Lands aborist/qa/model_profiles.py with two profiles:
- adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic
tight caps for broad intensities (ALL=8, COMPREHENSIVE=5,
OPEN_REQUEST=5) reflecting the 2026-05-02 runaway case.
- default
large-reasoner-class fallback (ALL=12, COMPREHENSIVE=15,
OPEN_REQUEST=12). Used when model_profile_id has no entry.
cap_for_intensity() resolves caps via three-source chain:
1. policy_overrides (per-call dict, highest priority)
2. per-model profile from PROFILES
3. "default" profile fallback
EXPLICIT_COUNT sentinel handles SMALL_NUM_EXPLICIT and
COMPARATIVE_BOUND — cap is the question's explicit count, not a
profile-set value. Defensive fallback to MANY cap if classifier
fired the rung without extracting a count.
Four new policy fields, all folded into governance_policy_hash via
_VERIFIER_POLICY_FIELDS:
- quantifier_guard_enabled master kill (default True)
- quantifier_guard_apply_caps dry-run gate (default False per
§10.11.3 — cap LOOKED UP and reported
on result, but NOT applied to the
verifier until operator flips True)
- quantifier_caps_by_intensity per-call override dict
- quantifier_guard_modes per-mode opt-in list (default
["claim_lattice_pointer",
"claim_lattice"]; quote opts out)
Six-level disable hierarchy (§10.11.2) implemented:
- Per-test: policy={"quantifier_guard_enabled": False}
- Per-call: --no-quantifier-guard (Phase 4)
- Per-phase: each policy switch is independent
- Per-mode: quantifier_guard_modes filter
- Per-model: model_profiles.py lookup
- Master: governance_policy_hash invalidation on flip
Wired through both query() and runner.ask() — both compute
effective_max_claims from the (classifier_intensity, model_profile,
policy_overrides) triple and pass it as max_claims_per_answer to
the verifier. Dry-run mode keeps effective_max_claims at the policy
default (12) until apply_caps flips True.
Result dict surfaces claim_cap_applied (the LOOKED-UP cap, even in
dry-run) plus all Phase-1 quantifier fields on miss-path AND
cache-hit path so bench rows stay column-aligned.
19 new tests pin: per-model selection, EXPLICIT_COUNT sentinel,
override precedence, governance-hash invalidation on every cap
field, profile shape (all ten rungs covered), default profile
presence.
221 lines
8.1 KiB
Python
221 lines
8.1 KiB
Python
"""Quantifier cap table + governance hash + dry-run discipline.
|
|
|
|
Ticket #000008 Phase 2: per-model cap profiles
|
|
(``aborist/qa/model_profiles.py``) and the four policy fields that
|
|
gate cap behavior:
|
|
|
|
- ``quantifier_guard_enabled`` — master kill
|
|
- ``quantifier_guard_apply_caps`` — dry-run gate (default False)
|
|
- ``quantifier_caps_by_intensity`` — per-call override dict
|
|
- ``quantifier_guard_modes`` — per-mode opt-in list
|
|
|
|
Tests pin:
|
|
1. Per-model cap selection (Hermes profile vs default fallback).
|
|
2. EXPLICIT_COUNT sentinel — SMALL_NUM_EXPLICIT respects the
|
|
question's count.
|
|
3. Policy override beats per-model profile.
|
|
4. Governance-hash invalidation on every cap-related field flip.
|
|
5. Six-level disable hierarchy (master, dry-run, per-mode,
|
|
per-call override).
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from aborist.qa.keys import _VERIFIER_POLICY_FIELDS, verifier_policy_hash
|
|
from aborist.qa.model_profiles import (
|
|
EXPLICIT_COUNT,
|
|
PROFILES,
|
|
cap_for_intensity,
|
|
profile_id_present,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- profile lookup
|
|
|
|
def test_hermes_fp8_profile_present():
|
|
"""The Hermes-3-FP8 endpoint profile must exist verbatim — the
|
|
string is what the bench harness sends as ``model_profile_id``."""
|
|
assert profile_id_present("adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_default_profile_fallback():
|
|
"""Unknown model ids fall through to the ``default`` profile."""
|
|
assert not profile_id_present("some-future-model-v2")
|
|
cap = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id="some-future-model-v2",
|
|
intensity="ALL",
|
|
)
|
|
# Default profile sets ALL = 12.
|
|
assert cap == 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_hermes_caps_are_tighter_than_default():
|
|
"""Hermes broad-quantifier caps must be tighter than the default
|
|
profile — that's the whole point of the per-model split. Pin the
|
|
relationship so a future profile edit can't accidentally loosen
|
|
Hermes back to default."""
|
|
hermes_id = "adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic"
|
|
for intensity in ("ALL", "COMPREHENSIVE", "OPEN_REQUEST", "MANY"):
|
|
hermes_cap = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id=hermes_id, intensity=intensity,
|
|
)
|
|
default_cap = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id="unknown", intensity=intensity,
|
|
)
|
|
assert hermes_cap is not None
|
|
assert default_cap is not None
|
|
assert hermes_cap <= default_cap, (
|
|
f"Hermes {intensity} cap ({hermes_cap}) must not exceed "
|
|
f"default cap ({default_cap})"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- EXPLICIT_COUNT
|
|
|
|
def test_explicit_count_resolves_from_question_count():
|
|
"""SMALL_NUM_EXPLICIT cap = the explicit count from the question."""
|
|
cap = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id="adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic",
|
|
intensity="SMALL_NUM_EXPLICIT",
|
|
explicit_count=3,
|
|
)
|
|
assert cap == 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_explicit_count_falls_back_when_missing():
|
|
"""If the classifier reported SMALL_NUM_EXPLICIT but didn't
|
|
extract a count (defensive — shouldn't happen), fall back to the
|
|
profile's MANY cap rather than crash."""
