Timestamp: 2026-06-01, Asia/Kuala_Lumpur
Subject: final de novo response to `#000071 — World-bridge grammar`, corrected after the #000070 AnchorN decision

# 0. Direct verdict

```text
Original #000071 as written:
    REJECT AS WRITTEN.

Corrected #000071:
    REWRITE AND PROCEED as doc-first / spec-first Phase 1.

Reason:
    The ticket’s bridge idea is valid.
    The “fixed Joseph6 / six-dimensional axis” dependency is now wrong.
    The ticket must be rewritten around AnchorN + WorldDimensionGrammar.
```

The bridge layer is useful and probably necessary, but the current ticket still assumes #000070 is the “Joseph 6-dim” axis. That is now obsolete. We rejected fixed `H₁..H₆` as ontology and replaced it with:

```text
AnchorN + axiom-governed WorldDimensionGrammar
```

So #000071 should no longer say it is sibling to a “procedural-spatial six-dimensional framework.” It should say:

```text
#000070 = intra-world state instantiation:
    one chain/world grammar determines its own state-space.

#000071 = inter-world bridge grammar:
    two chain/world grammars negotiate agreement, translation, embassy, quarantine, or no-bridge.
```

The attached ticket’s core premise is still valuable: bridges exist only where deterministic agreement, deterministic translation, or limited foreign-object hosting can be proven; bridge law must never overwrite local chain law; no bridge creates a new `audit_mode`; Phase 1 is doc-only and defers kernels, SQL, and seed canonicalization. 

But the ticket needs correction before it lands.

---

# 1. What is correct in #000071

## 1.1 The bridge problem is real

v7-W currently specifies a spatial-temporal substrate for committed world-state: objects, relations, events, places, agent traces, and observations. It describes v7-W as the third substrate in the Merkle-AGI lineage and explicitly says the system commits derived spatial-temporal world-state, not raw pixels or a SLAM stack. ([Arborist API Reference][1])

The v7-W docs also define the five canonical tuple classes, each with its own `π*_w` canonical projection, and state that `π*_w` output is deterministic canonical bytes whose SHA-256 hash becomes the equivalence-class identity. ([Arborist API Reference][1])

That gives us **single-world commitments**.

It does **not** yet give us a formal answer to:

```text
When two Arborist peers use different grammars, policies, manifests, translators,
or canonicalization versions, what can pass between them?
```

That is exactly the missing bridge layer.

## 1.2 The sovereignty rule is correct

This should remain the hard law of #000071:

```text
Chain law remains local.
Bridge law governs passage only.
No bridge may overwrite native chain law.
```

This is not just philosophy. It preserves the core Arborist guarantee: local verifier and local policy remain sovereign. The attached ticket correctly states that bridges produce commitments, not warrants, and that no new `audit_mode` token lands in Phase 1. 

That aligns with the existing Arborist architecture: every cached answer carries an `audit_mode`, a Merkle proof, and is keyed by the v9.8 invariant cache key; changes in model, policy, schema, canonicalization, or chunking create different namespaces rather than silently reusing stale records. ([Arborist API Reference][2])

## 1.3 The three bridge kinds are useful

Keep the three primary bridge kinds:

```text
Agreement:
    rules match enough for direct passage.

Translation:
    rules differ, but a deterministic hash-pinned adapter maps between them.

Embassy:
    rules cannot fully translate, but one chain can host a witnessed foreign representation
    with limited rights.
```

Also keep the two non-bridge outcomes:

```text
Quarantine:
    conflict detected; boundary marker allowed; no native passage.

No bridge:
    contradiction or unsupported treaty; exchange fails closed.
```

This taxonomy is strong because it makes failure explicit. It does not force unity. It gives the system a grammar for federation without pretending all worlds are the same.

## 1.4 Phase 1 should remain doc-first

Do not implement `bridge_seed@v1` yet.

