Per fox 2026-06-01: replace the descriptive review-archaeology
structure with what we SHOULD grow. Ticket goes from 805 lines
(original §§1-8 design log + my dav1d-review §0 retrofit) to
389 lines of clean directive spec.
What changed in shape:
Before: §0 "Dav1d review verdict" decision-table + §§1-8
archaeology of the original Joseph6 spec being rejected.
After: §1-12 forward spec. Goal at the top, hard constraints,
composite ChainRoot identity, five bridge outcomes with
typed witness shapes, privacy class vocabulary, Phase 1
deliverables, Phase 2/3/4 roadmap, retro-validation
appendix, cross-references, three remaining open
questions, five-step alignment, one-line review history
at the bottom pointing at the archive file.
What changed in content: nothing material. The corrected spec from
the prior §0 retrofit IS the body now. The original Joseph6 design
log is no longer inlined — git history preserves it at commit
fadc50a; readers who want the rejection-by-rejection detail go to
docs/dav1d-reviews/000071-world-bridge-grammar--2026-06-01.txt.
TICKETS.md index row also rewritten in directive voice. Shorter,
less "what was wrong" + more "what to build."
Net effect: an implementer picking this up reads a forward-looking
ticket they can act on, not an archaeology of which framing was
rejected. The dav1d review history is one line at the bottom, not
the structural frame.
doc_counts tests still pass.
russell@unturf.com
9e4645f60e