opencompletion.com/research/activity33-environmental-science.yaml

default_max_attempts_per_step: 3
tokens_for_ai_rubric: 'Evaluate the student''s understanding of environmental science and sustainability.

  Consider:

  - Their grasp of ecosystem connections and interdependencies

  - Understanding of environmental impacts

  - Ability to think about tradeoffs and systems thinking

  - Engagement with sustainability concepts

  - Quality of their decision-making and reasoning


  Provide encouraging feedback and suggestions for how they can apply sustainable thinking in their own lives.

  '
sections:
- section_id: introduction
  title: Welcome to Environmental Consulting
  steps:
  - step_id: welcome
    title: Welcome Environmental Consultant
    content_blocks:
    - '# Environmental Science & Sustainability 🌱'
    - Welcome, Environmental Consultant!
    - ''
    - You've been hired to help redesign River City to be more sustainable and environmentally friendly.
    - ''
    - '**Your mission:**'
    - Make decisions that balance environmental protection, economic needs, and quality of life.
    - ''
    - '**You''ll learn about:**'
    - '- Ecosystem interdependencies'
    - '- Carbon footprint and climate impact'
    - '- Renewable vs non-renewable energy'
    - '- Sustainable urban planning'
    - '- Biodiversity and habitat protection'
    - '- Systems thinking and tradeoffs'
    - ''
    - '**How it works:**'
    - You'll face real-world environmental challenges. Each decision affects the city's Environmental Health Score.
    - ''
    - Think carefully about both immediate and long-term consequences!
    question: Are you ready to create a more sustainable River City?
    tokens_for_ai: 'Student is expressing readiness.


      Categorize as:

      - ready: Positive, ready to begin

      - set_language: Setting language preference

      - off_topic: Unrelated

      '
    buckets:
    - ready
    - set_language
    - off_topic
    transitions:
      ready:
        content_blocks:
        - Excellent! Let's start with your first environmental challenge.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: '50'
          decisions_made: '0'
        next_section_and_step: section_1:step_1
      set_language:
        content_blocks:
        - I'll communicate in your preferred language.
        counts_as_attempt: false
        next_section_and_step: introduction:welcome
      off_topic:
        content_blocks:
        - Let's get started helping River City become more sustainable! Are you ready?
        counts_as_attempt: false
        next_section_and_step: introduction:welcome
- section_id: section_1
  title: Transportation Challenge
  steps:
  - step_id: step_1
    title: Transportation Infrastructure
    content_blocks:
    - '## Challenge 1: Transportation Infrastructure 🚗🚌'
    - '**The Situation:**'
    - 'River City has severe traffic congestion. Most residents drive personal cars, creating:'
    - '- High carbon emissions'
    - '- Air pollution affecting public health'
    - '- Traffic jams wasting time and fuel'
    - ''
    - The city council has budget for ONE major transportation initiative.
    - ''
    - '**Your options:**'
    - '**A) Build more highways** - Reduce traffic jams, support car culture'
    - '**B) Expand public transit** - Buses and light rail, less convenient than cars but lower emissions per person'
    - '**C) Create bike lanes and pedestrian zones** - Healthiest and greenest option, but only works for shorter distances'
    - '**D) Mixed approach** - Smaller improvements to all three, but none will be as effective'
    question: Which transportation approach do you recommend? Explain your reasoning considering environmental impact, practicality, and long-term effects.
    tokens_for_ai: 'Evaluate their choice and reasoning.


      Sustainable choices in order: C (best), B (good), D (mixed), A (worst for environment)


      Categorize as:

      - sustainable_choice: Chooses B or C with environmental reasoning

      - mixed_thinking: Chooses D with awareness of tradeoffs

      - unsustainable: Chooses A (highways)

      - thoughtful_tradeoff: Any choice with sophisticated understanding of tradeoffs

      - limited_effort: Very brief or no reasoning

      - asking_clarifying_questions: Needs more information

      - off_topic: Unrelated

      '
    feedback_tokens_for_ai: 'Provide feedback on their environmental reasoning. If they chose highways, explain the

      concept of "induced demand" - more highways lead to more driving. If they chose sustainable

      options, praise their thinking and explain the benefits. Acknowledge legitimate concerns

      about practicality and economic impacts.

