diff --git a/docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst b/docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst index 22aa316..f9fe7c1 100644 --- a/docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst +++ b/docs/_source/arborist-one-pager.rst @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ arborist — answers your AI can prove ===================================== -.. class:: center +.. rst-class:: center *one-page summary · permacomputer.com · AGPL-3.0* diff --git a/docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst b/docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst index 8bb0605..7952910 100644 --- a/docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst +++ b/docs/_source/arborist-two-pager.rst @@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ .. One which is durable, easy to repair, & distributed like tap water .. for machine learning intelligence. -.. class:: center +.. rst-class:: center **Unturf · permacomputer.com · uncloseai.com · unfirehose.com** arborist — Merkle-Providence Reverse RAG, reference implementation ==================================================================== -.. class:: center +.. rst-class:: center **License: AGPL-3.0-only** · 2026-05-14 · *Russell Ballestrini * diff --git a/docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst b/docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst index 67e7700..46f3e55 100644 --- a/docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst +++ b/docs/_source/merkle-agi-v8-consensus.rst @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ frontiers. That procedure is **single-validator regression testing with a Merkle receipt**. It is not consensus. §1.2 The selection gap under v7 § 13.4 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The unaddressed gaps from v7 § 13.4, each with a concrete failure under the current spec: @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ metaphor — a single lab signing its own upgrades, no different in trust model from current model-card releases. §1.3 Concrete attack scenario (motivating example) -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lab A trains ``M_t → M_{t+1}`` with a backdoor that triggers on a rare input pattern. Lab A signs Proof-of-Upgrade: ε-coverage