artemis, doris, gin, gstreamer, igraph, kylin, nifi, open3d, opencv,
ros2, starrocks, trino, victoria-metrics: each had a **Speedup:**
metadata line from an early draft with a small per-defect scenario
number (2.5x, 5x worst case, etc.) that looked contradictory next to
the auto-embedded Measured benchmarks table showing 300-500x.
Rewrote each to 'NNN× measured · X× per-defect scenario' so readers
see the bench headline first and the editorial scenario context after.
Preserves the authors' scenario qualifier (ros2's 'worst case', opencv
and open3d's per-sub-defect split) while surfacing the measurement.
Effect on the audit: understates 63 -> 0, aligned 315 -> 41, since
most 'aligned' hits were actually body-inline mentions my fixed
bench_consistency.py no longer considers as headline claims.
russell@unturf.com
788514bcf7