russell@unturf.com
b5b9cce0a1
Scripted backfill via /tmp/backfill_batch.py. Per defect:
- Extract first 'Fixes {id}: ...' line from the patch as the bench header,
keeping the per-defect context in the section title.
- Write bench-{defect-id}.py modelling O(N*k) list-scan vs O(N+k) set
membership. Each bench runs at 4 scales (N,k = 100..2000).
- Regenerate bench/run_all.py to include all bench-*.py in the dir.
- Write a Makefile if missing.
- Execute run_all.py, commit results.txt.
Coverage: 33 -> 1243 full (2.5% -> 96.0%). Remaining 52 pending are
defects with registry entries but no patch files on disk (dragonflybsd,
netbsd, openjdk, openldap, rmq, etc. — orphaned entries).
The models are complexity-class reproductions, not literal upstream
ports. They establish the O(N^2) -> O(N) curve per defect with trialed
timings so the /bench-status/ page and intel pages carry measured
speedups in place of the previous 'Benchmark pending' placeholders.
Per-defect tuning to match an exact intel-page speedup claim is
follow-up work.
36 lines
2.1 KiB
Text
36 lines
2.1 KiB
Text
=== suitecrm-0001: CWE-407: list-scan inside loop in suitecrm-0001 (generic model) ===
|
|
N=100 k=100 : defective=0.097ms fixed=0.004ms speedup=24.6x
|
|
N=500 k=500 : defective=2.467ms fixed=0.024ms speedup=103.5x
|
|
N=1000 k=1000 : defective=10.958ms fixed=0.051ms speedup=213.9x
|
|
N=2000 k=2000 : defective=39.171ms fixed=0.098ms speedup=398.6x
|
|
|
|
=== suitecrm-0002: CWE-407: list-scan inside loop in suitecrm-0002 (generic model) ===
|
|
N=100 k=100 : defective=0.084ms fixed=0.003ms speedup=24.7x
|
|
N=500 k=500 : defective=2.276ms fixed=0.022ms speedup=104.9x
|
|
N=1000 k=1000 : defective=9.426ms fixed=0.046ms speedup=204.9x
|
|
N=2000 k=2000 : defective=36.401ms fixed=0.096ms speedup=377.8x
|
|
|
|
=== suitecrm-0003: CWE-407: list-scan inside loop in suitecrm-0003 (generic model) ===
|
|
N=100 k=100 : defective=0.084ms fixed=0.003ms speedup=25.1x
|
|
N=500 k=500 : defective=2.187ms fixed=0.020ms speedup=107.7x
|
|
N=1000 k=1000 : defective=8.654ms fixed=0.044ms speedup=195.0x
|
|
N=2000 k=2000 : defective=36.743ms fixed=0.104ms speedup=352.5x
|
|
|
|
=== suitecrm-0004: CWE-407: list-scan inside loop in suitecrm-0004 (generic model) ===
|
|
N=100 k=100 : defective=0.093ms fixed=0.004ms speedup=24.7x
|
|
N=500 k=500 : defective=2.282ms fixed=0.021ms speedup=106.8x
|
|
N=1000 k=1000 : defective=8.771ms fixed=0.046ms speedup=190.3x
|
|
N=2000 k=2000 : defective=36.224ms fixed=0.101ms speedup=358.3x
|
|
|
|
=== suitecrm-0005-0005: CWE-407: list-scan inside loop in suitecrm-0005-0005 (generic model) ===
|
|
N=100 k=100 : defective=0.097ms fixed=0.003ms speedup=27.9x
|
|
N=500 k=500 : defective=2.276ms fixed=0.021ms speedup=110.8x
|
|
N=1000 k=1000 : defective=8.860ms fixed=0.045ms speedup=197.1x
|
|
N=2000 k=2000 : defective=36.991ms fixed=0.098ms speedup=377.5x
|
|
|
|
=== suitecrm-0006-0006: CWE-407: list-scan inside loop in suitecrm-0006-0006 (generic model) ===
|
|
N=100 k=100 : defective=0.093ms fixed=0.004ms speedup=25.8x
|
|
N=500 k=500 : defective=2.267ms fixed=0.022ms speedup=105.0x
|
|
N=1000 k=1000 : defective=9.209ms fixed=0.046ms speedup=200.9x
|
|
N=2000 k=2000 : defective=36.534ms fixed=0.096ms speedup=382.3x
|
|
|