Three new question-shape classes dispatched through warrant_check
alongside the existing relation + date anchors:
(1) Entity-list shape — `name X`, `list X`, `who are the members
of X`. List-aware extractor `extract_entity_list_anchors`
(multi-word phrases ∪ solo-cap individual names) so comma-
separated entities each contribute. ANY-match semantics:
demote-don't-reject when an extra entity from training-prior
appears alongside grounded ones.
(2) Count shape — `how many X`, `how much X`. Digit ↔ word
equivalence (claim says "six", span says "6", or vice versa)
with ordinal collapse (`sixth → 6`). Year-shaped digits
filter out (those belong to the existing date anchor class).
ALL-match semantics: every count token in the claim must
appear in some cited span as digit or word.
(3) Why-cause shape — `why X`. Cause-anchor pool widens to
≥5-char lowercase common nouns (post a generic stopword set
that filters quantifier-adjective fillers like "various",
"factors", "situation") PLUS proper-noun anchors from the
existing extractor. Gated on why-shape only: lowercase
common-noun extraction has higher false-positive risk
elsewhere.
Per-class policy gate (proposed `claim_lattice_warrant_classes`
dict) deferred per the five-step algorithm step 2: single
`warrant_check_enabled: bool` is the minimum viable gate; per-
class flags earn their slot when bench evidence shows over-firing
on a specific class.
17 new warrant tests (detector + extractor + integration).
Marker test in test_directives.py flipped from "absent" to
"present" assertion: test_d6_warrant_generalization_landed.
Full suite: 709 passed (was 692, +17).
Directive D6 status flipped to ✓ in seven-point-program.md.
Ticket #000003 closed.
russell@unturf.com
f419d76292