      '
    buckets:
    - sustainable_choice
    - mixed_thinking
    - unsustainable
    - thoughtful_tradeoff
    - limited_effort
    - asking_clarifying_questions
    - off_topic
    transitions:
      sustainable_choice:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Excellent environmental thinking! Explain the positive impacts of their choice on emissions, health, and urban livability.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+10
          carbon_reduced: high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_2:step_1
      mixed_thinking:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: A balanced approach can work! Discuss the tradeoffs and how to maximize environmental benefit within the mixed approach.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+5
          carbon_reduced: medium
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_2:step_1
      unsustainable:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Explain 'induced demand' - more highways lead to more driving and sprawl. Suggest how public transit or bike infrastructure could address congestion more sustainably.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n-5
          carbon_reduced: none
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_2:step_1
      thoughtful_tradeoff:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: You're thinking systemically about the tradeoffs! Validate their sophisticated reasoning and provide additional context.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+7
          carbon_reduced: medium
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_2:step_1
      limited_effort:
        content_blocks:
        - Please think more deeply about the environmental and practical implications of each option. What are the long-term effects?
        next_section_and_step: section_1:step_1
      asking_clarifying_questions:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Answer their question helpfully, providing information about emissions, costs, or practicality as requested.
        counts_as_attempt: false
        next_section_and_step: section_1:step_1
      off_topic:
        content_blocks:
        - Let's focus on the transportation challenge. Which option do you recommend and why?
        next_section_and_step: section_1:step_1
- section_id: section_2
  title: Energy Challenge
  steps:
  - step_id: step_1
    title: Energy Infrastructure
    content_blocks:
    - '## Challenge 2: Energy Infrastructure ⚡🌞'
    - '**The Situation:**'
    - 'River City''s power currently comes from:'
    - '- 70% coal (cheap but high carbon emissions and air pollution)'
    - '- 20% natural gas (cleaner than coal but still fossil fuel)'
    - '- 10% renewable (solar and wind)'
    - ''
    - The city wants to transition to cleaner energy. Budget allows for ONE major initiative.
    - ''
    - '**Your options:**'
    - '**A) Build large solar farm** - Clean energy, works great in sunny weather, needs battery storage for nighttime'
    - '**B) Invest in wind turbines** - Clean energy, works day and night if windy, some people find them unsightly'
    - '**C) Upgrade to natural gas** - Cleaner than coal, much lower cost than renewables, but still emits CO2'
    - '**D) Energy efficiency program** - Help residents insulate homes, use LED lights, efficient appliances - reduces total energy needed'
    question: Which energy strategy do you recommend? Consider climate impact, reliability, and cost.
    tokens_for_ai: 'Evaluate their choice and reasoning.


      Sustainability ranking: A or B (excellent), D (good), C (poor - still fossil fuel)


      Categorize as:

      - renewable_choice: Chooses A or B with climate reasoning

      - efficiency_focus: Chooses D understanding that reducing demand is also sustainable

      - transitional_thinking: Chooses C as a "bridge" fuel

      - systems_thinking: Shows understanding of energy grid complexity

      - limited_effort: Very brief

      - asking_clarifying_questions: Needs more info

      - off_topic: Unrelated

      '
    feedback_tokens_for_ai: 'Discuss their reasoning. If they chose renewables, explain benefits and acknowledge

      intermittency challenges. If they chose efficiency, praise reducing demand. If natural

      gas, acknowledge it''s cleaner than coal but emphasize it''s still fossil fuel and won''t

      meet long-term climate goals.