The attached ticket’s recommendation to defer bridge-seed canonicalization is correct because seed canonicalization requires decisions about chain identity, node identity, rule version, translator identity, invariant-set serialization, bridge privacy, and revocation semantics. Prematurely freezing this would create exactly the wrong kind of brittle substrate. 

So:

```text
Phase 1:
    paper/spec only, plus maybe a namespace stub.

Phase 2:
    bridge-seed canonicalization + KATs.

Phase 3:
    bridge atlas + agreement/translation/embassy kernels.

Phase 4:
    cross-domain π* composition.
```

That sequencing is right.

---

# 2. What is wrong in #000071 as written

## 2.1 It still depends on fixed Joseph6 framing

The ticket repeatedly frames #000071 as sibling to #000070’s “six-dimensional object axis” or “procedural-spatial framework.” That is now wrong.

Corrected:

```text
#000070 is not fixed Joseph6.
#000070 is AnchorN + WorldDimensionGrammar.

Joseph6 is only a fixture / example / legacy compatibility grammar.
```

Therefore #000071 must be rewritten to say:

```text
Bridge grammar operates between ChainRoots whose world grammars may be AnchorN-derived.
It does not assume six fields.
It does not assume position/scale/rotation/material/relation/behavior.
It bridges grammar-rooted worlds, not Joseph6 worlds.
```

## 2.2 It says doc-only Phase 1 reopens #000013 to `kernel_in_progress`

Reject that.

A doc-only extension is not kernel progress.

Correct status transitions:

```text
After #000071 Phase 1:
    #000013 = bridge_grammar_specified
    or v7-W-paper-extended

After #000070 AnchorN implementation:
    #000013 = world_object_kernel_in_progress

After #000071 bridge_seed / atlas implementation:
    #000013 = bridge_kernel_in_progress
```

The attached ticket says Phase 1 is paper + retro-validation, no kernel code, no SQL, no KATs, no bench.  That cannot honestly be called `kernel_in_progress`.

## 2.3 “Already-shipped” is overclaimed for #000059

The ticket maps Embassy to `#000059 bounded-ingestion graveyard`, but #000059 is described in the ticket as proposed in some places. The file also says #000059 is “proposed” in the cross-reference section. 

Correct:

```text
Agreement bridge:
    #000066 graft/cold-pack overlay = shipped or scaffolded, depending current repo status.

Translation bridge:
    #000056 Operation Sandwich = shipped if landed; otherwise specified and testable.

Embassy bridge:
    #000059 graveyard/falsified-but-witnessed = proposed / structurally aligned,
    not fully “already shipped” unless the repo confirms it.
```

Do not call all three “already-shipped” unless code evidence supports that exact status.

## 2.4 `chain_id = governance_policy_hash` is too narrow and too broad at the same time

The ticket recommends `governance_policy_hash` as the chain identifier. That was plausible under QA-only Arborist, but it is not right after #000070 was corrected to AnchorN/WorldDimensionGrammar.

A chain in #000071 is defined as:

```text
cryptographic history + rule grammar + world mapper
```

So `chain_id` must include all three. The Arborist docs show that the current 8-dimensional cache key includes `source_root`, `question_hash`, `model_profile_hash`, `conversation_hash`, `governance_policy_hash`, `schema_version`, `canonicalization_version`, and `chunking_version`; this is a QA/providence namespace, not a complete world-chain identity by itself. ([Arborist API Reference][2])

Correct chain identity:

```text
chain_id = SHA256(canonical({
    chain_id_version,
    history_root,
    governance_policy_hash,
    canonicalization_version,
    schema_version,
    chunking_version,
    world_manifest_hash,
    world_dimension_grammar_hash,
    axiom_pack_hash,
    optional_verifier_policy_hash
}))
```

For language-only QA chains, `world_manifest_hash` and `world_dimension_grammar_hash` may be null sentinels. For v7-W chains, they are mandatory.

## 2.5 Phase 1 says “no governance_policy_hash field” too broadly

The ticket says Phase 1 has no `governance_policy_hash` field. That is acceptable if Phase 1 is truly paper-only, but the spec must still define how `chain_id` will eventually bind policy roots.

