Tried a single-clause-containment check on the paraphrase path (and
the entity path's weakest slot): a span is grounded only if a single
source clause (;/. -delimited) covers >= paraphrase_coverage of its
content tokens — a recombination spreads them across clauses. On the
contrived fixtures it works (hard-003 Mercury, hard-005 Einstein →
UNGROUNDED → falsification-hard 10/12 → 12/12). But it ALSO rejects
legitimate cross-sentence summaries — the established fox-2026-04-29
Batman case ("Batman, who is the alias of Bruce Wayne, lives in
Gotham City." against "Batman is the alias of Bruce Wayne. Batman
lives in Gotham City.": spans two clauses, best clause covers 4/6 =
0.67 → demoted, but it's a correct paraphrase). And there's no
threshold that separates the two directions — the recombination
("Mercury …": best clause covers 4/5 = 0.8) sits ABOVE the legit
summary's 0.67, so any cut that rejects Mercury also rejects Batman.
Distinguishing "recombined into a different statement" from
"summarized two adjacent sentences" needs attribution / dependency
parsing or a mini-NLI model (the §2.3 territory), not a conservative
lexical proxy.
Reverted — verify.py stays at its post-step-2.4 state; falsification-
hard stays at 10/12 with hard-003 + hard-005 as documented residue.
#000048 §5 records the attempt + the no-threshold-separates argument;
recommendation: close#000048 at 2.1+2.4 (12 of 16 residual items
closed), with the 2 recombination fixtures a marker for a future
attribution-aware verifier (its own ticket). Awaiting fox's call.
Doc-only — no code change in this commit.
russell@unturf.com
f6ac72270c