      '
    buckets:
    - renewable_choice
    - efficiency_focus
    - transitional_thinking
    - systems_thinking
    - limited_effort
    - asking_clarifying_questions
    - off_topic
    transitions:
      renewable_choice:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Excellent climate-conscious choice! Explain the long-term benefits of renewable energy for climate and air quality.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+10
          carbon_reduced: high
          renewable_energy: 'true'
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_3:step_1
      efficiency_focus:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Smart thinking! Reducing energy demand is one of the most cost-effective climate solutions. Explain how efficiency complements renewable energy.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+8
          carbon_reduced: medium-high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_3:step_1
      transitional_thinking:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Natural gas is cleaner than coal, but it's still a fossil fuel. Discuss the difference between a transitional step and a long-term solution for climate goals.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+3
          carbon_reduced: low
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_3:step_1
      systems_thinking:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Excellent systems thinking! Validate their sophisticated understanding and provide additional context on grid management.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+9
          carbon_reduced: high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_3:step_1
      limited_effort:
        content_blocks:
        - Please provide more reasoning about environmental impact and long-term sustainability. What are the climate implications?
        next_section_and_step: section_2:step_1
      asking_clarifying_questions:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Answer their question about renewable energy, costs, or technical details.
        counts_as_attempt: false
        next_section_and_step: section_2:step_1
      off_topic:
        content_blocks:
        - Let's focus on the energy challenge. Which energy strategy would you recommend?
        next_section_and_step: section_2:step_1
- section_id: section_3
  title: Land Use Challenge
  steps:
  - step_id: step_1
    title: Green Space vs Development
    content_blocks:
    - '## Challenge 3: Green Space vs Development 🌳🏢'
    - '**The Situation:**'
    - River City has a 50-acre plot of undeveloped land with mature forest and a wetland.
    - ''
    - '**Why the forest and wetland matter:**'
    - '- Trees absorb CO2 (carbon sink)'
    - '- Wetlands filter water and prevent flooding'
    - '- Habitat for dozens of bird species, amphibians, and small mammals'
    - '- Cool air and reduce urban heat island effect'
    - ''
    - The city faces pressure to develop this land.
    - ''
    - '**Your options:**'
    - '**A) Preserve as nature reserve** - Maximum environmental benefit, provides green space for residents, but no economic development'
    - '**B) Build affordable housing** - Addresses housing shortage, but removes habitat and green benefits'
    - '**C) Mixed-use development** - Preserve 30 acres as park, develop 20 acres with green building standards'
    - '**D) Commercial development** - Shopping center, brings jobs and tax revenue, full removal of natural area'
    question: What do you recommend for this land? Consider biodiversity, climate impact, and community needs.
    tokens_for_ai: 'Evaluate their reasoning about balancing conservation and development.


      Sustainability ranking: A (best for environment), C (good compromise), B (mixed), D (worst)


      Categorize as:

      - conservation_priority: Chooses A with ecological reasoning

      - balanced_approach: Chooses C recognizing need to balance multiple goals

      - housing_priority: Chooses B emphasizing social needs

      - development_focus: Chooses D

      - sophisticated_tradeoff: Any choice with nuanced understanding of competing values

      - limited_effort: Very brief

      - asking_clarifying_questions: Needs more info

      - off_topic: Unrelated

      '
    feedback_tokens_for_ai: 'Discuss ecosystem services the forest provides. If they chose preservation, explain the

      value of biodiversity and carbon sequestration. If mixed-use, validate the tradeoff thinking.

      If development, discuss the irreversibility of habitat loss and the concept of ecosystem services.