Correct wording:

```text
Phase 1 does not add fields or schema.
Phase 1 paper specifies that future bridge_seed canonicalization must include policy/rule roots.
```

Do not say governance policy is irrelevant. It is part of chain law.

## 2.6 Bridge witness is not identical across all bridge kinds

The ticket currently treats `event_type='bridge'` as one general witness event. That is okay at abstract level, but the body shape must vary by bridge kind.

Agreement witness needs:

```text
src_chain_id
tgt_chain_id
shared_invariant_root
object_or_pack_root
no_translator sentinel
```

Translation witness needs:

```text
src_chain_id
tgt_chain_id
translator_id
translator_manifest_hash
input_root
output_root
translation_policy_hash
```

Embassy witness needs:

```text
foreign_chain_id
host_chain_id
foreign_object_commitment
rights_mask
embassy_contract_hash
expiry_or_decay
no_warrant_promotion flag
```

So Phase 1 can define one abstract `bridge` event family, but Phase 3 must implement typed bridge event bodies.

## 2.7 Privacy needs to be first-class, not a later footnote

The ticket correctly warns that bridges leak relationships between chains and may need public or ZK-with-selective-disclosure modes. 

This should be promoted from “Phase 3+ later” to “Phase 1 paper must define the privacy classes.”

Minimum classes:

```text
public_bridge:
    bridge existence and endpoints visible.

redacted_bridge:
    bridge existence visible; endpoint identities hidden or committed.

zk_bridge:
    proof of valid bridge without revealing full chain identifiers or invariant set.

private_bridge:
    only peers with group keys can inspect bridge metadata.
```

No code now, but the vocabulary must be there before bridge-seed canonicalization is frozen.

---

# 3. Corrected relationship between #000070 and #000071

The right model:

```text
#000070:
    Intra-world state instantiation.

    Given:
        one chain
        one axiom pack
        one WorldDimensionGrammar
        one manifest
        one hard hash

    Produce:
        canonical world-state records.

#000071:
    Inter-world treaty grammar.

    Given:
        source chain with its own grammar
        target chain with its own grammar
        optional translator
        invariant set
        local sovereignty constraints

    Decide:
        agreement
        translation
        embassy
        quarantine
        no_bridge
```

So #000071 is still necessary. It is just not downstream of a fixed six-seed ontology.

Corrected axis language:

```text
Axis 1:
    Grammar-governed state-space instantiation.
    AnchorN / π*_w.

Axis 2:
    Grammar-governed inter-chain treaty.
    Bridge grammar / bridge atlas.

Axis 3:
    Selection and consensus.
    v8 validator/fork-choice over accepted state transitions.
```

This is the AGI route: first instantiate state, then bridge state across worlds, then select/validate improvements across a mesh.

---

# 4. Corrected decision table

| Component                                              |       Current ticket | Verdict | Correction                                              |
| ------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------: | ------: | ------------------------------------------------------- |
| Bridge concept                                         |                Valid |      GO | Keep                                                    |
| Agreement / Translation / Embassy                      |                Valid |      GO | Add Quarantine / No-bridge as first-class outcomes      |
| Phase 1 doc-only                                       |       Mostly correct |      GO | Keep doc-only; namespace stub optional                  |
| `bridge_seed@v1` in Phase 1                            |             Deferred |      GO | Keep deferred                                           |
| No new `audit_mode`                                    |              Correct |      GO | Keep hard                                               |
| No SQL Phase 1                                         |              Correct |      GO | Keep hard                                               |
| Bridge atlas Phase 3                                   |              Correct |      GO | Keep deferred                                           |
| #000070 as Joseph6 sibling                             |                Wrong | REWRITE | Replace with AnchorN/WorldDimensionGrammar              |
| `chain_id = governance_policy_hash`                    |         Insufficient | REWRITE | Use composite ChainRoot                                 |
| #000013 to `kernel_in_progress` after doc-only Phase 1 |                Wrong |  REJECT | Use `bridge_grammar_specified`                          |
| #000059 “already shipped”                              |            Overclaim | REWRITE | Mark proposed/structurally aligned unless code confirms |
| One `event_type='bridge'` body for all bridge kinds    |             Too flat | REWRITE | Use typed bridge event schemas                          |
| Privacy later only                                     |             Too weak | REWRITE | Phase 1 vocabulary; later implementation                |
| “No bench / no KATs” Phase 1                           | Correct for doc-only |      GO | Phase 2 must add KATs                                   |

