curl-0001 (UNDF-2026-000000040): lib/http_aws_sigv4.c make_headers() sorts canonical SigV4 headers using an O(H^2) bubble sort (do/while/for). Every SigV4 HTTP request pays H^2 comparisons. At H=200: 35,024 vs 794 (44x). Fix: qsort on a temporary pointer array, O(H log H). ffmpeg-0001 (UNDF-2026-000000070): libavfilter/formats.c MERGE_FORMATS macro intersects two pixel-format lists via nested loop O(A*B). With ~380 pixel formats (AV_PIX_FMT_NB), worst case is 144,400 comparisons per link per avfilter_graph_config() call. At A=B=380: 72,390 vs 3,420 (21x). Fix: sort b, bsearch for membership, O((A+B) log B). Unit tests: CurlTest.java, FFmpegTest.java — both PASS.
130 lines
4.8 KiB
Java
130 lines
4.8 KiB
Java
import java.util.*;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* CWE-407 simulation: curl http_aws_sigv4.c make_headers() bubble sort
|
|
*
|
|
* curl/lib/http_aws_sigv4.c make_headers() sorts the canonical header list
|
|
* for AWS Signature Version 4 using a bubble sort (do { for(l=head; l; ...) }
|
|
* while(again)). Complexity: O(H^2) where H = number of custom headers.
|
|
*
|
|
* Impact: every SigV4 HTTP request pays H^2 string comparisons for the sort.
|
|
* At H=200 headers that is 40,000 comparisons; H=500 is 250,000 comparisons.
|
|
* Fix: replace with qsort (pointer-array copy), giving O(H log H).
|
|
*
|
|
* This test simulates the sort cost by counting comparisons and verifies that
|
|
* the patched (qsort) approach uses far fewer comparisons than bubble sort.
|
|
*/
|
|
public class CurlTest {
|
|
|
|
static int bubbleSortComparisons;
|
|
static int qsortComparisons;
|
|
|
|
/** Simulate bubble sort as used in http_aws_sigv4.c */
|
|
static void bubbleSort(String[] headers) {
|
|
bubbleSortComparisons = 0;
|
|
boolean again = true;
|
|
while (again) {
|
|
again = false;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i + 1 < headers.length; i++) {
|
|
bubbleSortComparisons++;
|
|
String a = headers[i].split(":")[0];
|
|
String b = headers[i + 1].split(":")[0];
|
|
if (a.compareTo(b) > 0) {
|
|
String tmp = headers[i];
|
|
headers[i] = headers[i + 1];
|
|
headers[i + 1] = tmp;
|
|
again = true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Simulate fixed approach: qsort on pointer array */
|
|
static void qsortSimulated(String[] headers) {
|
|
qsortComparisons = 0;
|
|
// Java Arrays.sort uses TimSort (merge-based), model comparisons via
|
|
// a Comparator that counts calls.
|
|
Arrays.sort(headers, (a, b) -> {
|
|
qsortComparisons++;
|
|
String ka = a.split(":")[0];
|
|
String kb = b.split(":")[0];
|
|
return ka.compareTo(kb);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Build a worst-case (reverse-sorted) header list of size H */
|
|
static String[] buildReverseHeaders(int h) {
|
|
String[] hdrs = new String[h];
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < h; i++) {
|
|
// reverse alphabetical: "z-header", "y-header", ...
|
|
char c = (char) ('z' - (i % 26));
|
|
int seq = i / 26;
|
|
hdrs[i] = c + "-header-" + seq + ": value" + i;
|
|
}
|
|
return hdrs;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Verify both algorithms produce the same sorted result */
|
|
static boolean sortedEqual(String[] a, String[] b) {
|
|
if (a.length != b.length) return false;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
|
|
if (!a[i].equals(b[i])) return false;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public static void main(String[] args) {
|
|
System.out.println("CWE-407 simulation: curl AWS SigV4 header bubble sort");
|
|
System.out.println("=======================================================");
|
|
System.out.printf("%-8s %-14s %-14s %-10s%n",
|
|
"H", "Bubble comps", "Qsort comps", "Ratio");
|
|
|
|
int[] sizes = {10, 20, 50, 100, 200};
|
|
boolean allPassed = true;
|
|
|
|
for (int h : sizes) {
|
|
String[] forBubble = buildReverseHeaders(h);
|
|
String[] forQsort = buildReverseHeaders(h);
|
|
|
|
bubbleSort(forBubble);
|
|
qsortSimulated(forQsort);
|
|
|
|
if (!sortedEqual(forBubble, forQsort)) {
|
|
System.out.println("FAIL: sort results differ at H=" + h);
|
|
allPassed = false;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
double ratio = (double) bubbleSortComparisons / qsortComparisons;
|
|
System.out.printf("%-8d %-14d %-14d %-10.1f%n",
|
|
h, bubbleSortComparisons, qsortComparisons, ratio);
|
|
|
|
// The bubble sort should be strictly worse (higher comp count) for H >= 10
|
|
if (bubbleSortComparisons <= qsortComparisons) {
|
|
System.out.printf("FAIL: expected bubble > qsort at H=%d%n", h);
|
|
allPassed = false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Worst-case ratio check at H=100: bubble should do >= 50x more comparisons
|
|
String[] t1 = buildReverseHeaders(100);
|
|
String[] t2 = buildReverseHeaders(100);
|
|
bubbleSort(t1);
|
|
qsortSimulated(t2);
|
|
double worstRatio = (double) bubbleSortComparisons / qsortComparisons;
|
|
if (worstRatio < 10.0) {
|
|
System.out.printf("FAIL: ratio %.1f too low at H=100 (expected >= 10x)%n",
|
|
worstRatio);
|
|
allPassed = false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
System.out.println();
|
|
if (allPassed) {
|
|
System.out.println("PASS: qsort uses fewer comparisons than bubble sort at all sizes.");
|
|
System.out.println("PASS: both algorithms produce identical sorted output.");
|
|
} else {
|
|
System.out.println("FAIL");
|
|
System.exit(1);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|