      '
    buckets:
    - conservation_priority
    - balanced_approach
    - housing_priority
    - development_focus
    - sophisticated_tradeoff
    - limited_effort
    - asking_clarifying_questions
    - off_topic
    transitions:
      conservation_priority:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Strong environmental reasoning! Explain the long-term value of ecosystem services and urban green space.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+10
          biodiversity_protected: high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_4:step_1
      balanced_approach:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Good systems thinking! You're balancing environmental protection with community needs. Discuss how to maximize environmental benefit in the developed portion.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+7
          biodiversity_protected: medium
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_4:step_1
      housing_priority:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Housing is indeed important! Explore whether there are alternative sites for housing that wouldn't destroy irreplaceable habitat. Discuss the value of ecosystem services.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+2
          biodiversity_protected: low
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_4:step_1
      development_focus:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: 'Commercial development provides economic benefits, but at the cost of irreplaceable ecosystem services. Discuss what''s lost: carbon storage, water filtration, biodiversity, flood control.'
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n-3
          biodiversity_protected: none
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_4:step_1
      sophisticated_tradeoff:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Excellent analysis of competing values! Validate their nuanced thinking about ecology, economics, and social needs.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+8
          biodiversity_protected: medium-high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_4:step_1
      limited_effort:
        content_blocks:
        - Think about what would be permanently lost if the natural area is developed. What ecosystem services does it provide?
        next_section_and_step: section_3:step_1
      asking_clarifying_questions:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Answer their question about ecosystem services, biodiversity, or development alternatives.
        counts_as_attempt: false
        next_section_and_step: section_3:step_1
      off_topic:
        content_blocks:
        - Let's focus on the land use decision. What would you recommend for the 50-acre natural area?
        next_section_and_step: section_3:step_1
- section_id: section_4
  title: Waste & Circular Economy
  steps:
  - step_id: step_1
    title: Waste Management
    content_blocks:
    - '## Challenge 4: Waste Management ♻️'
    - '**The Situation:**'
    - 'River City sends 80% of waste to landfills, where it:'
    - '- Takes up space (landfills filling up)'
    - '- Produces methane (a potent greenhouse gas)'
    - '- Wastes valuable materials'
    - ''
    - Only 20% is currently recycled.
    - ''
    - '**Understanding the circular economy:**'
    - Instead of 'take, make, dispose,' we can 'reduce, reuse, recycle' - keeping materials in use.
    - ''
    - '**Your options:**'
    - '**A) Mandatory recycling & composting** - Requires sorting, provides trucks, reduces landfill waste by ~50%'
    - '**B) Ban single-use plastics** - Eliminates major source of waste and ocean pollution'
    - '**C) Waste-to-energy incinerator** - Reduces landfill volume and generates electricity, but produces air emissions'
    - '**D) Producer responsibility laws** - Require manufacturers to take back and recycle their products'
    question: Which waste strategy would you implement? Consider environmental impact and systemic change.
    tokens_for_ai: 'Evaluate their understanding of circular economy and waste hierarchy.


      Sustainability ranking: A (good), B (good), D (excellent - addresses root cause), C (mixed - better than landfill but not ideal)


      Categorize as:

      - circular_economy: Chooses A or D with understanding of reuse/recycling

      - pollution_prevention: Chooses B to eliminate plastic waste

      - technical_solution: Chooses C (incineration)

      - systems_thinking: Shows understanding of upstream vs downstream solutions

      - limited_effort: Very brief

      - asking_clarifying_questions: Needs more info

      - off_topic: Unrelated

      '
    feedback_tokens_for_ai: 'Discuss the waste hierarchy: reduce > reuse > recycle > recover energy > landfill.

      If they chose producer responsibility, praise thinking about root causes. If recycling,

      good but also mention reducing consumption. If incineration, discuss why it''s better

      than landfill but not as good as preventing waste.