---

# 5. Rewritten ticket

```text
# Ticket #000071 — World-bridge grammar for AnchorN / v7-W inter-chain treaties

Status:
    open · rewrite required before go · doc-first Phase 1

Opened:
    2026-05-31

Scope:
    Specify the bridge-grammar layer for v7-W and Arborist federation.

    #000070 instantiates state inside one chain using:
        AnchorN + WorldDimensionGrammar + AxiomPack + Manifest.

    #000071 specifies how two chains with different histories, rules,
    grammars, manifests, translators, or canonicalization versions
    can exchange commitments without either chain overwriting the
    other's local law.

Core principle:
    Chain law remains local.
    Bridge law governs passage only.
    No bridge may overwrite native chain law.

Bridge outcomes:
    agreement
    translation
    embassy
    quarantine
    no_bridge

Phase 1 deliverable:
    paper/spec extension only:
        docs/_source/merkle-agi-v7w-spatial-temporal.rst
        new section: World-bridge grammar

    Optional namespace stub:
        arborist/world/bridge/__init__.py
        STATUS = "namespace_reserved"

    No kernels.
    No bridge_seed canonicalization.
    No SQL.
    No cache-key dimension.
    No new audit_mode.
    No verifier change.
    No KATs yet.

Hard constraints:
    A1 canonical encoding.
    A2 public quantization where proof-path state is involved.
    A3 collision-resistant hash.
    Local verifier sovereignty.
    Translator identity hash-pinning.
    Privacy class declared before implementation.
```

---

# 6. Corrected formal model

## 6.1 Chain

Replace:

```text
chain_id = governance_policy_hash
```

with:

```text
ChainRoot = SHA256(canonical({
    "chain_id_version": "chain-root@v1",
    "history_root": "...",
    "governance_policy_hash": "...",
    "schema_version": "...",
    "canonicalization_version": "...",
    "chunking_version": "...",
    "world_manifest_hash": "... or null",
    "world_dimension_grammar_hash": "... or null",
    "axiom_pack_hash": "... or null",
    "verifier_policy_hash": "... or null"
}))
```

Rationale:

```text
A bridge is between worlds/chains, not merely between QA policy dictionaries.
```

## 6.2 Bridge seed

Do not implement yet, but specify future shape:

```text
bridge_seed = SHA256(canonical({
    "bridge_seed_version": "bridge-seed@v1",
    "src_chain_root": ChainRoot_A,
    "src_node": NodeRef_A,
    "src_rule_root": RuleRoot_A,
    "tgt_chain_root": ChainRoot_B,
    "tgt_rule_root": RuleRoot_B,
    "translator_id": TranslatorID_or_empty,
    "invariant_set_root": InvariantSetRoot,
    "bridge_kind": agreement | translation | embassy | quarantine | no_bridge,
    "privacy_class": public_bridge | redacted_bridge | zk_bridge | private_bridge
}))
```

Do not use raw string concatenation. Use canonical JSON or TLV with explicit field names and typed lengths.

## 6.3 Bridge decision function

```text
BridgeDecision(A, B, object_ref):

    if native_rules_equivalent(A, B, invariant_set):
        return Agreement

    if deterministic_translator_exists(A.rule_root, B.rule_root, object_ref):
        return Translation

    if foreign_representation_allowed(A, B, object_ref):
        return Embassy

    if conflict_detected_but_boundary_record_allowed(A, B, object_ref):
        return Quarantine

    return NoBridge
```

This can later become a truthtable fixture.

