tpmjs/packages/tools/official/diff-in-diff
Ajax Davis 5c9f1a1d0a chore: update dependencies with compatibility fixes
- Update all packages to latest versions via pnpm update --latest
- Downgrade Prisma 7 to 6 (v7 requires schema migration)
- Downgrade Tailwind CSS 4 to 3 (v4 requires PostCSS migration)
- Downgrade Storybook 10 to 8 (addons not available in v10)
- Pin cheerio to 1.0.0-rc.12 via pnpm override (type exports changed)
- Fix AI SDK tool definitions: parameters -> inputSchema
- Fix cheerio types in extract-meta and table-extract tools
- Add explicit type annotations to tool execute functions
- Migrate biome config to v2.3.11 schema

All type-checks, tests, and builds pass.
2026-01-09 22:49:41 +10:00
..
src feat: add 55 new business tools and improve existing implementations 2026-01-01 19:23:32 +10:00
CHANGELOG.md chore: version packages 2025-12-31 23:54:47 +10:00
package.json chore: update dependencies with compatibility fixes 2026-01-09 22:49:41 +10:00
README.md feat: add 100+ official TPMJS tools 2025-12-31 22:55:56 +10:00
tsconfig.json feat: add 100+ official TPMJS tools 2025-12-31 22:55:56 +10:00
tsup.config.ts feat: add 100+ official TPMJS tools 2025-12-31 22:55:56 +10:00

Difference-in-Differences (DiD)

Causal inference estimator for measuring treatment effects using before/after comparison with a control group.

Installation

npm install @tpmjs/tools-diff-in-diff

Usage

import { diffInDiffTool } from '@tpmjs/tools-diff-in-diff';

// Example: Evaluate impact of a policy intervention
// Treatment group: Cities that implemented the policy
// Control group: Cities that did not implement the policy
const result = await diffInDiffTool.execute({
  treatmentBefore: [100, 105, 98, 102],   // Before policy
  treatmentAfter: [120, 125, 118, 122],    // After policy
  controlBefore: [95, 100, 92, 98],        // Before (no policy)
  controlAfter: [98, 103, 95, 101],        // After (no policy)
  confidenceLevel: 0.95,
});

console.log(result);
// {
//   effect: 17.5,              // Treatment caused 17.5 unit increase
//   standardError: 2.1,
//   tStatistic: 8.33,
//   pValue: 0.0001,
//   significant: true,
//   confidenceInterval: {
//     lower: 13.2,
//     upper: 21.8,
//     level: 0.95
//   },
//   interpretation: "The treatment effect is 17.5 (increased by 17.5 units)...",
//   groupMeans: {
//     treatmentBefore: 101.25,
//     treatmentAfter: 121.25,
//     controlBefore: 96.25,
//     controlAfter: 99.25
//   },
//   differences: {
//     treatmentDiff: 20.0,     // Treatment group change
//     controlDiff: 3.0         // Control group change
//   }
// }

API

Input

  • treatmentBefore (required): Treatment group values before intervention
  • treatmentAfter (required): Treatment group values after intervention
  • controlBefore (required): Control group values before intervention
  • controlAfter (required): Control group values after intervention
  • confidenceLevel (optional): Confidence level (default: 0.95)

Output

  • effect: Estimated causal treatment effect (DiD estimator)
  • standardError: Standard error of the estimate
  • tStatistic: Test statistic for significance testing
  • pValue: Two-tailed p-value
  • significant: Whether effect is statistically significant
  • confidenceInterval: Confidence interval for the effect
  • interpretation: Plain English interpretation
  • groupMeans: Mean values for all four groups
  • differences: Within-group changes over time

Algorithm

The DiD estimator removes time-invariant confounders by differencing:

Formula: DiD = (T_after - T_before) - (C_after - C_before)

Where:

  • T = Treatment group
  • C = Control group

This double-differencing removes:

  1. Time trends (via control group)
  2. Group differences (via before/after comparison)

Key Assumption: Parallel trends - Without treatment, both groups would have changed similarly.

Use Cases

  • Policy evaluation: Measure impact of new regulations
  • Marketing: Test effectiveness of campaigns
  • Medicine: Clinical trials with before/after measurements
  • Economics: Evaluate economic interventions
  • Education: Assess program effectiveness

Example: Minimum Wage Study

// States that raised minimum wage (treatment)
// vs states that didn't (control)
const result = await diffInDiffTool.execute({
  treatmentBefore: [5.2, 5.5, 5.1, 5.4], // Employment before
  treatmentAfter: [5.1, 5.3, 5.0, 5.2],  // Employment after
  controlBefore: [5.3, 5.4, 5.2, 5.5],
  controlAfter: [5.4, 5.5, 5.3, 5.6],
});

// Effect tells us the causal impact on employment

Interpretation

A positive effect means treatment increased the outcome. A negative effect means treatment decreased the outcome.

Statistical significance (p < 0.05) suggests the effect is real, not due to chance.

Limitations

  • Requires parallel trends assumption
  • Can't control for time-varying confounders
  • Sensitive to outliers
  • Needs sufficient sample size

License

MIT