | 86.7 | 207 | 627.3% |
 | JULIA | 32 | 226 | 87.7 | 194 | 606.2% |
-| BASH | 35 | 233 | 86.3 | 198 | 565.7% |
-| HASKELL | 21 | 128 | 75.8 | 107 | 509.5% |
-| SCHEME | 24 | 146 | 79.8 | 122 | 508.3% |
-| PERL | 26 | 155 | 70.2 | 129 | 496.2% |
-| POWERSHELL | 26 | 141 | 74.0 | 115 | 442.3% |
-| V | 22 | 114 | 59.8 | 92 | 418.2% |
-| ERLANG | 29 | 148 | 70.0 | 119 | 410.3% |
-| OCAML | 19 | 94 | 58.8 | 75 | 394.7% |
-| LUA | 32 | 152 | 67.7 | 120 | 375.0% |
-| C | 23 | 107 | 61.2 | 84 | 365.2% |
-| CLOJURE | 21 | 97 | 57.5 | 76 | 361.9% |
+| BASH | 35 | 233 | 96.1 | 198 | 565.7% |
+| FSHARP | 26 | 165 | 71.4 | 139 | 534.6% |
+| PYTHON | 40 | 253 | 93.1 | 213 | 532.5% |
+| SCHEME | 24 | 146 | 76.3 | 122 | 508.3% |
+| PERL | 26 | 155 | 73.1 | 129 | 496.2% |
 
 
 ---
@@ -342,6 +350,7 @@ Individual Reports → Aggregation Script → Chart Generation (via UN) → Fina
 - `reports/4.2.5/perf.json` - 658 tests, generated 2026-01-19T19:10:23Z
 - `reports/4.2.6/perf.json` - 642 tests, generated 2026-01-19T20:22:16Z
 - `reports/4.2.7/perf.json` - 631 tests, generated 2026-01-23T09:36:18Z
+- `reports/4.2.8/perf.json` - 645 tests, generated 2026-01-23T10:01:33Z
 
 
 Each `perf.json` contains:
@@ -538,5 +547,5 @@ For questions about this methodology or to report issues:
 ---
 
 **Generated by UN Inception Performance Analysis Pipeline**
-**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-23T04:36:38.092232
+**Analysis Date:** 2026-01-23T05:01:56.883707
 **Report Version:** 1.0.0