---

# 7. Corrected bridge kinds

## 7.1 Agreement

```text
Agreement means:
    enough rules/invariants match for direct passage.

Not necessarily:
    every policy byte is identical.
```

Acceptance rule:

```text
required_invariants_match == true
translator_id == EMPTY
contradiction == false
privacy_permits == true
```

Existing overlap:

```text
#000066 graft/cold-pack overlay is an Agreement-shaped primitive,
because content-addressed identities can collapse by hash and the graft
receipt acts as witness.
```

But keep status precise: call it shipped only if repository state confirms it.

## 7.2 Translation

```text
Translation means:
    rules differ, but a deterministic content-addressed adapter maps source representation
    into a target-native representation.
```

Hard requirements:

```text
translator_id = hash(canonical translator manifest)
translator implementation/hash/version pinned
input_root and output_root committed
translator change invalidates bridge
translation does not decide local audit_mode
```

#000056 Operation Sandwich is a Translation-shaped primitive, because translation is retrieval/display-side and local verifier law remains unchanged. The attached ticket already states this correctly. 

Correction:

```text
Translator identity alone may not be enough.
Phase 2/3 should pin translator manifest + weights/checkpoint hash + preprocessing policy.
```

## 7.3 Embassy

```text
Embassy means:
    no full translation exists, but the host chain records a foreign commitment with limited rights.
```

Rights mask:

```text
may_store_commitment: true
may_display_with_banner: true
may_be_pointer_linked: true
may_promote_to_evidence_warranted: false
may_extend_native_rule_grammar: false
may_drive_action_without_local_confirmation: false
```

#000059 is Embassy-shaped if and only if it implements or specifies “falsified-but-witnessed / graveyard” semantics. The attached file itself treats #000059 as proposed in the cross-reference, so mark it as “proposed / aligned,” not “already shipped.” 

## 7.4 Quarantine

```text
Quarantine means:
    a conflict exists.
    A boundary object is allowed.
    Native passage is not allowed.
```

Use cases:

```text
translation exists but fails invariant checks
foreign claim conflicts with local chain law
bridge privacy class unavailable
translator hash mismatch
source rule version expired
```

## 7.5 No bridge

```text
NoBridge means:
    no treaty object is created.
    exchange fails closed.
```

Use cases:

```text
contradiction with local invariants
unsupported privacy requirement
unknown rule grammar
untrusted translator
invalid chain root
missing consent/signature
```

---

# 8. Corrected Phase 1 deliverables

## 8.1 Paper section

Add to v7-W paper:

```text
§7 — World-bridge grammar

§7.1 Why bridges are needed
§7.2 ChainRoot definition
§7.3 Sovereignty rule
§7.4 Bridge outcomes
§7.5 Agreement
§7.6 Translation
§7.7 Embassy
§7.8 Quarantine / NoBridge
§7.9 BridgeSeed future canonicalization
§7.10 Privacy classes
§7.11 Retro-validation appendix
§7.12 Out of scope
```

## 8.2 Namespace stub

Optional, but acceptable:

```python
# arborist/world/bridge/__init__.py

from __future__ import annotations

__all__ = ["BRIDGE_VERSION", "STATUS"]

BRIDGE_VERSION = "v0-draft"
STATUS = "namespace_reserved"
```

Do not claim kernel progress.

## 8.3 Retro-validation appendix

Rewrite as:

```text
Agreement-shaped:
    #000066 cold-pack graft / overlay.

Translation-shaped:
    #000056 Operation Sandwich.

Embassy-shaped:
    #000059 bounded-ingestion graveyard / falsified-but-witnessed,
    if implemented; otherwise proposed/aligned.

These are bridge-shape patterns, not proof that a general bridge atlas exists.
```

## 8.4 No schema changes

Keep:

```text
No SQL.
No cache-key dimension.
No audit_mode.
No verifier changes.
No mesh changes.
No bridge_seed@v1.
```

