russell@unturf.com
a66ab10351
Captures design for an action-provenance DAG layer downstream of final_label - five new stages (action_plan -> tool_call -> tool_output -> postcondition_check -> action_label) - and why this stays a research doc rather than an open ticket today. Three options analyzed: Option A in-tree action DAG (identity drift), Option B sidecar package (recommended; preserves the verified-answer-cache identity by chaining a separate action_root that cross-links into run_dag_root), Option C out-of-scope. Promotion criteria spelled out so the doc graduates to a ticket when the first agent use case shows up. Cross-links #000001 (upstream provenance gap), #000022 (LossReport, same axiom one stage upstream), #000012 (v8 selection could later score action histories), and the 2026-05-07 arborist-vs-donto comparison. TICKETS.md gains a pointer in "Distinction from other docs" so future shifts find the doc. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| _source | ||
| diagrams | ||
| tickets | ||
| bench-maxing.md | ||
| benchmarks.md | ||
| cti-architecture.md | ||
| mesh.md | ||
| pi-star-composition.md | ||
| qa-modes-bench.md | ||
| seven-point-program.md | ||
| spec-methodology.md | ||
| TICKETS.md | ||
| tool-action-dag-design.md | ||