      '
    buckets:
    - circular_economy
    - pollution_prevention
    - technical_solution
    - systems_thinking
    - limited_effort
    - asking_clarifying_questions
    - off_topic
    transitions:
      circular_economy:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Excellent! You understand circular economy principles. Explain how keeping materials in use reduces resource extraction and emissions.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+8
          waste_reduction: high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_5:step_1
      pollution_prevention:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Great prevention thinking! Eliminating single-use plastics prevents pollution at the source. Discuss how this addresses ocean plastic crisis.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+9
          waste_reduction: high
          plastic_reduction: 'true'
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_5:step_1
      technical_solution:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Incineration is better than landfilling, but it's still treating symptoms rather than causes. Discuss the waste hierarchy and how prevention is better than end-of-pipe solutions.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+4
          waste_reduction: medium
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_5:step_1
      systems_thinking:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Excellent systems thinking! You're looking at root causes rather than just managing waste. Validate their sophisticated approach.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+10
          waste_reduction: high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: section_5:step_1
      limited_effort:
        content_blocks:
        - 'Think about the waste hierarchy: Is it better to prevent waste or manage it after it''s created?'
        next_section_and_step: section_4:step_1
      asking_clarifying_questions:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Answer their question about waste management, recycling, or circular economy concepts.
        counts_as_attempt: false
        next_section_and_step: section_4:step_1
      off_topic:
        content_blocks:
        - Let's focus on waste management. Which strategy would you recommend?
        next_section_and_step: section_4:step_1
- section_id: section_5
  title: Food & Agriculture
  steps:
  - step_id: step_1
    title: Sustainable Food Systems
    content_blocks:
    - '## Challenge 5: Sustainable Food Systems 🌾'
    - '**The Situation:**'
    - 'River City imports 90% of its food from distant farms, which:'
    - '- Requires energy for transportation (high carbon footprint)'
    - '- Makes city vulnerable to supply disruptions'
    - '- Disconnects residents from food sources'
    - ''
    - '**Environmental context:**'
    - Food systems account for ~25% of global greenhouse gas emissions
    - Agriculture uses 70% of freshwater globally
    - Industrial farming often depletes soil and harms biodiversity
    - ''
    - '**Your options:**'
    - '**A) Support local organic farms** - Lower transportation emissions, no pesticides, higher cost to consumers'
    - '**B) Urban farming program** - Rooftop gardens, community gardens, very local but limited scale'
    - '**C) Promote plant-based diets** - Meat production has 10-50x more emissions than plants, but culturally challenging'
    - '**D) Reduce food waste** - 30-40% of food is wasted; composting and redistribution can help'
    question: Which food sustainability strategy would you prioritize? Consider climate impact, feasibility, and food security.
    tokens_for_ai: 'Evaluate their understanding of food system environmental impacts.


      All options have merit! C (plant-based) has highest climate impact potential, D (waste reduction)

      is high-impact and feasible, A and B support local food systems.


      Categorize as:

      - climate_focused: Chooses C (plant-based) with emissions reasoning

      - waste_reduction: Chooses D understanding the scale of food waste

      - local_food: Chooses A or B for local benefits

      - holistic_thinking: Shows understanding of multiple interconnected issues

      - limited_effort: Very brief

      - asking_clarifying_questions: Needs more info

      - off_topic: Unrelated

      '
    feedback_tokens_for_ai: 'All choices have environmental merit! Validate their reasoning and provide context about

      the environmental impacts they''re addressing. Discuss connections between food, climate,

      biodiversity, and resource use.