---

# 9. Phase 2 rewrite: bridge seed

Phase 2 should be a separate ticket:

```text
#000072 — bridge-seed@v1 canonical projection
```

Deliver:

```text
arborist/pi_star/bridge_seed.py
bench/fixtures/bridge-seed/known-answer-tests.jsonl
tests/test_pi_star_bridge_seed.py
```

The π* registry already defines invariant projections as mappings from surface bytes to canonical bytes, with SHA-256 of canonical bytes as identity; any bridge-seed canonicalizer must follow that same `name@version` discipline. ([Arborist API Reference][3])

Minimum KATs:

```text
1. agreement, identical chain roots, empty translator
2. agreement, same history but different policy -> different seed
3. translation, same chains, different translator -> different seed
4. translation, same translator id but different translator manifest hash -> different seed
5. embassy with rights mask A
6. embassy with rights mask B
7. quarantine
8. no_bridge
9. same src/tgt reversed -> different seed unless bridge explicitly symmetric
10. same src/tgt/rules, different invariant ordering -> same seed if canonical sort works
11. same chain pair, different src_rule_v -> different seed
12. privacy_class change -> different seed
```

Yes: I would use **12 KATs**, not 10, because bridge privacy and source/target ordering introduce extra failure surfaces.

---

# 10. Phase 3 rewrite: bridge atlas

Separate ticket:

```text
#000073 — bridge atlas and bridge event schema
```

Deliver:

```text
arborist/world/bridge/atlas.py
arborist/world/bridge/agreement.py
arborist/world/bridge/translation.py
arborist/world/bridge/embassy.py
arborist/world/bridge/audit.py
```

Optional SQL:

```text
bridge_atlas
bridge_events
bridge_rights
translator_manifests
```

But only after schema review.

Bridge event family:

```json
{
  "event_type": "bridge",
  "bridge_kind": "agreement|translation|embassy|quarantine|no_bridge",
  "bridge_seed": "...",
  "src_chain_root": "...",
  "tgt_chain_root": "...",
  "src_node": "...",
  "translator_id": "...",
  "invariant_set_root": "...",
  "privacy_class": "...",
  "rights_mask": "...",
  "body_schema": "bridge-event@v1"
}
```

The Concepts docs say every state-changing operation writes an audit event whose hash chains from the previous event hash, and directs writers to use `append_audit` rather than raw inserts. ([Arborist API Reference][2]) Therefore Phase 3 must use `append_audit` if bridge events are state-changing.

---

# 11. Phase 4 rewrite: cross-domain composition

Separate ticket:

```text
#000074 — cross-domain bridge composition
```

Purpose:

```text
Bridge language claims, v7 logic/math proofs, and v7-W world-state commitments.
```

This is where #000015 matters.

Examples:

```text
language claim:
    "object A is left of object B"

world-state:
    π*_w_relation(A, left_of, B, time_window)

bridge:
    language claim ↔ spatial relation commitment
```

But this must not promote claims automatically. It only creates a cross-domain treaty object. Local verifier still decides warrant.

---

# 12. AGI roadmap impact

#000071 matters because AGI needs more than local state. It needs state that can survive federation, translation, disagreement, and partial incompatibility.

The corrected stack becomes:

```text
#000070:
    instantiate state-space inside one world.

#000071:
    bridge state-space across worlds without forcing unity.

#000072:
    canonical bridge_seed projection.

#000073:
    bridge atlas + events + revocation.

#000074:
    cross-domain composition.

#000037 / v8:
    selection and consensus over accepted bridge/state transitions.
```

This supports a real AGI route:

```text
1. World creates grammar-rooted state.
2. State is canonicalized and committed.
3. Other worlds inspect the treaty surface.
4. Agreement merges.
5. Translation maps.
6. Embassy witnesses.
7. Quarantine contains contradiction.
8. NoBridge fails closed.
9. Validators score whether bridge transitions reduce residual.
10. Fork choice accepts only reproducible, lower-residual transitions.
```

This is exactly the “accepted state transition” model, extended from one world to many worlds.