|
|
cap = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id="adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic",
|
|
intensity="SMALL_NUM_EXPLICIT",
|
|
explicit_count=None,
|
|
)
|
|
# Hermes MANY = 8.
|
|
assert cap == 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_comparative_bound_uses_explicit_count():
|
|
"""COMPARATIVE_BOUND also reads explicit_count (the upper bound
|
|
extracted by the classifier — for `between A and B` the upper)."""
|
|
cap = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id="adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic",
|
|
intensity="COMPARATIVE_BOUND",
|
|
explicit_count=7,
|
|
)
|
|
assert cap == 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- override
|
|
|
|
def test_policy_override_beats_per_model_profile():
|
|
"""A per-call ``quantifier_caps_by_intensity`` dict wins over the
|
|
profile table. Lets an operator override caps without editing
|
|
model_profiles.py."""
|
|
cap = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id="adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic",
|
|
intensity="ALL",
|
|
policy_overrides={"ALL": 4},
|
|
)
|
|
assert cap == 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_policy_override_partial_falls_back_to_profile():
|
|
"""An override dict with one intensity doesn't suppress the
|
|
others — the profile still answers for unspecified intensities."""
|
|
cap_all = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id="adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic",
|
|
intensity="ALL",
|
|
policy_overrides={"COMPREHENSIVE": 3}, # only COMPREHENSIVE overridden
|
|
)
|
|
# ALL still pulls from Hermes profile (8).
|
|
assert cap_all == 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_unknown_intensity_returns_none():
|
|
"""Caller should treat None as 'no cap; use the policy default'."""
|
|
cap = cap_for_intensity(
|
|
model_profile_id="adamo1139/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-8B-FP8-Dynamic",
|
|
intensity="MADE_UP_INTENSITY",
|
|
)
|
|
assert cap is None
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- governance hash
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize("field", [
|
|
"quantifier_guard_enabled",
|
|
"quantifier_guard_apply_caps",
|
|
"quantifier_caps_by_intensity",
|
|
"quantifier_guard_modes",
|
|
])
|
|
def test_each_quantifier_field_is_in_verifier_policy_fields(field):
|
|
"""All four Phase-2 policy fields must be in
|
|
``_VERIFIER_POLICY_FIELDS`` so flipping any of them invalidates
|
|
prior cache records on lookup. Without this binding, an operator
|
|
could change caps and silently re-use stale cached verdicts."""
|
|
assert field in _VERIFIER_POLICY_FIELDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_governance_hash_changes_when_apply_caps_flips():
|
|
"""Dry-run → cap-on flip MUST bump governance_policy_hash. Same
|
|
classifier output, different verifier behavior — distinct
|
|
cache_key per §10.11.2 Level 6."""
|
|
base_policy = dict.fromkeys(_VERIFIER_POLICY_FIELDS, "default")
|
|
base_policy["quantifier_guard_apply_caps"] = False
|
|
h_dry = verifier_policy_hash(base_policy)
|
|
base_policy["quantifier_guard_apply_caps"] = True
|
|
h_apply = verifier_policy_hash(base_policy)
|
|
assert h_dry != h_apply
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_governance_hash_changes_when_caps_dict_changes():
|
|
"""Editing the per-call override dict must bump the hash too."""
|
|
base_policy = dict.fromkeys(_VERIFIER_POLICY_FIELDS, "default")
|
|
base_policy["quantifier_caps_by_intensity"] = {}
|
|
h_empty = verifier_policy_hash(base_policy)
|
|
base_policy["quantifier_caps_by_intensity"] = {"ALL": 4}
|
|
h_override = verifier_policy_hash(base_policy)
|
|
assert h_empty != h_override
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_governance_hash_changes_when_master_switch_flips():
|
|
base_policy = dict.fromkeys(_VERIFIER_POLICY_FIELDS, "default")
|
|
base_policy["quantifier_guard_enabled"] = True
|
|
h_on = verifier_policy_hash(base_policy)
|
|
base_policy["quantifier_guard_enabled"] = False
|
|
h_off = verifier_policy_hash(base_policy)
|
|
assert h_on != h_off
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_governance_hash_changes_when_mode_list_changes():
|
|
base_policy = dict.fromkeys(_VERIFIER_POLICY_FIELDS, "default")
|
|
base_policy["quantifier_guard_modes"] = ["claim_lattice_pointer", "claim_lattice"]
|
|
h_default = verifier_policy_hash(base_policy)
|
|
base_policy["quantifier_guard_modes"] = ["claim_lattice_pointer"]
|
|
h_pointer_only = verifier_policy_hash(base_policy)
|
|
assert h_default != h_pointer_only
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------- profile shape
|
|
|
|
def test_profile_keys_include_all_ten_rungs():
|
|
"""Every profile must cover all ten intensity rungs so cap
|
|
lookup can't fall through to the default profile due to a
|
|
missing key."""
|
|
expected_rungs = {
|
|
"ABSENT", "SINGULAR", "PROPORTIONAL",
|
|
"SMALL_NUM_EXPLICIT", "COMPARATIVE_BOUND",
|
|
"FEW", "MANY", "ALL", "COMPREHENSIVE", "OPEN_REQUEST",
|
|
}
|
|
for profile_id, profile in PROFILES.items():
|
|
missing = expected_rungs - set(profile.keys())
|
|
assert not missing, f"{profile_id} missing rungs: {missing}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_default_profile_present():
|
|
"""Lookup-fallback target must exist or unknown models would
|
|
return None on every call."""
|
|
assert "default" in PROFILES
|