      '
    buckets:
    - climate_focused
    - waste_reduction
    - local_food
    - holistic_thinking
    - limited_effort
    - asking_clarifying_questions
    - off_topic
    transitions:
      climate_focused:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: You've identified one of the highest-impact climate solutions! Explain why animal agriculture has such large emissions, while acknowledging cultural and practical challenges.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+10
          carbon_reduced: very-high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: conclusion:step_1
      waste_reduction:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: 'Excellent choice! Food waste is a massive but often overlooked problem. Explain the triple benefit: less production needed, less methane from landfills, food reaches hungry people.'
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+9
          waste_reduction: high
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: conclusion:step_1
      local_food:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Good thinking about local food systems! Explain benefits for local economy, food security, and reducing transportation emissions. Note that production methods matter more than distance for some foods.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+7
          local_food: 'true'
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: conclusion:step_1
      holistic_thinking:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Excellent holistic understanding of food system sustainability! Validate their sophisticated systems thinking about multiple interconnected issues.
        metadata_add:
          environmental_score: n+10
          decisions_made: n+1
        next_section_and_step: conclusion:step_1
      limited_effort:
        content_blocks:
        - 'Think about the full lifecycle of food: production, transportation, consumption, and waste. Where are the biggest environmental impacts?'
        next_section_and_step: section_5:step_1
      asking_clarifying_questions:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Answer their question about food system environmental impacts, emissions, or sustainability strategies.
        counts_as_attempt: false
        next_section_and_step: section_5:step_1
      off_topic:
        content_blocks:
        - Let's focus on food sustainability. Which strategy would you recommend?
        next_section_and_step: section_5:step_1
- section_id: conclusion
  title: Sustainability Report
  steps:
  - step_id: step_1
    title: Congratulations!
    content_blocks:
    - '## Congratulations, Environmental Consultant! 🌍'
    - You've completed your sustainability consulting project for River City!
    - ''
    - '**Key environmental concepts you explored:**'
    - ✓ Carbon footprint and climate impact
    - ✓ Renewable vs fossil fuel energy
    - ✓ Ecosystem services and biodiversity
    - ✓ Circular economy and waste hierarchy
    - ✓ Sustainable food systems
    - ✓ Systems thinking and tradeoffs
    - ''
    - '**Why sustainability matters:**'
    - 'Human wellbeing depends on healthy ecosystems - they provide:'
    - '- Clean air and water'
    - '- Climate regulation'
    - '- Food and materials'
    - '- Recreation and beauty'
    - ''
    - '**The challenge:**'
    - We must meet human needs while protecting the Earth's systems that support all life.
    - ''
    - '**What you learned:**'
    - '- Environmental problems are interconnected (systems thinking)'
    - '- Choices have both immediate and long-term consequences'
    - '- Prevention is better than treating symptoms'
    - '- We can balance environmental protection with human needs through thoughtful design'
    question: Reflecting on your decisions, what's one action you could take in your own life to reduce your environmental impact? What sustainability principle resonated most with you?
    tokens_for_ai: 'This is a reflection question. Accept any thoughtful response about personal application

      of sustainability principles.


      Categorize as:

      - specific_commitment: Identifies concrete action they plan to take

      - thoughtful_reflection: Meaningful reflection on what they learned

      - basic_reflection: Brief but genuine

      - limited_effort: Very brief

      - off_topic: Unrelated

      '
    feedback_tokens_for_ai: 'Provide personalized, encouraging feedback. Acknowledge the environmental decisions they

      made throughout the activity. Emphasize that individual actions matter AND we need systemic

      change. Encourage them to think about sustainability in their daily choices and to advocate

      for environmental protection in their communities.

      '
    buckets:
    - specific_commitment
    - thoughtful_reflection
    - basic_reflection
    - limited_effort
    - off_topic
    transitions:
      specific_commitment:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Wonderful! Your specific commitment shows you're ready to apply what you learned. Encourage and support their action plan. Remind them that individual actions AND systemic advocacy both matter.
        metadata_add:
          activity_completed: 'true'
      thoughtful_reflection:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Excellent reflection on sustainability principles! Provide encouragement and suggest ways to apply these concepts in daily life.
        metadata_add:
          activity_completed: 'true'
      basic_reflection:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Thank them for engaging with environmental challenges. Summarize key takeaways and encourage sustainable thinking.
        metadata_add:
          activity_completed: 'true'
      limited_effort:
        ai_feedback:
          tokens_for_ai: Acknowledge their completion and encourage them to consider environmental impacts in their daily decisions.
        metadata_add:
          activity_completed: 'true'
      off_topic:
        content_blocks:
        - Let's reflect on sustainability. What action could you take personally to reduce environmental impact?
        next_section_and_step: conclusion:step_1