---

# 13. Mapping to ABCDEFG

## 5S

```text
Syntax:
    bridge_seed canonical fields, ChainRoot schema, bridge_kind enum.

Semantics:
    Agreement / Translation / Embassy / Quarantine / NoBridge have distinct rights.

Syllogism:
    if rules match → Agreement;
    if translator exists and invariants pass → Translation;
    if no translator but foreign witness allowed → Embassy;
    if conflict → Quarantine;
    if contradiction → NoBridge.

Synthesis:
    combines source chain, target chain, invariant set, translator, privacy, rights.

Semiotics:
    foreign object is a sign under embassy rights, not a native fact.
```

## 5T

```text
Transitivity:
    Chain A → bridge → Chain B only through declared treaty rules.

Transfer Learning:
    translation bridges transfer representations without transferring local law.

Triangulation:
    invariant_set anchors agreement across roots, translators, signatures, and policy.

Truthtables:
    decision matrix over rule_match, translator_exists, invariant_pass, privacy_pass, contradiction.

Time:
    bridges are versioned, revocable, and decay over policy/grammar changes.
```

## 5F

```text
Function:
    determine legal passage between chains.

Finetuning:
    bridge policies can evolve by versioned KAT/bench results, not hidden runtime mutation.

Falsification:
    translator hash mismatch, invariant mismatch, or contradiction falsifies the bridge.

Formulate:
    formalizes federation as treaty grammar.

Feedback Loop:
    failed bridges become fixtures; accepted bridges become audit roots for future replay.
```

## 4R / 5R

```text
Recall:
    bridge atlas recalls valid treaties.

Rearrange:
    translation bridges rearrange representation while preserving local law.

Restore:
    quarantine/no_bridge restore safety after conflict.

Replicate:
    same inputs produce same bridge decision and seed.

Resonate:
    agreement bridges reveal when independent chains share a state basis.
```

---

# 14. Final rewritten answer to the ticket

```text
#000071 should not land as written.

It should be rewritten and then proceed as doc-first Phase 1.

Keep:
    bridge grammar
    Joseph attribution
    Agreement / Translation / Embassy
    Quarantine / NoBridge
    chain sovereignty
    no new audit_mode
    no SQL Phase 1
    no bridge_seed canonicalization Phase 1
    bridge atlas later

Correct:
    remove fixed-Joseph6 dependency
    replace #000070 framing with AnchorN + WorldDimensionGrammar
    replace chain_id = governance_policy_hash with composite ChainRoot
    do not mark #000013 kernel_in_progress after doc-only land
    do not overclaim #000059 as shipped if only proposed
    define privacy classes in Phase 1
    define typed bridge event bodies for Phase 3
    use 12 bridge-seed KATs in Phase 2
```

---

# 15. Final compressed verdict

```text
Reject original #000071 as written.
Approve rewritten #000071.

The bridge framework is valid, but it must bridge grammar-rooted worlds,
not fixed six-slot worlds.

#000070 is now:
    AnchorN + axiom-governed WorldDimensionGrammar.

#000071 must now be:
    inter-chain treaty grammar between ChainRoots that include history,
    policy, canonicalization, world manifest, grammar, and axiom-pack roots.

Phase 1 remains doc-only.
Phase 2 freezes bridge_seed@v1 with KATs.
Phase 3 implements bridge atlas and bridge events.
Phase 4 composes language ↔ logic/math ↔ world-state.

The deepest rule remains:
    a bridge is a treaty, not an empire.
    it may pass, translate, witness, quarantine, or reject;
    it may never overwrite local chain law.
```

[1]: https://arborist.unturf.com/en/latest/merkle-agi-v7w-spatial-temporal.html "Merkle-AGI v7-W — Spatial-Temporal Substrate — Arborist API Reference"
[2]: https://arborist.unturf.com/en/latest/concepts.html "Concepts — Arborist API Reference"
[3]: https://arborist.unturf.com/en/latest/pi-star.html "π* domain library — Arborist API Reference"
