From 39f8aa1fb4b75ae60346521a237cba6f4a57fc7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "russell@unturf.com" Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 18:00:14 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] docs: fix pager duplicate-object + v8 short title underlines - '.. class:: center' parsed as a Python class named 'center' (duplicate across one-pager + two-pager) -> '.. rst-class:: center' (styling, no object). Clears the duplicate-object-description warnings. - two v8-consensus section underlines were shorter than their titles ('underline too short') -> extended to title length. Pager + v8 pages now build with zero warnings. --- docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst | 2 +- docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst | 4 ++-- docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst b/docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst index 22aa316..f9fe7c1 100644 --- a/docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst +++ b/docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ arborist — answers your AI can prove ===================================== -.. class:: center +.. rst-class:: center *one-page summary · permacomputer.com · AGPL-3.0* diff --git a/docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst b/docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst index 8bb0605..7952910 100644 --- a/docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst +++ b/docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst @@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ .. One which is durable, easy to repair, & distributed like tap water .. for machine learning intelligence. -.. class:: center +.. rst-class:: center **Unturf · permacomputer.com · uncloseai.com · unfirehose.com** arborist — Merkle-Providence Reverse RAG, reference implementation ==================================================================== -.. class:: center +.. rst-class:: center **License: AGPL-3.0-only** · 2026-05-14 · *Russell Ballestrini * diff --git a/docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst b/docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst index 67e7700..46f3e55 100644 --- a/docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst +++ b/docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ frontiers. That procedure is **single-validator regression testing with a Merkle receipt**. It is not consensus. §1.2 The selection gap under v7 § 13.4 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The unaddressed gaps from v7 § 13.4, each with a concrete failure under the current spec: @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ metaphor — a single lab signing its own upgrades, no different in trust model from current model-card releases. §1.3 Concrete attack scenario (motivating example) -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lab A trains ``M_t → M_{t+1}`` with a backdoor that triggers on a rare input pattern. Lab A signs Proof-of-Upgrade: ε-coverage