Synthesizes the bench-maxing work across:
#000049 NLI recombination veto (bart-large-mnli/k=12/margin/θ=0.999
→ 48% real-haystack recall at 0/808 STRICT FP — partial closure,
Phase-3 semantic candidate selector for full closure)
#000052 §3.1 diagnose_coherence (lexical sidecar, advisory-only,
1.1% real-STRICT FP after round-2 patch)
#000052 §3.2 relevance reranker (bge-reranker-large + cleaned +
θ ≤ -2.42 → 100% mis-cite / 55% deflection / 0% STRICT FP —
motivating Zionist-shape failure fully covered)
The three are architecturally orthogonal (§3.2.2 step 3C verified:
combining lexical sidecars with the relevance reranker gives no
lift; each owns its own failure-shape slice). Three structurally
distinct demote-only signals layered on the binary verifier.
Three runtime-promotion decisions for fox+dav1d:
- §3.1: keep advisory or wire policy hook? (probably advisory)
- §3.2: promote at the fp=0 operating point? (sign-off folds
relevance_policy_hash into governance_policy_hash)
- #000049: promote at 48% partial closure, or wait for Phase 3
semantic candidate selector?
Bench-maxing methodology codified in CLAUDE.md is the transferable
artifact: 'clean candidate-bench can mis-predict in BOTH directions
— real-data fixtures on both precision AND recall axes are the
only load-bearing measurement'. Eight instances across the two
arcs; the discipline applies to any future model-based addition.
Indexed in docs/TICKETS.md 'Distinction from other docs' section as
a non-ticket reference doc. Production verifier unchanged; nothing
in audit_mode; all work SHADOW pending sign-off.
russell@unturf.com
90d5c54c0a